Debates in education policy draw on different theories about how to raise children’s achievement. The school competition theory holds that achievement rises when students can choose among competing schools. The school resources theory holds that achievement rises with schools’ resources per student. The family resources theory holds that achievement rises as parents become more educated and earn higher incomes. We test all three theories in Chile between 2002 and 2013, when reading and math scores rose by 0.2 to 0.3 standard deviations, as school competition, school resources, and family resources all increased. We compare Chilean municipalities in a difference-in-differences analysis, asking whether test scores rose fastest in municipalities with greater increases in school competition, school resources, or family resources. We find that municipal test scores did not rise with school competition but did rise with family resources (parental education, not income) and, to a smaller extent, with school resources (as measured by class sizes). Results favor the family resource theory, and to a lesser extent the school resource theory, but not the school competition theory.
AttewellPaulLavinDavidDominaThurstonLeveyTania. 2007. Passing the Torch: Does Higher Education for the Disadvantaged Pay Off across the Generations?New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
3.
AugusteSebastianValenzuelaJuan Pablo. 2004. “Do Student Benefit from School Competition? Evidence from Chile.” PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
4.
BelfieldCliveLevinHenry. 2002. “The Effects of Competition between Schools on Educational Outcomes: A Review for the United States.”Review of Educational Research72(2):279–341.
5.
Brooks-GunnJeanneDuncanGregMaritatoNancy. 1999. “Poor Families, Poor Outcomes: The Well-Being of Children and Youth.” Pp. 1–17 in Consequences of Growing Up Poor, edited by DuncanG.Brooks-GunnJ.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
6.
CameronColinMillerDouglas. 2015. “A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference.”Journal of Human Resources50(2):317–72.
7.
CandelariaChristopher A.ShoresKenneth A.2017. “Court-Ordered Finance Reforms in the Adequacy Era: Heterogeneous Causal Effects and Sensitivity.”Education Finance and Policy 14(1):31–60.
8.
CarpenterDickKaferKrista. 2012. “A History of Private School Choice.”Peabody Journal of Education87(3):336–50.
9.
Cartagena FariasJavieraMcIntoshSteven. 2019. “Does the Increase in Competition between Schools Improve the Quality of the Service? The Role of Educational Reform in Chile.”Journal of Development Studies 55(8):1799–815.
10.
Casen. 2013. Casen 2013: Situación de la Pobreza en Chile. Santiago, Chile: Ministerio de Desarrollo Social.
11.
ChettyRajHendrenNathanielKatzLawrence. 2016. “The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment.”American Economic Review106(4):855–902.
ColemanJamesCampbellE.HobsonC. F.MoodA. M.WeinfeldF. D.YorkR. L.1966. Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
14.
ColemanJamesHofferThomasKilgoreSally. 1982. High School Achievement: Public, Catholic, and Private Schools Compared. New York: Basic Books.
15.
ColemanJames S.1992. “Some Points on Choice in Education.”Sociology of Education65(4):260–62.
16.
DahlGordonLochnerLance. 2012. “The Impact of Family Income on Child Achievement: Evidence from the Earned Income Tax Credit.”American Economic Review102(5):1927–56.
17.
Davis-KeanPamela. 2005. “The Influence of Parent Education and Family Income on Child Achievement: The Indirect Role of Parental Expectations and the Home Environment.”Journal of Family Psychology19(2):294.
18.
DuncanGreg J.MorrisPamela A.RodriguesChris. 2011. “Does Money Really Matter? Estimating Impacts of Family Income on Young Children’s Achievement with Data from Random-Assignment Experiments.”Developmental Psychology47(5):1263–79.
ElderToddJepsenChristopher. 2014. “Are Catholic Primary Schools More Effective Than Public Primary Schools?”Journal of Urban Economics80:28–38.
21.
FriedmanMilton. 1955. “The Role of Government in Education.” Pp. 123–44 in Economics and the Public Interest, edited by SoloR.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
22.
FriedmanMilton. 1962. “The Role of Government in Education.” Pp. 85–107 in Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
GallegoFrancisco. 2013. “When Does Inter-school Competition Matter? Evidence from the Chilean ‘Voucher’ System.”BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy13(2):525–62.
24.
GlassGene. 1982. School Class Size: Research and Policy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
GreenwaldRobHedgesLarryLaineRichard. 1996. “Interpreting Research on School Resources and Student Achievement: A Rejoinder to Hanushek.”Review of Educational Research66(3):411.
27.
GuryanJonathanHurstErikKearneyMelissa. 2008. “Parental Education and Parental Time with Children.”Journal of Economic Perspectives22(3):23–46.
28.
HanushekEric. 1989. “The Impact of Differential Expenditures on School Performance.”Educational Researcher18(4):45–62.
29.
HanushekEric A.2003. “The Failure of Input-Based Schooling Policies.”Economic Journal113(485):F64–98.
30.
HanushekEricPetersonPaulTalpeyLauraWoessmannLudger. 2019. The Unwavering SES Achievement Gap: Trends in US Student Performance. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
31.
HavemanRobertWolfeBarbara. 1995. “The Determinants of Children’s Attainments: A Review of Methods and Findings.”Journal of Economic Literature33(4):1829–78.
32.
HedgesLarryLaineRichardGreenwaldRob. 1994. “An Exchange: Part 1. Does Money Matter? A Meta-analysis of Studies of the Effects of Differential School Inputs on Student Outcomes.”Educational Researcher23(3):5–14.
33.
HofflingerAlvaro. 2015. “Do Competition and Accountability Improve Quality of Education? The Chilean Case from 2002 to 2013.” PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
34.
HoxbyCaroline. 2000. “Does Competition among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers?”American Economic Review90(5):1209–38.
35.
HoxbyCaroline. 2007. “Does Competition among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers? Reply.”American Economic Review97(5):2038–55.
36.
HsiehChang-TaiUrquiolaMiguel. 2006. “The Effects of Generalized School Choice on Achievement and Stratification: Evidence from Chile’s Voucher Program.”Journal of Public Economics90(8/9):1477–1503.
37.
JacksonKirabo. 2018. “Does School Spending Matter? The New Literature on an Old Question.” Working Paper No. 25368, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
38.
JacksonKiraboJohnsonRuckerPersicoClaudia. 2016. “The Effects of School Spending on Educational and Economic Outcomes: Evidence from School Finance Reforms.”Quarterly Journal of Economics131(1):157–218.
JencksChristopher S.1972. “The Coleman Report and the Conventional Wisdom.” Pp. 69–115 in On Equity of Educational Opportunity, edited by MostellerF.MoynihanD. P.New York: Vintage Books.
LafortuneJulienRothsteinJesseSchanzenbachDiane. 2018. “School Finance Reform and the Distribution of Student Achievement.”American Economic Journal: Applied Economics10(2):1–26.
43.
LaraBernardoMizalaAlejandraRepettoAndrea. 2011. “The Effectiveness of Private Voucher Education: Evidence from Structural School Switches.”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis33(2):119–37.
44.
LordFrederic. 1980. Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
LubienskiChristopherLubienskiSarah. 2013. The Public School Advantage: Why Public Schools Outperform Private Schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46.
MayerSusan E.1997. What Money Can’t Buy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
Mineduc. 2003. Reforma Constitucional Que Establece La Obligatoriedad y Gratuidad de La Educación Media. Law 19876. Santiago, Chile: Ministry of Education.
48.
Mineduc. 2005. Establece Normas Para El Financiamiento de Estudios de Educación Superior. Law 20027. Santiago, Chile: Ministry of Education.
49.
Ministerio de Desarrollo Social. 2016. Escolaridad Promedio de Los Chilenos Aumentó a 11 Años En 2015. Santiago, Chile: Author.
50.
ReardonSean F.2011. “The Widening Academic Achievement Gap between the Rich and the Poor: New Evidence and Possible Explanations Social Inequalities and Educational Disadvantage.” Pp. 91–116 in Social Inequalities and Educational Disadvantage, edited by MurnaneG. B. I.R MDuncan. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
51.
ReardonSean F.CheadleJacobRobinsonJoseph. 2009. “The Effect of Catholic Schooling on Math and Reading Development in Kindergarten through Fifth Grade.”Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness2(1):45–87.
52.
RothsteinJesse. 2007a. “Does Competition among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers? Comment.”American Economic Review97(5):2026–37.
SantosHumbertoElacquaGregory. 2016. “Segregación Socioeconómica Escolar En Chile: Elección de La Escuela Por Los Padres y Un Análisis Contrafactual Teórico.”Revista CEPAL119:133–48.
55.
SchneiderMarkBuckleyJackElacquaGregory. 2006. “School Choice in Chile: Is It Class or the Classroom?”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management25(3):577–601.
56.
ShakeelM. DanishAndersonKaitlinWolfPatrick. 2016. “The Participant Effects of Private School Vouchers across the Globe: A Meta-analytic and Systematic Review.” EDRE Working Paper No. 2016-07. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2777633 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2777633
57.
SilvaPatricio. 1991. “Technocrats and Politics in Chile: From the Chicago Boys to the CIEPLAN Monks.”Journal of Latin American Studies23(2):385–410.
58.
von HippelPaulHamrockCaitlin. 2019. “Do Test Score Gaps Grow before, during, or between the School Years? Measurement Artifacts and What We Can Know in Spite of Them.”Sociological Science6:43–80.
59.
von HippelPaulHunterDavidDrownMcKalie. 2017. “Better Estimates from Binned Income Data: Interpolated CDFs and Mean-Matching.”Sociological Science4:641–55.
60.
von HippelPaulWorkmanJosephDowneyDouglas. 2018. “Inequality in Reading and Math Skills Forms Mainly before Kindergarten: A Replication, and Partial Correction, of ‘Are Schools the Great Equalizer?’”Sociology of Education91(4):323–57.
61.
WeylandKurt. 1999. “Economic Policy in Chile’s New Democracy.”Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs41(3):67–96.
62.
WhitehurstGrover. 2016. Family Support or School Readiness? Contrasting Models of Public Spending on Children’s Early Care and Learning. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
