The final seal of unity between the different churches and traditions is the full participation around the table of the Lord. In the end, for all the very successful bilateral dialogues, the main contentious aspect is this: full unity around the table. To this end, this paper explores an important document, Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry, also called the Lima document. It was hailed as a very important document which underscored a number of understandings of the centripetal roles of baptism, eucharist and ministry. Looking back at the document and the liturgical ramifications, the supreme example being the Lima liturgy, can be of great help in establishing a trajectory towards an authentic worship between the different Christians of good faith.
D’CostaGavin.2010. “Receptive Ecumenism and the Call to Catholic Learning. Exploring a Way for Contemporary Ecumenism.” Reviews in Religion and Theology17 (3): 403–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9418.2010.00605.x.
4.
EliotThomas Stearns. 1943. Burnt Norton: No. 1 of Four Quartets. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
5.
HawkesGeraldine.2024. “Receptive Ecumenism: A Journey in Patience, Love and Humility.” Lutheran Theological Journal58 (2): 93–101.
HellerDagmar. 2004. “Ecumenical Worship – Experiences, Problems and Possibilities: Some Basic Considerations.” In Worship Today: Understanding, Practice, Ecumenical Implications, Faith and Order Paper no. 194, edited by BestThomas F.HellerDagmar, 232–246. Geneva: WCC.
8.
The Holy See. Code of Canon Law: Latin-English Edition. 1983. Translated by Canon Law Society of America. Washington, DC: CLSA. Promulgated by Pope John Paul II, Apostolic Constitution Sacrae Disciplinae Leges (25 January 1983).
MeyendorffPaul. 2004. “Ecumenical Prayer: An Orthodox Perspective.” In Worship Today: Understanding, Practice, Ecumenical Implications, Faith and Order Paper no. 194, edited by BestThomas F.HellerDagmar, 247–251. Geneva: WCC.
11.
MurrayPaul D., ed. 2008. Receptive Ecumenism and the Call to Catholic Learning: Exploring a Way for Contemporary Ecumenism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
NewmanJohn Henry. 1890. An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine. 7th ed. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.
13.
NissiotisNikos A. 1985. “The Meaning of Reception in Relation to the Results of Ecumenical Dialogue on the Basis of the Faith and Order Document, ‘Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry’.” In Orthodox Perspectives on “Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry”, edited by LimourisGennadiosVaporis,N. M.Inter-Orthodox Symposium on Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry, 47–74. Brookline, MA: Holy Cross Orthodox Press.
RuschWilliam G. 2007. Ecumenical Reception: Its Challenge and Opportunity. Grand Rapids, MI and Cambridge, UK: Eerdmans.
16.
RyanGregory A.2018. “‘Receiving with Dynamic Integrity’: Ecumenical Commitments and Reception Hermeneutics.” In Receptive Ecumenism: Listening, Learning and Loving in the Way of Christ, edited by BalabanskiVickyHawkesGeraldine, 135–148. Adelaide: ATF Press.
SkładanowskiMarcin.2012. “The Lima Statement on Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry: A Testimony of our Common Faith.” Sacrum Ministerium1–2: 158–166.
19.
TaftRobert. 2013. “Perceptions and Realities in Orthodox-Catholic Relations Today: Reflections on the Past, Prospects for the Future.” In Orthodox Constructions of the West, edited by DemacopoulosGeorge E.PapanikolaouAristotle, 23–44. New York: Fordham University Press.
20.
ThiessenGesa Elsbeth. 2009. “Seeking Unity: Reflecting on Methods in Contemporary Ecumenical Dialogue.” In Ecumenical Ecclesiology: Unity, Diversity and Otherness in a Fragmented World, edited by ThiessenGesa Esbeth, Ecclesiological Investigations, series 5,35–48. London and New York: T&T Clark.
21.
VischerLukas.2002. “The Convergence Texts on Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry: How Did They Take Shape? What Have They Achieved?” The Ecumenical Review54 (4): 431–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-6623.2002.tb00164.x.
World Council of Churches. 1982. Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry. Faith and Order Paper 111. Geneva: WCC.
24.
WoudaFokke. 2022. Eucharistic Hospitality in Ecumenical Settings: Learning from Monastic Experiences. Netherlands Studies in Ritual and Liturgy 26. Groningen: University of Groningen.
25.
ZizioulasJohn.1985. “The Theological Problem of ‘Reception’.” One in Christ21 (3): 188–193.
