American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 406 229).
2.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1998). Blueprints for reform: Science, mathematics and technology education. New York: Oxford University Press.*
3.
BrownellM. T.MellardD. F.DeshlerD. D. (1993). Differences in the learning and transfer performance between students with learning disabilities and other lowachieving students on problem-solving tasks. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 138–156.
4.
CawleyJ.ParmarR. (1993). Verbal problem solving 1 and 2. Buffalo, NY: United Educational Services.
5.
DuncanJ. (1943). Education of the ordinary child. New York: Ronald Press.
6.
EngelmannS.CarnineD.SteelyD. (1991). Making connections in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 292–303.
7.
Federal Register, 34 C. F. R. Parts 300 and 303 (1999).
8.
GerstenR.BakerS. (1998). Real world use of scientific concepts: Integrating situated cognition with explicit instruction. Exceptional Children, 65, 23–35.
9.
HasselbringT.MooreP. (1996). Developing mathematical literacy through the use of contextualized learning environments. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 7, 199–222.
10.
IngramC. (1960). Education of the slowlearning child (3rd ed.). New York: Ronald Press.
11.
MooreL.CarnineD. (1989). Evaluating curriculum design in the context of active teaching. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 28–37.
12.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards of school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.*
13.
National Research Council. (1994). National science standards (Draft)Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14.
SeguinE. (1907). Idiocy: Its treatment by the physiological method. Albany, NY: Brandow Printing Company. Reprint of 1866 edition.
