DreyerL. G. (1984). Readability and responsibility. Journal of Reading, 27, 334–338.
6.
FidererA. (1999). 40 rubrics and checklists to assess reading and writing. New York: Scholastic.*
7.
FryE. B. (1989). Readability formulas— maligned but valid. Journal of Reading, 32, 292–297.
8.
IrwinJ. W.DavisC. A. (1980). Assessing readability: The checklist approach. Journal of Reading, 24, 124–130.
9.
KoenkeK. (1987). Readability formulas: Use and misuse. The Reading Teacher, 40, 672–674.
10.
LangeB. (1982). Readability formulas: Second looks, second thoughts. The Reading Teacher, 35, 858–861.
11.
LealD. J.Chamberlain-SoleckiJ. (1998). A Newbery Medal-winning combination: High student interest plus appropriate readability levels. The Reading Teacher, 51, 712–715.
12.
PatersonK. (1977). Bridge to Terabithia. New York: HarperTrophy/HarperCollins.*
SchirmerB. R. (2000). Language and literacy development in children who are deaf (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.*
15.
SchirmerB. R.BaileyJ. (2000). Writing assessment rubric: An instructional approach with struggling writers. Exceptional Children, 33, 52–58.
16.
SchweryC. S. (1998). Reading, writing, and classroom rubrics: Ways to motivate quality learning. In TaggartG. L.PhiferS. J.NixonJ. A.WoodM. (Eds.), Rubrics: A handbook for construction and use (pp. 75–100). Basel, Switzerland: Technomic.*