Considering Placement and Educational Approaches for Students Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing

California Department of Education. (2000). Programs for deaf and hard of hearing students: Guidelines for quality standards. Sacramento, CA: Author.*

National Information Center on Deafness. (1991). Mainstreaming deaf and hard of hearing students: Questions & answers. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University.*

Aloia G. F. (1978). Placement in the least restrictive environment. In Developing criteria for the evaluation of the least restrictive environment provision. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare, U.S. Office of Education.

Illinois State Board of Education. (2000). Comprehensive service guidelines for Illinois students who are deaf or hard of hearing: Birth to twenty-one. Springfield, IL: Author.*

Individuals with Disabilities Act Amendments of 1997. (IDEA 97). Children, youth, and families. Inter-governmental relations. 20 USC 1400 note.

Pittman P. Huefner D. S. (2001). Will the courts go bi-bi? IDEA 1997, the courts, and deaf education. Exceptional Children, 67, 187–198.

Siegel L. (2000). The educational and communication needs of deaf and hard of hearing children: A statement of principle on fundamental educational change. American Annals of the Deaf, 145 (2), 64–77.

Yell M. L. (1995). Least restrictive environment, inclusion, and students with disabilities: A legal analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 28 (4), 389–404.

Yell M. L. Drasgow E. (2000). Litigating a free appropriate public education: The Lovaas Hearings and Cases. The Journal of Special Education, 33, 205–214.

Yell M. L. Shriner J. G. (1997). The IDEA amendments of 1997: Implications for special and general education teachers, administrators, and teacher trainers. Focus on Exceptional Children, 30 (1), 1–19.