BenderW. M.WallM. E. (1994). Social-emotional development of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 17, 223–241.
2.
BoyleJ. R.WeishaarM. (2001). The effects of strategic notetaking on the recall and comprehension of lecture information for high school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 133–141.
3.
BryanT.NelsonC.MathurS. (1995). Homework: A survey of primary students in regular, resource, and self-contained special education classes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 10, 85–90.
4.
ChurtonM. W.Cranston-GringrasA. M.BlairT. R. (1998). Teaching children with diverse abilities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
CrankJ. N.BulgrenJ. A. (1993). Visual depictions as information organizers for enhancing achievement of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 140–147.
6.
GettingerM. (1991). Learning time and retention differences between nondisabled students and students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 14, 179–189.
7.
HudsonP.Lignugaris-KraftB.MillerT. (1993). Using content enhancements to improve the performance of adolescents with learning disabilities in content classes. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 8, 106–126.
8.
HughesC. A.RuhlK. L.SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (2002). Effects of instruction in an assignment completion strategy on the homework performance of students with learning disabilities in general education classes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 1–18.
9.
LenzB. K.BulgrenJ.HudsonP. J. (1990). Content enhancement: A model for promoting the acquisition of content by individuals with learning disabilities. In ScruggsT.WongY. L. B. (Eds.), Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 122–165). New York: Springer-Verlog.
10.
McMasterK. N.FuchsD. (2002). Effects of cooperative learning on the academic achievement of students with learning disabilities: An update of Tateyama-Sniezek's review. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 107–117.
11.
PeperR. J.MayerR. E. (1986). Generative effects of note-taking during science lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), 34–38.
12.
RuhlK. L.SuritskyS. (1995). The pause procedure and/or an outline: Effect on immediate free recall and lecture notes taken by college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 18, 2–11.
13.
ScanlonD.DeshlerD. D.SchumakerJ. B. (1996). Can a strategy be taught and learned in secondary inclusive classrooms?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11, 41–57.
14.
SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (1984). Setting demand variables: A major factor in program planning for the LD adolescent. Topics in Language Disorders, 4, 22–44.
15.
SlavinR. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43–69.
16.
SuritskyS. K.HughesC. A. (1996). Notetaking strategy instruction. In DeshlerD. D.EllisE. S.LenzB. K. (Eds.), Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 267–312). Denver, CO: Love.
17.
WilsonD. R.DavidW. J. (1994). Academic intrinsic motivation and attitudes toward school and learning of learning disabled students. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 148–156.
18.
WolfordP. L.HewardW. L.AlberS. R. (2001). Teaching middle school students with learning disabilities to recruit peer assistance during cooperative learning group activities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 161–173.