AlperS. (1996). An ecological approach to identifying curriculum content for inclusive settings. In RyndakD. L. & AlperS. (Eds.), Curriculum content for students with moderate and severe disabilities in inclusive settings (pp. 19–31). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.*
2.
BaileyB. R., & DowningJ. (1994). Using visual accents to enhance attending to communication symbols for students with severe multiple disabilities. Review, 26, 101–118.
3.
HedeenD. L.AyresB. J.MeyerL. H., & WaiteJ. (1996). Quality inclusive schooling for students with severe behavioral challenges. In LehrD. H. & BrownF. (Eds.), People with disabilities who challenge the system (pp. 127–174). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
4.
HodgdonL. A. (1995). Visual strategies for improving communication: Practical supports for school and home. Troy, MI: Quirk Roberts Publishing.*
5.
HughesC., & CarterE. W. (2000). The transition handbook: Strategies high school teachers use that work. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
6.
MirendaP. (1999). Augmentative and alternative communication techniques. In. DowningJ. E. (Ed.), Teaching communication skills to students with severe disabilities (pp. 119–138). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.*
7.
QuillK. (1997). Instructional considerations for young children with autism: The rationale for visually cued instruction. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 27, 697–714.
8.
RowlandC., & SchweigertP. (1989). Tangible symbols: Symbolic communication for individuals with multisensory impairments. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 5, 226–234.
WestlingD. L., & FoxL. (2000). Teaching students with severe disabilities (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.*
11.
WetherbyA. M., & PrizantB. M. (1999). Enhancing language and communication development in autism: Assessment and intervention guidelines. In ZagerBerkell D. (Ed.), Autism: Identification, education and treatment (2nd ed., pp. 141–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.