BakerL.LombardiB. R. (1985). Students' lecture notes and their relation to test performance. Teaching of Psychology, 12, 28–32.
2.
BoyleJ. (1996). Thinking while note taking: Teaching college students to use strategic note taking during lectures. In GrownB. G. (Ed.), Innovative learning strategies: Twelfth yearbook (pp. 9–18). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.*
3.
BoyleJ. (2001). Enhancing the note-taking skills of students with mild disabilities. Intervention in School & Clinic, 36, 221.
4.
BoyleJ.WeishaarM. (1999). Note-taking strategies for students with mild disabilities. The Clearing House, 72, 392–396.
5.
CarrierC. A. (1983). Notetaking research: Implication for the classroom. Journal of Instructional Development, 6, 19–26.
6.
DeshlerD. D.EllisE. S.LenzB. K. (Eds.). (1996). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities (2nd ed.). Denver, CO: Love.*
7.
Di VestaJ. G.GrayS. G. (1972). Listening and notetaking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 8–14.
8.
EinsteinG. O.MorrisJ.SmithS. (1985). Note-taking, individual differences, and memory for lecture information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 522–532.
9.
HartleyJ. (1983). Notetaking research: Resetting the scoreboard. Bulletin of British Psychological Society, 36, 13–14.
10.
HughesC. A. (1991). Studying for and taking tests: Self-reported difficulties and strategies of university students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 66–79.
11.
HughesC. A.SuritskyS. K. (1994). Note-taking skills of university students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 20–24.
12.
KatamayaA. D.RobinsonD. H. (2000). Getting students “partially” involved in note-taking using graphic organizers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68, 119.
13.
KiewraK. A. (1987). Notetaking and review: The research and its implications. Instructional Science, 16, 233–249.
14.
KiewraK. A.DuBoisN. F.ChristianD.McShaneA. (1988). Providing study notes: Comparison of three types of notes for review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 595–597.
15.
KiewraK. A.DuBoisN. F.ChristianD.McShaneA.MeyerhofferM.RoskelleyD. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 240–245.
16.
KiewraK. A.FletcherH. J. (1984). The relationship between notetaking variables and achievement measure. Human Learning, 3, 273–280.
17.
LarkinJ. H.SimonJ. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65–99.
18.
LazarusB. D. (1991). Guided notes, review and achievement of secondary students with learning disabilities in mainstream content courses. Education and Treatment of Children, 14, 112–127.
19.
PeperR. J.MayerR. E. (1978). Note taking as a generative activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 514–522.
20.
PeperR. J.MayerR. E. (1986). Generative effects of note taking during science lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 34–38.
21.
PutnamM. L.DeshlerD. D.SchumakerJ. S. (1993). The investigation of setting demands: A missing link in learning strategy instruction. Strategy assessment and instruction for students with learning disabilities (pp. 325–354). Austin, TX: PROED.*
22.
RankinV. (1999). The thought that counts: Six skills that help kids turn notes into knowledge. School Library Journal, 45, 26–29.
23.
RobinsonD. H.KatayamaA. D.DuBoisN. F.DeVaneyT. (1998). Interactive effects of graphic organizers and delayed review in concept acquisition. The Journal of Experimental Education, 67, 17–31.
24.
RuhlK. L.SuritskyS. (1995). The pause procedure and/or an outline: Effect on immediate free recall and lecture notes taken by college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 2–11.
SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (1984). Setting demand variables: A major factor in program planning for LD adolescents. Topics in Language Disorders, 4, 22–24.
27.
SuritskyS. K. (1992). Notetaking approaches and specific areas of difficulty reported by university students with learning disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 10, 3–10.
28.
SuritskyS. K.HughesC. A. (1996). Notetaking strategy instruction. In DeshlerD. D.EllisE. S.LenzB. K. (Eds.) Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 267–312). Denver, CO: Love.*
29.
SwellerJ.ChandlerP. (1991). Evidence for cognitive load theory. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 351–362.
30.
TobiasS. (1982). When do instructional methods make a difference?Educational Researcher, 11, 4–9.
31.
WinnW. (1991). Learning from maps and diagrams. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 211–247.