Racial equity in education is often framed around “closing the achievement gap,” but many scholars argue this frame perpetuates deficit mindsets. The “opportunity gap” (OG) frame has been offered as an alternative to focus attention on structural injustices. In a preregistered survey experiment, I estimate the effects of framing racial equity in education around “achievement gaps” (AGs) versus OGs. I find U.S. adult respondents on MTurk gave higher priority to “closing the racial opportunity gap” versus “closing the racial achievement gap” (effect size = 0.11 SD). When randomly assigned to read an OG frame before being asked to explain the Black/White “achievement gap,” respondents were less likely to endorse cultural or individual-level explanations compared with respondents only shown AG statistics (effect size = –0.10 SD). I find no evidence the OG frame affected respondents’ racial stereotypes or policy preferences.
AikmanSheilaRobinson-PantAnnaMcGrathSimonM. JereCatherineCheffyIanThemelisSpyrosRogersAlan. 2016. “Challenging Deficit Discourses in International Education and Development.” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education46(2):314–34.
2.
AllenDanielle. 2016. Education and Equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BenfordRobert D.SnowDavid A.2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology26:611–39.
4.
BerinskyAdam J.HuberGegory A.LenzGabriel S.2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis20(3):351–68.
5.
BrighouseHarryLaddHelen F.LoebSusannaSwiftAdam. 2018. Educational Goods: Values, Evidence, and Decision-Making. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
CareyRoderick L.2014. “A Cultural Analysis of the Achievement Gap Discourse: Challenging the Language and Labels Used in the Work of School Reform.” Urban Education49:440–68.
8.
CarterPrudence L.WelnerKevin G., eds. 2013. Closing the Opportunity Gap: What America Must Do to Give Every Child an Even Chance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9.
ChambersTerah Venzant. 2009. “The ‘Receivement Gap’: School Tracking Policies and the Fallacy of the ‘Achievement Gap.’”Journal of Negro Education78:417–31.
10.
ChongDennisDruckmanJames N.2007. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science10:103–26.
11.
ColemanJames S.1968. “The Concept of Equality of Educational Opportunity.” Harvard Educational Review38:7–22.
12.
ComstockMegan. 2024. “Gaps in Achievement or Opportunity?: How Achievement Gap Discourse Affects Teachers’ Beliefs and Instructional Priorities.” Urban Education. doi:10.1177/00420859241279453.
13.
CrossBeverly.E.2007. “Urban School Achievement Gap as a Metaphor to Conceal US Apartheid Education.” Theory into Practice46(3):247–55.
14.
DarbyDerrickRuryJohn L.2018. The Color of Mind: Why the Origins of the Achievement Gap Matter for Justice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Darling-HammondLinda. 2013. “Inequality and School Resources: What It Will Take to Close the Opportunity Gap.” Pp. 77–97 in Closing the Opportunity Gap: What America Must Do to Give Every Child an Even Chance, edited by CarterP. L.WelnerK. G.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
DonaghyTimothy Q.HealyNoelJiangCharles Y.BattleColette Pichon. 2023. “Fossil Fuel Racism in the United States: How Phasing out Coal, Oil, and Gas Can Protect Communities.” Energy Research & Social Science100:103104. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2023.103104.
17.
EdmondsRonaldBillingsleyAndrewComerJamesDyerJames M.HallWilliamHillRobertMcGeheeNanReddickLawrenceTaylorHoward F.WrightStephen. 1973. “A Black Response to Christopher Jencks’s Inequality and Certain Other Issues.” Harvard Educational Review43(1):76–91.
18.
EwingEve L.2018. Ghosts in the Schoolyard. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
GoffmanErving. 1974. Frame Analysis. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
20.
GreszkiRobertMeyerMarcoSchoenHarald. 2015. “Exploring the Effects of Removing ‘Too Fast’ Responses and Respondents from Web Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly79(2):471–503.
21.
GutiérrezRochelle. 2008. “Research Commentary: A Gap-Gazing Fetish in Mathematics Education? Problematizing Research on the Achievement Gap.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education39(4):357–64.
22.
HardistyDavid J.JohnsonEric J.WeberElke U.2010. “A Dirty Word or a Dirty World? Attribute Framing, Political Affiliation, and Query Theory.” Psychological Science21(1):86–92.
23.
HauserDavid J.SchwarzNorbert. 2015. “It’s a Trap! Instructional Manipulation Checks Prompt Systematic Thinking on ‘Tricky’ Tasks.” SAGE Open5(2). doi:10.1177/2158244015584617.
24.
HilliardAsa G.2003. “No Mystery: Closing the Achievement Gap between Africans and Excellence.” Pp. 131–65 in Young, Gifted, and Black: Promoting High Achievement among African American Students, edited by PerryT.SteeleC.HilliardA. G.Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
25.
HochschildJennifer L.ScovronickNathan. 2003. The American Dream and the Public Schools. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26.
HoweKenneth R.1989. “In Defense of Outcomes-Based Conceptions of Equal Educational Opportunity.” Educational Theory39:317–36.
27.
HoweKenneth R.1992. “Liberal Democracy, Equal Educational Opportunity, and the Challenge of Multiculturalism.” American Educational Research Journal29:455–70.
28.
IngramHelen M.SchneiderAnne. 2015. “Making Distinctions: The Social Construction of Target Populations.” Pp. 259–73 in Handbook of Critical Policy Studies, edited by FischerF.TorgersonD.DurnovaA.OrsiniM.Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
29.
IrvineJacqueline Jordan. 2010. “Foreword.” Pp. xi–xv in Culture, Curriculum, and Identity in Education, edited by Milner IVH. R.New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
JeffersChike. 2019. “Cultural Constructivism.” Pp. 38–72 in What Is Race?: Four Philosophical Views, edited by GlasgowJ.HaslangerS.JeffersC.SpencerQ.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31.
JencksChristopher. 1988. “Whom Must We Treat Equally for Educational Opportunity to Be Equal?”Ethics98:518–33.
32.
Jiménez-CastellanosOscarFarrieDanielleQuinnDavid M.2022. “Toward Transformative Justice in School Finance.” Pp. 194–211 in Our Children Can’t Wait: The Urgency of Reinventing Education Policy in America, edited by BishopJ. P.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
33.
KuchirkoYanaNayfeldIrena. 2021. “Ethnic-Racial Socialization in the Context of the Achievement Gap Discourse.” Journal of Social Issues77(4):1174–87.
34.
KungFranki Y. H.KwokNavioBrownDouglas J.2018. “Are Attention Check Questions a Threat to Scale Validity?”Applied Psychology67(2):264–83.
35.
KuziemkoIlyanaNortonMichael I.SaezEmmanuelStantchevaStefanie. 2015. “How Elastic Are Preferences for Redistribution? Evidence from Randomized Survey Experiments.” The American Economic Review105(4):1478–508.
36.
LadenAnthony Simon. 2013. “Learning to Be Equal: Just Schools as Schools of Justice.” Pp. 62–79 in Education, Justice, and Democracy, edited by AllenD.ReichR.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Ladson-BillingsGloria. 2006. “From the Achievement Gap to the Education Debt: Understanding Achievement in U. S. Schools.” Education Researcher35:3–12.
38.
Ladson-BillingsGloria. 2007. “Pushing Past the Achievement Gap: An Essay on the Language of Deficit.” The Journal of Negro Education76:316–23.
39.
Ladson-BillingsGloria. 2013. “Lack of Achievement or Loss of Opportunity?” Pp. 11–22 in Closing the Opportunity Gap: What America Must Do to Give Every Child an Even Chance, edited by CarterP. L.WelnerK. G.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
40.
LakoffGeorge. 2010. “Why It Matters How We Frame the Environment.” Environmental Communication4(1):70–81.
41.
LechelerSophiede VreeseClaes H.2019. News Framing Effects. New York, NY: Routledge.
42.
LevinIrwin P.SchneiderSandra L.GaethGary J.1998. “All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Topology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes76(2):149–88.
43.
LevinsonMeiraGeronTatianaBrighouseHarry. 2022. “Conceptions of Educational Equity.” AERA Open8(1). doi:10.1177/23328584221121344.
44.
LewisChance W.JamesMarlonHancockStephenHill-JacksonValerie. 2008. “Framing African American Students’ Success and Failure in Urban Settings.” Urban Education43(2):127–53.
45.
LoveBarbara J.2004. “Brown Plus 50 Counter-Storytelling: A Critical Race Theory Analysis of the ‘Majoritarian Achievement Gap’ Story.” Equity & Excellence in Education37(3):227–46.
MettlerSuzanneSossJoe. 2004. “The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics.” Perspectives on Politics2:55–73.
NelsonThomas E.OxleyZoe M.ClawsonRosalee A.1997. “Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects.” Political Behavior19(3):221–46.
55.
Patton DavisLoriMuseusSamuel. 2019. “What Is Deficit Thinking? An Analysis of Conceptualizations of Deficit Thinking and Implications for Scholarly Research.” Currents1(1):117–30.
56.
PerryTheresa. 2003. “Up from the Parched Earth: Toward a Theory of African-American Achievement.” Pp. 1–10 in Young, Gifted, and Black: Promoting High Achievement among African American Students, edited by PerryT.SteeleC.HilliardA. G.Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
57.
PinkerSteven. 1994. “The Name of the Game.” The New York Times, April5, A21.
58.
QuinnDavid M.2020. “Experimental Effects of ‘Achievement Gap’ News Reporting on Viewers’ Racial Stereotypes, Inequality Explanations, and Inequality Prioritization.” Educational Researcher49:482–92.
59.
QuinnDavid M.2023. “Framing Effects and the Public’s Attitudes toward Racial Equity in Education Policy.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. doi:10.3102/01623737231200202.
60.
QuinnDavid M.DesruisseauxTara-Marie. 2022. “Replicating and Extending Effects of ‘Achievement Gap’ Discourse.” Educational Researcher51:496–99.
ReichRobert. 2013. “Equality, Adequacy, and K-12 Education.” Pp. 43–61 in Education, Justice, and Democracy, edited by AllenD.ReichR.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
63.
ReskinBarbara. 2012. “The Race Discrimination System.” Annual Review of Sociology38:17–35.
64.
RiosVictor. 2012. “From ‘At-Risk’ to ‘At-Promise’: Supporting Teens to Overcome Adversity.” Produced by TED Talkx, December15. Video, 13:21. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZ5D_Je8tvo.
ScheufeleDietram A.TewksburyDavid. 2007. “Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models.” Journal of Communication57(1):9–20.
67.
SchoutenGina. 2012. “Educational Justice: Closing Gaps or Paying Debts?”Journal of Applied Philosophy29(3):231–42.
SmithTom W.DavernMichaelFreeseJeremyMorganStephen L.2019. General Social Surveys, 1972-2018: Cumulative Codebook. National Data Program for the Social Sciences Series, no. 25. Chicago, IL: NORC.
70.
ToldsonIvory A.2019a. No BS (Bad Stats). Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
ValantJonNewarkDaniel. 2016. “The Politics of Achievement Gaps: US Public Opinion on Race-Based and Wealth-Based Differences in Test Scores.” Educational Researcher45(6):331–46.
YoungIris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
