Intergenerational educational mobility reflects a welfare state's ability to provide citizens with opportunities to climb the social ladder. Representing two distinct welfare state types, studies have contrasted mobility patterns in Scandinavia and the United States but have provided no consistent answer as to who achieves the highest level of intergenerational educational mobility. We conduct a meticulous examination of intergenerational educational mobility in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the United States for cohorts born between 1958 and 1987 using comparable operationalizations and methods and the best available data (administrative data in Scandinavia and eight surveys in the United States). We focus on methods that capture relative mobility. Across models, we find that inequality in Scandinavia is 20 percent to 30 percent lower than in the United States. A multiverse analysis, which can run a large number of models within a single framework, shows that our results are robust to alternative variable specifications.
AlthamPatricia M. E.1970. “The Measurement of Association of Rows and Columns for an r × s Contingency Table.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Methodological32(1):63–73.
2.
AndradeStefan B.ThomsenJens Peter. 2018. “Intergenerational Educational Mobility in Denmark and the United States.”Sociological Science5:93–113.
3.
AndradeStefan B.ThomsenJens-Peter. 2021. “Yes, Denmark Is a More Educationally Mobile Society than the United States: Rejoinder to Kristian Karlson.”Sociological Science8:359–70.
4.
BergerThorEngzellPerErikssonBjörnMolinderJakob. 2023. “Social Mobility in Sweden before the Welfare State.”The Journal of Economic History83(2):431–63.
5.
BjörklundAndersJänttiMarkus. 2011. “Intergenerational Income Mobility and the Role of Family Background.” Pp. 491–521 in The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality, edited by NolanB.SalverdaW.SmeedingT. M.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
BlackSandra E.DevereuxPaul J.2011. “Recent Developments in Intergenerational Mobility.” Pp. 1487–541 in Handbook of Labor Economics, edited by AshenfelterO.CardD.Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland.
7.
BlandenJo. 2013. “Cross-Country Rankings in Intergenerational Mobility: A Comparison of Approaches from Economics and Sociology.”Journal of Economic Surveys27(1):38–73.
8.
BlandenJoDoepkeMatthiasStuhlerJan. 2023. “Educational Inequality.” Pp. 405–97 in Handbook of the Economics of Education. Vol. 6, edited by HanushekE. A.MachinS.WoessmannL.Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
9.
Bouchet-ValatMilan. 2022. “General Marginal-Free Association Indices for Contingency Tables: From the Altham Index to the Intrinsic Association Coefficient.”Sociological Methods & Research51(1):203–36.
10.
BreenRichardInJung. 2023. “Paradoxes of Social Mobility in London.”The British Journal of Sociology74(5):781–98.
11.
BreenRichardMüllerWalter. 2020. Education and Intergenerational Social Mobility in Europe and the United States. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
ChettyRajHendrenNathanielKlinePatrickSaezEmmanuel. 2014. “Where Is the Land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States.”The Quarterly Journal of Economics129(4):1553–623.
13.
ChevalierA.DennyKevinMcMahonD.2009. “Intergenerational Mobility and Education Equality.” Pp. 260–81 in Education and Inequality across Europe, edited by DoltonP.AsplundR.BarthE.London, UK: Edward Elgar.
14.
EngzellPerJonssonJan O.2015. “Estimating Social and Ethnic Inequality in School Surveys: Biases from Child Misreporting and Parent Nonresponse.”European Sociological Review31(3):312–25.
15.
EngzellPerMoodCarina. 2023. “Understanding Patterns and Trends in Income Mobility through Multiverse Analysis.”American Sociological Review88(4):600–626.
16.
EriksonRobertGoldthorpeJohn H.1992. The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
17.
Esping-AndersenGosta. 2006. “Social Inheritance and Equal Opportunities Policies.” Pp. 298–408 in Education, Globalization and Social Change, edited by LauderH.BrownP.DillaboughJ.-A.HalseyA. H.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18.
Esping-AndersenGøsta. 2015. “Welfare Regimes and Social Stratification.”Journal of European Social Policy25(1):124–34.
19.
GerringJohn. 2012. “Mere Description.”British Journal of Political Science42(4):721–46.
20.
GoodmanLeo A.1969. “On the Measurement of Social Mobility: An Index of Status Persistence.”American Sociological Review34(6):831–50.
21.
GoodmanLeo A.1996. “A Single General Method for the Analysis of Cross-Classified Data: Reconciliation and Synthesis of Some Methods of Pearson, Yule, and Fisher, and Also Some Methods of Correspondence Analysis and Association Analysis.”Journal of the American Statistical Association91(433):408–28.
22.
GoodmanLeo A.HoutMichael. 1998. “Statistical Methods and Graphical Displays for Analyzing How the Association between Two Qualitative Variables Differs among Countries, among Groups, or over Time: A Modified Regression-Type Approach.”Sociological Methodology28(1):175–230.
23.
HertelFlorian R.PfefferFabian T.2020. “The Land of Opportunity? Trends in Social Mobility and Education in the United States.” Pp. 29–68 in Education and Intergenerational Social Mobility in Europe and the United States, edited by BreenR.MüllerW.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
HertzTomJayasunderaTamaraPirainoPatrizioSelcukSibelSmithNicoleVerashchaginaAlina. 2008. “The Inheritance of Educational Inequality: International Comparisons and Fifty-Year Trends.”The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy7(2):10. http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/vol7/iss2/art10
HoutMichael. 2015. “A Summary of What We Know about Social Mobility.”The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science657(1):27–36.
27.
HoutMichaelDohanDaniel. 1996. “Two Paths to Educational Opportunity: Class and Educational Selection in Sweden and the United States.” Pp. 207–32 in Can Education Be Equalized? The Swedish Case in Comparative Perspective. Vol. 1996, edited by JonssonJ. O.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
28.
HoutMichaelGuestAvery M.2013. “Intergenerational Occupational Mobility in Great Britain and the United States Since 1850: Comment.”American Economic Review103(5):2021–40.
29.
JacksonMichelleHolzmanBrian. 2020. “A Century of Educational Inequality in the United States.”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117(32):19108–15.
30.
JänttiMarkusJenkinsStephen P.2015. “Income Mobility.” Pp. 807–935 in Handbook of Income Distribution. Vol. 2, Handbook of Income Distribution, edited by AtkinsonA. B.BourguignonF.Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
31.
KarlsonKristian B.LandersøRasmus. 2025. “The Making and Unmaking of Opportunity: Educational Mobility in 20th-Century Denmark.”The Scandinavian Journal of Economics127(1):178–212.
32.
LandersøRasmusHeckmanJames J.2017. “The Scandinavian Fantasy: The Sources of Intergenerational Mobility in Denmark and the US.”Scandinavian Journal of Economics119(1):178–230.
33.
LiuQiangDingRuichang. 2020. “Does Poverty Matter or Inequality? An International Comparative Analysis on the Intergenerational Education Persistence.” Pp. 187–205 in Education and Mobilities, Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education. Vol. 2020, edited by ZhuX.LiJ.LiM.LiuQ.StarkeyH.Singapore: Springer.
34.
MitnikPablo A.BryantVictoria L.GruskyDavid B.2024. “A Very Uneven Playing Field: Economic Mobility in the United States.”American Journal of Sociology129(4):1216–76.
OECD. 2014. Education at a Glance 2014: OECD Indicators. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
37.
OECD. 2018. A Broken Social Elevator? How to Promote Social Mobility. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264301085-en.
38.
PfefferFabian T.2008. “Persistent Inequality in Educational Attainment and Its Institutional Context.”European Sociological Review24(5):543–65.
39.
RauscherEmily. 2016. “Does Educational Equality Increase Mobility? Exploiting Nineteenth-Century U.S. Compulsory Schooling Laws.”American Journal of Sociology121(6):1697–761.
40.
ReizelLiza. 2011. “Two Paths to Inequality in Educational Outcomes: Family Background and Educational Selection in the United States and Norway.”Sociology of Education84(4):261–80.
41.
SchoeniRobert F.WiemersEmily E.2015. “The Implications of Selective Attrition for Estimates of Intergenerational Elasticity of Family Income.”The Journal of Economic Inequality13(3):351–72.
42.
ShavitYossiParkHyunjoon. 2016. “Introduction to a Special Issue: Education as a Positional Good.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility43:1–3.
43.
SteegenSaraTuerlinckxFrancisGelmanAndrewVanpaemelWolf. 2016. “Increasing Transparency through a Multiverse Analysis.”Perspectives on Psychological Science11(5):702–12.
44.
StrömbergElyEngzellPer. 2025. “How Robust Are Country Rankings in Educational Mobility?”Sociological Science 12:891–922.
45.
ThaningMaxHällstenMartin. 2020. “The End of Dominance? Evaluating Measures of Socio-economic Background in Stratification Research.”European Sociological Review36(4):533–47.
46.
XieYu. 1992. “The Log-Multiplicative Layer Effect Model for Comparing Mobility Tables.”American Sociological Review57(3):380–95.
47.
XieYuKillewaldAlexandra. 2013. “Intergenerational Occupational Mobility in Great Britain and the United States since 1850: Comment.”American Economic Review103(5):2003–20.
48.
ZhouXiang. 2015. “Shrinkage Estimation of Log-Odds Ratios for Comparing Mobility Tables.”Sociological Methodology45(1):320–56.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
