BrowderD.BambaraL. (2000). Home and community. In SnellM.BrownF. (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (5th ed., pp. 543–589). Columbus, OH: Merrill.*
2.
ClaytonJ.BurdgeM.KleinertH. (2001). Integrating alternate assessment with ongoing instruction. In KleinertH.KearnsJ. (Eds.), Alternate assessment: Measuring outcomes and supports for students with disabilities (pp. 77–91). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
3.
DenhamA.BennettD.EdyburnD.LahmE.KleinertH. (2001). Implementing technology to demonstrate higher levels of learning. In KleinertH.KearnsJ. (Eds.), Alternative assessment: Measuring outcomes and supports for students with disabilities (pp. 135–166). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
4.
DenhamA.LahmL. (2001). Using technology to construct alternate portfolios of students with moderate and severe disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 33 (5), 10–17.
5.
EricksonR.YsseldykeJ.ThurlowM.ElliottJ. (1998). Inclusive assessments and accountability systems: Tools of the trade in educational reform. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 31 (2), 4–9.
6.
EzellD.KleinC.Ezell-PowellS. (1999). Empowering students with mental retardation through portfolio assessment: A tool for fostering self-determination skills. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 34, 453–463.
7.
HewardW. (2000). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (6th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice-Hall.*
8.
KampferS.HorvathL.KleinertH.KearnsJ. (2001). Teachers' perceptions of one state's alternate assessment portfolio program: Implications for practice and preparation. Exceptional Children, 67, 361–374.
9.
KearnsJ. (2001). Helping students with significant disabilities gain access to general curriculum standards. In KleinertH.KearnsJ. (Eds.), Alternate assessment: Measuring outcomes and supports for students with disabilities (pp. 29–48). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
10.
KleinertH.GuiltinanS.SimsL. (1988). Teaching students with moderate and severe handicaps to select lower-priced items in shopping activities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 20 (3), 18–21.
11.
KleinertH.KearnsJ. (2001). Alternate assessment: Measuring outcomes and supports for students with disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
12.
KleinertH.KennedyS.KearnsJ. (1999). Impact of alternate assessments: A statewide teacher survey. Journal of Special Education, 33 (2), 93–102.
13.
KleinertH.ThurlowM. (2001). An introduction to alternate assessment. In KleinertH.KearnsJ. (Eds.), Alternate assessment: Measuring outcomes and supports for students with disabilities (pp. 1–15). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
Special educators share their thoughts on special education teaching conditions. (1999). CEC Today, 5 (9), pp. 1, 5, 15.
16.
U.S. Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP). (2000). OSEP memorandum to state directors of special education (OSEP 00–24). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.*