BennerS. M. (1998). Special education issues within the context of American society. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2.
CarlbergC.KavaleK. A. (1980). The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A metaanalysis. The Journal of Special Education, 14, 295–309.
3.
DaltonB.PishaB.CoyneP.EagletonM.DeysherS. (2001). Engaging the text: Reciprocal teaching and questioning strategies in a scaffolded learning environment. (OSEP Project # H324D 980051, December 1, 1998 to November 30, 2001. Final report to the U. S. Office of Special Education.) Peabody, MA: Center for Applied Special Technology.
4.
DeBettencourtL. U. (2002). Understanding the differences between IDEA and section 504. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 34 (3), 16–24.
5.
HeumannJ. E.HehirT. (1997). Believing in children: A great IDEA for the future. Exceptional Parent, 27 (9), 38–42.
6.
HitchcockC. G. (2001). Balanced instructional support and challenge in universally designed learning environments. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16 (4), 23–30.
7.
HitchcockC. G.MeyerA.RoseD.JacksonR. (2002). Access, participation, and progress in the general curriculum: A universal design for learning. Retrieved April 12, 2002, from the NCAC Web site: http://www.cast.org/ncac/techbrief.
8.
JacksonR.HarperK.JacksonJ. (2001). Effective teaching practices and the barriers limiting their use in accessing the curriculum: A review of recent literature. Retrieved September 5, 2001, from CAST Web site: http://www.cast.org/ncac/index.cfm?i=1942/.
9.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1986). Mainstreaming and cooperative learning strategies. Exceptional Children, 52, 553–561.
10.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
11.
JunkalaJ.MooneyJ. F. (1986). Special education students in regular classes: What happened to the pyramid?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19 (4), 218–221.
12.
King-SearsM. E. (1997). Best academic practices for inclusive practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 29, 1–21.
13.
LippmanL.GoldbergI. I. (1973). Right to education: Anatomy of the Pennsylvania Case. New York: Teachers College Press.*
14.
LipskyD. K.GartnerA. (1989). Beyond special education: Quality for all. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.*
15.
MeyenE. J. (1996). Exceptional children in today's schools (3rd ed.). Denver, CO: Love.*
16.
NoletV.McLaughlinM. J. (2000). Accessing the general curriculum: Including students with disabilities in standards-based reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.*
17.
OsborneA. G.DiMattiaP. (1994). The IDEA's least restrictive environment mandate: Legal implications. Exceptional Children, 61, 6–15.
18.
PearlmanL. (1992). School's out: Hyper learning, the new technology, and the end of education. New York: William Morrow.
19.
PugachM. C.WargerC. L. (2001). Curriculum matters: Raising expectations for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 22 (4), 194–198.
20.
RoseD. H.MeyerA. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
21.
SlavinR. E.MaddenN. A.LeavyM. (1984). Effects of team assisted individualization on the mathematics achievement of academically handicapped and non-handicapped students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 813–819.
22.
ThurlowM. L. (2000). Standards-based reform and students with disabilities: Reflections on a decade of change. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33 (3), 1–16.
23.
TurnbullH. R.TurnbullA. P. (1998). Free appropriate public education (5th ed.). Denver, CO: Love.*
24.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In ColeM.John-SteinerV.ScribnerS.SoubermanE. (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
WehmeyerM. L.SandsD. J.KnowltonH. E.KozleskiE. B. (2002). Providing access to the general curriculum: Teaching students with mental retardation. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.*
26.
WillM. C. (1986). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 111–145.
27.
YellM. L. (1998). The law and special education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
28.
YellM. L.KatsiyannisA. (2001). Promises and challenges in education law: 25 years of legal developments. Preventing School Failure, 45 (2), 82–87.
29.
YellM.ShrinerJ. (1997). The IDEA amendments of 1997: Implications for special and general education teachers, administrators, and teacher trainers. Focus on Exceptional Children, 30 (1), 1–19.