AmmerJ. J. (1982, April). Discrepancy between ideal and reality: An overview of regular educator's perceptions of their role in the special education decision making process. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Confederated Organizations for Teacher Education, Syracuse, NY. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 234 530).
2.
deNommeD. A. (1995). Improving the IEP process: Strategies for increasing the active involvement of junior high regular classroom teacher, parents, and students in the decision-making process and IEP development. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: Nova University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 385 986).
3.
HockM.BoltaxR. (1995, April). Improved collaboration, less paperwork: Vermont's new family centered IEP process. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Council for Exceptional Children, Indianapolis, IN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 386 877).
4.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105–17. (1997). Title 20, U.S.C. 1400–1487; U. S. Statutes at Large, 111 37–157. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 412 712).
5.
KirkV. (1997). IEP requirements encourage melding of special and general education. Counterpoint, 18(1), 3–5.
6.
MenloveR. R. (1999). Individualized education program (IEP) team member satisfaction with the IEP development process for students with disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utah State University, Logan.
7.
MooreK. J.FifieldM. B.SpiraD. A.ScarlatoM. (1989). Child study team decision making in special education: Improving the process. Remedial and Special Education, 10(4), 50–58.
8.
National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (1998). Involvement of general education teachers in the IEP process. (Report No. PFR-907). Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 426 542).
9.
NevinA.SemmelM. I.McCannS. (1983). What administrators can do to facilitate the regular classroom teacher's role in implementing individual educational plans: Am empirical analysis. Planning and Changing, 14, 150–169.
10.
NolanJ. M. S. (1995). The involvement of general education in the development and implementation of individual education programs of students with disabilities [CD-ROM]. Abstract from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: AAC 9522437.*
11.
PugachM. C. (1982). Regular classroom teacher involvement in the development and utilization of IEPs. Exceptional Children, 48, 371–374.
12.
SchragJ. A. (1996). The IEP: Benefits, challenges, and future directions. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 399 734).
13.
ShelladyS. M. (1994). School administrator, special education teacher, general education teacher, support staff, parent, and student perceptions of the IEP process (Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International 56, ACC 955197.*
14.
SmithS. W. (1990). Individualized education programs—From intent to acquiescence. Exceptional Children, 57(1), 6–14.
15.
SummersK. L. (1996). General education teachers' perceptions of their involvement in the IEP process [CD-ROM]. Abstract from: ProQuest Files: Dissertation Abstracts Item: AAC 9603524.*
16.
YsseldykeJ. E.AlgozzineB.AllenD. (1982). Participation of regular education teachers in special education team decision making. Exceptional Children, 48, 356–366.