DowningJ. E.RyndakD. L.ClarkD. (2000). Paraeducators in inclusive classrooms. Reading and Special Education, 21 (3), 171–181.
2.
EtscheidtS. K.BartlettL. (1999). The IDEA amendments: A four-step approach for determining supplementary aids and services. Exceptional Children, 65 (2), 163–174.
3.
FrenchN. K.ChopraR. (1999). Parent perspectives on the roles of paraprofessionals. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 259–272.
4.
GiangrecoM. F.BroerS.EdelmanS. W. (1999). The tip of the iceberg: Determining whether paraprofessional support is needed for students with disabilities in general education settings. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 280–290.
5.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS.LuiselliT. E.MacFarlandS. (1997). Helping or hovering? Effects of instructional assistant proximity on students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64 (1), 7–18.
6.
MarksS. U.SchraderC.LevineM. (1999). Paraeducator experiences in inclusive settings: Helping, hovering, or holding their own?Exceptional Children, 65, 315–328.
7.
MuellerP. H. (1997). A study of the roles, training needs, and support needs of Vermont's paraeducators. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Vermont, 1997) Dissertation Abstracts International, 9970545..
8.
MurphyF. (1998). Chittenden Central Instructional Assistant Planning Process. Essex Junction, VT: Chittenden Central Supervisory Union.*
9.
PickettA. L. (1999). Strengthening and supporting teacher/ provider—paraeducator teams: Guidelines for paraeducator roles, supervision, and preparation. New York: National Resource Center for Paraprofessionals in Education and Related Services, Center for Advanced Study in Education, Graduate Center, City University of New York.*
