American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). (1995). Position statement and guidelines for acoustics in educational settings. ASHA, 37 (14), 15–19.
2.
ArnoldP.CanningD. (1999). Does classroom amplification aid comprehension?British Journal of Audiology, 33, 171–178.
3.
BeattieR. C.ZippJ. A. (1990). Range of intensities yielding PB max and the threshold for monosyllabic words for hearing-impaired subjects. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 417–426.
4.
BlakeR.FieldB.FosterC.PlattF.WertzP. (1991). Effect of FM auditory trainers on attending behaviors of learning-disabled children. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 111–14.
5.
CrandellC. C.SmaldinoJ. J.FlexerC. (1995). Sound-field fm applications: Theory and practical applications. San Diego: Singular.
6.
DavisD. (1991). Utilizing amplification devices in the regular classroom. Hearing Instruments, 42 (7), 18–23.
7.
DownsD.CrumM. (1978). Processing demands during auditory learning under degraded listening conditions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, 702–714.
8.
FlexerC.RichardsC.BuieC.BrandyW. (1994). Making the grade with amplification in classrooms. Hearing Instruments, 45 (10), 24–26.
9.
GotassC.StarrC. D. (1993). Vocal fatigue among teachers. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica (Basal), 45 (3), 120.
10.
GreyerbiehlD. (1993). Educational policies and practices that support the inclusion of students with disabilities in the general education classroom. Charleston: West Virginia Developmental Disabilities Planning Council.
11.
JohnsonE. (2001). Let's hear it for learning: Improving classroom acoustics can maximize student productivity at a minimal cost. American School and University, 73 (11), 28–30.
12.
KaufmanJ. M.PullenP. I. (1996). Eight myths about special education. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28 (5), 1–12.
13.
LevoieR. (Presenter). (1989). Understanding learning disabilities: How difficult can this be? [Videotape]. (Available from Peter Rosen Productions, Washington, DC).
14.
PalmerC. M. (1998). Quantification of the ecobehavioral impact of a soundfield loudspeaker system in elementary classrooms. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 819–833.
RosenbergG.AllenL.RedmondB.PhillipsJ.StigersK. (1995). Improving classroom acoustics, listening, and learning with FM soundfield amplification. Poster Presentation at the American Academy of Audiology Convention, Dallas, TX.
17.
SapienzaC. M.CrandellC. C.CurtisB. (1999). Effects of sound-field frequency modulation amplification on reducing teachers' sound pressure level in the classroom. Journal of Voice, 3, 375–381.
18.
VanDykeJ. (1985). Evaluation of classroom listening behaviors. Rocky Mountain Journal of Communication Disorders. 1, 8–13.
19.
WolgemuthK. S.KamhiA. G.LeeR. F. (1998). Metaphor performance in children with hearing impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 29, 216–231.