Sociologists have focused almost exclusively on academic aspects of status in higher education, despite the prominence of nonacademic activities, specifically athletics, in U.S. colleges and universities. We use the case of football to investigate whether intercollegiate sports influence the distribution of status in U.S. higher education. Analyzing data on conference affiliations and other organizational characteristics of 287 schools over time, we find evidence of an athletic status system. Our work expands understanding of status in U.S. higher education, enriches prior explanations for the prominence of football, and generates tractable insights about the ongoing evolution of the intercollegiate conference system.
AghionPhilippeDewatripontMathiasHoxbyCaroline M.Mas-ColellAndreuSapirAndré. 2009. “The Governance and Performance of Research Universities: Evidence from Europe and the U.S.” NBER Working Paper No. 14851.
2.
ArmstrongElizabeth A.HamiltonLaura T.2013. Paying for the Party: How College Maintains Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BaronReuben. M.KennyDavid A.1986. “The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Considerations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6):1173-82.
4.
BenjaminBeth A.PodolnyJoel M.1999. “Status, Quality, and Social Order in the California Wine Industry.” Administrative Science Quarterly44(3):563-89.
5.
BlauPeter M.1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
6.
BostocMikeCarterShanQuealyKevin. 2013. “Tracing the History of NCAA Conferences.” New York Times, November30.
7.
BowenWilliam G.LevinSarah A.2003. Reclaiming the Game: College Sports and Educational Values. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
BrewerDominic J.GatesSusan M.GoldmanCharles A.2002. In Pursuit of Prestige: Strategy and Competition in U.S. Higher Education. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers/RAND.
9.
BrintStevenRiddleMarkHannemanRobert A.2006. “Reference Sets, Identities, and Aspirations in a Complex Organizational Field: The Case of American Four-year Colleges and Universities.” Sociology of Education79(3):229-52.
10.
ClotfelterCharles T.2011. Big-time Sports in American Universities. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
FulksDaniel L.2009. Revenues/Expenses: 2004-08 NCAA Revenues and Expenses of Division I Intercollegiate Athletics Programs Report. Indianapolis, IN: The National Collegiate Athletic Association.
13.
GeertzClifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
14.
GoodeWilliam J.1978. The Celebration of Heroes: Prestige as a Control System. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15.
HoxbyCaroline M.2009. “The Changing Selectivity of American Colleges.” Journal of Economic Perspectives23(4):95-118.
16.
JencksChristopherRiesmanDavid. 1968. The Academic Revolution. New York: Doubleday.
17.
KarabelJerome. 2005. The Chosen: The Hidden History of Admission and Exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
18.
KraatzMatthew S.1998. “Learning by Association? Interorganizational Networks and Adaption to Environmental Change.” Academy of Management Journal41:621-23.
19.
KraatzMatthew S.BlockEmily S.2008. “Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism.” Pp. 243-75 in Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.Sahlin-AnderssonK.London: Sage.
20.
LamontMichèleMolnárViràg. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries across the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology28:167-95.
21.
LucasChristopher J.1994. American Higher Education: A History. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.
22.
MillsC. Wright. 1963. “The Sociology of Stratification.” Pp. 305-24 in Power, Politics, and People: The Collected Essays of C. Wright Mills, edited by HorowitzI. L.New York: Oxford.
23.
ParkinFrank. 1979. Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique. New York: Praeger.
24.
PodolnyJoel M.2005. Status Signals. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
PopeDevin G.PopeJaren C. 2014. “Understanding College Application Decisions: Why College Sports Success Matters.” Journal of Sports Economics15(2):107-31.
26.
PoracJoseph F.ThomasHowardWilsonFionaPatonDouglasKanferAlaina. 1995. “Rivalry and the Industry of Scottish Knitwear Producers.” Administrative Science Quarterly40(2):203-27.
27.
PowellWalter W.WhiteDouglas R.KoputKenneth W.Owen-SmithJason. 2004. “Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Inter-organizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences.” American Journal of Sociology110(4):1132-205.
28.
RudolphFrederick. 1962. The American College and University: A History. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
29.
SauderMichael. 2006. “Third Parties and Status Position: How the Characteristics of Status Systems Matter.” Theory and Society35(3):299-321.
30.
SauderMichaelEspelandWendy Nelson. 2009. “The Discipline of Rankings: Tight Coupling and Organizational Change.” American Sociological Review74(1):63-82.
31.
SauderMichaelLynnFredaPodolnyJoel. 2012. “Status: Insights from Organizational Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology37:267-83.
32.
SchudsonMichael S.1972. “Organizing the ‘Meritocracy’: A History of the College Entrance Examination Board.” Harvard Educational Review42:34-69.
33.
ShulmanJames L.BowenWilliam G.2001. The Game of Life: College Sports and Educational Values. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
34.
SilverNate. 2012. “Small Payoff in Expansion by Big Ten.” New York Times, November21, p. B3.
35.
SperberMurray A.2000. Beer and Circus: How Big-time College Sports Is Crippling Undergraduate Education. New York: Henry Holt.
36.
SternRobert N.1979. “The Development of an Interorganizational Control Network: The Case of Intercollegiate Athletics.” Administrative Science Quarterly24:242-66.
37.
StevensMitchell L.2007. Creating a Class: College Admissions and the Education of Elites. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
StevensMitchell L.ArmstrongElizabeth A.ArumRichard. 2008. “Sieve, Incubator, Temple, Hub: Recent Empirical and Theoretical Advances in the Sociology of Higher Education.” Annual Review of Sociology34:127-51.
39.
StinchcombeArthur L.1965. “Social Structure and Organizations.” Pp. 142-93 in Handbook of Organizations, edited by MarchJ. G.Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
40.
StoryRonald. 1980. Harvard and the Boston Upper Class: The Forging of an Aristocracy, 1800-1870. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
41.
StraussBen. 2013. “The Big Ten’s Bigger Footprint,” New York Times, December1, p. BU1.
42.
SuggsWelch. 2005. A Place on the Team: The Triumph and Tragedy of Title IX. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
ThelinJohn R.2004. A History of American Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
44.
ToyodaMasashiKitsuregawaMasaru. 2003. “Web Community Chart: A Tool for Navigating the Web and Observing its Evolution.” IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems E86-D:1024-1031.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Various years. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). Accessed August 25, 2011 (http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/datacenter/)
47.
U.S. News and World Report. Various years. “America’s Best Colleges.”
48.
WashingtonMarvinZajacEd J.2005. “Status Evolution and Competition: Theory and Evidence.” The Academy of Management Journal48(2):282-96.
49.
WeberMax. 1946. “The ‘Rationalization’ of Education and Training.” Pp. 240-44 in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by GerthH. H.Wright MillsC.New York: Oxford University Press.
50.
WeberMax. 1978. Economy and Society. Editors RothG.WittichC.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
51.
WechslerHarold S.1977. The Qualified Student: A History of Selective College Admission in America. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
52.
WilliamsonOliver E.1981. “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach.” American Journal of Sociology87(3):548-77.
53.
WinstonGordon C.1999. “The Awkward Economics of Higher Education.” Journal of Economic Perspectives13:13-36.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
