This study assesses the effects of three aspects of school organization—student enrollment, student-teacher ratio, and the number of different students taught—on the property and personal victimization experiences of students. It hypothesizes that smaller schools, schools with lower ratios of students to adults, and schools in which the number of different students taught by the typical teacher is lower will produce less victimization because of the increased social capital to which students in these schools are exposed. Using data from the National Study of Delinquency Prevention in Schools, the authors find that, net of individual-level risk factors and confounding characteristics of schools and their surrounding communities, each of the three aspects of school organization is related to student victimization but that these effects vary across victimization type. Their research suggests that reducing the ratio of students to teachers and reducing the number of different students taught by the average teacher are likely to reduce student victimization. Reducing school size is not. The authors also find evidence that higher levels of social capital, as measured by student consensus about normative beliefs, partially mediate the effects of student-teacher ratio on personal victimization.
ArumRichard. 2003. Judging School Discipline: The Crisis of Moral Authority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
BastianLisa D.TaylorBruce M.1991. School Crime. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
3.
BattistichVictorHomAllen. 1997. “The Relationship Between Students’ Sense of Their School as a Community and Their Involvement in Problem Behavior.” American Journal of Public Health87:1997-2001.
4.
BrykAnthony S.DriscollMary E.1988. The High School as Community: Contextual Influences and Consequences for Students and Teachers. Madison: University of Wisconsin, National Center on Effective Secondary Schools.
5.
BrykAnthonyRaudenbushStephen. 1992. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
BrykAnthony S.SchneiderBarbara. 2002. Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for Improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
7.
BurrowJohnApelRobert. 2008. “Youth Behavior, School Structure, and Student Risk of Victimization.” Justice Quarterly25:349-80.
8.
CernkovichStephen A.GiordanoPeggy C.1992. “School Bonding, Race, and Delinquency.” Criminology30:261-91.
9.
ChandlerKathryn A.ChapmanChristopher D.RandMichael R.TaylorBruce M.1998. Students’ Reports of School Crime: 1989 and 1995. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education and Justice.
10.
ColemanJames S.1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology94:S95-S120.
11.
CookPhilip J.GottfredsonDenise C.NaChongmin. 2010. “School Crime Control and Prevention.” in Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Vol. 39, edited by TonryMichael. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Also available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1368292.)
12.
DemarayMichelle K.MaleckiChristine K.2003. “Carrying a Weapon to School and Perceptions of Social Support in an Urban Middle School.” Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders11:169-78.
13.
DevineJohn. 1995. “Can Metal Detectors Replace the Panopticon?” Cultural Anthropology10:171-95.
14.
DinkesRachelKempJanaBaumKatrina. 2009. Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2008. NCES 2009-022/NCJ 226343. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
15.
DynarskiMarkGleasonPhilipRangarajanAnuWoodRobert. 1998. Impacts of Dropout Prevention Programs: Final Report. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
16.
ElliotDerbert S.HamburgBeatrix A.WilliamsKirk R.1998. Violence in American Schools. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
EndersCraig K.TofighiDavood. 2007. “Centering Predictor Variables in Cross-sectional Multilevel Models: A New Look at an Old Issue.” Psychological Methods12:121-38.
18.
FelnerRobert D.AdanAngela M.1988. “The School Transitional Environment Project: An Ecological Intervention and Evaluation.” Pp. 111-22 in 14 Ounces of Prevention: A Casebook for Practitioners, edited by PriceR. H.CowenE. L.LorionR. P.Ramos-McKayJ.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19.
GottfredsonDenise C.1990. “Changing School Structures to Benefit High-risk Youths.” Pp. 246-71 in Understanding Troubled and Troubling Youth: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, edited by LeoneP. E.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
GottfredsonDenise C.WilsonDavid B.NajakaStacy S.2002. “School-based Crime Prevention” Pp. 56-164 in Evidence-based Crime Prevention, edited by ShermanLawrence W.FarringtonDavid P.WelshBrandon C.MacKenzieDoris L.London: Routledge.
21.
GottfredsonGary D.GottfredsonDenise C.1985. Victimization in Schools. New York: Plenum Press.
22.
GottfredsonGary D.GottfredsonDenise C.1999. Development and Applications of Theoretical Measures for Evaluating Drug and Delinquency Prevention Programs: Technical Manual for Research Editions of What about You (WAY). Ellicott City, MD: Gottfredson Associates.
23.
GottfredsonGary D.GottfredsonDenise C.2001. “What Schools Do to Prevent Delinquency and Promote Safe Environments.” Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation12:313-44.
24.
GottfredsonGary D.GottfredsonDenise C.CzehEllen R.CantorDavidCrosseScott B.HantmanIrene. 2000. A National Study of Delinquency Prevention in School Final Report. Ellicott City, MD: Gottfredson Associates. (Also available at: http://www.gottfredson.com/national.htm.)
25.
GottfredsonGary D.GottfredsonDenise C.GottfredsonNisha C.JonesElizabeth M.2003. Community Characteristics, Staffing Difficulty, and School Disorder in a National Sample of Secondary Schools. Technical report available from the authors.
26.
GottfredsonGary D.GottfredsonDenise C.PayneAllison AnneGottfredsonNisha C.2005. “School Climate Predictors of School Disorder: Results from the National Study of Delinquency Prevention in Schools.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency42:412-44.
27.
HirschiTravis. 1969. Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
HoffmannJohn P.IrelandTimothy O.2004. “Strain and Opportunity Structures.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology20:263-92.
29.
KahneJoseph E.SporteSusan E.de la TorreMarisaEastonJohn Q.2008. “Small High Schools on a Larger Scale: The Impact of School Conversions in Chicago.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis30:281-315.
30.
Khoury-KassabriMonaBenbenishtyRamiAstorRon Avi. 2005. “The Effects of School Climate, Socioeconomics, and Cultural Factors on Student Victimization in Israel.” Social Work Research29:165-80.
31.
Khoury-KassabriMonaBenbenishtyRamiAstorRon AviZeiraAnat. 2004. “The Contributions of Community, Family, and School Variables to Student Victimization.” American Journal of Community Psychology34:187-204.
32.
KirkDavid S.2009. “Unraveling the Contextual Effects on Student Suspension and Juvenile Arrest: The Independent and Interdependent Influences of School, Neighborhood, and Family Social Controls.” Criminology47:479-520.
33.
LeeValerie E.BrykAnthony S.SmithJulia B.1993. “The Organization of Effective Secondary Schools.” Review of Research in Education19:171-267.
34.
LeeValerie E.ReadyDouglas D.2007. Schools within Schools: Possibilities and Pitfalls of High School Reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
35.
LeeValerie E.SmerdonBecky A.Alfred-LiroCorinneBrownShelly L.2000. “Inside Large and Small High Schools: Curriculum and Social Relations.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis22:147-71.
36.
LeeValerie E.SmithJulia B.1995. “Effects of High School Restructuring and Size on Early Gains in Achievement and Engagement.” Sociology of Education68:241-70.
37.
LeeValerie E.SmithJulia B.1997. “What Works Best, and for Whom?” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis19:205-27.
38.
LockwoodDaniel. 1997. Violence among Middle School and High School Students: Analysis and Implications for Prevention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
39.
MaXin. 2002. “Bullying in Middle School: Individual and School Characteristics of Victims and Offenders.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement13:63-89.
40.
MietheTerance D.McDowallDavid. 1993. “Contextual Effects in Models of Criminal Victimization.” Social Forces71:741-59.
41.
MietheTerance D.StaffordMark C.LongJ. Scott. 1987. “Social Differentiation in Criminal Victimization: A Test of Routine Activities/Lifestyle Theories.” American Sociological Review52:184-94.
42.
MorenoffJeffrey D.SampsonRobert J.RaudenbushStephen W.2001. “Neighborhood Inequality, Collective Efficacy, and the Spatial Dynamics of Urban Violence.” Criminology39:517-58.
43.
NajakaStacy S.GottfredsonDenise C.WilsonDavid B.2001. “A Meta-analytic Inquiry into the Relationship between Selected Risk Factors and Problem Behavior.” Prevention Science2:257-71.
44.
National Research Council. 2003. Deadly Lessons: Understanding Lethal School Violence. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
45.
OlweusDan. 1993. Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
46.
O’NeillLaurenMcGloinJean Marie. 2007. “Considering the Efficacy of Situational Crime Prevention in Schools.” Journal of Criminal Justice35:511-23.
47.
PayneAllison A.2008. “A Multilevel Analysis of the Relationships among Communal School Organization, Student Bonding, and Delinquency.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency45:429-55.
48.
PayneAllison A.GottfredsonDenise C.GottfredsonGary D.2003. “Schools as Communities: The Relationships among Communal School Organization, Student Bonding, and School Disorder.” Criminology41:749-78.
49.
PhaneufShannon Womer. 2006. “School Security Practices: Investigating Their Consequences on Student Fear, Bonding and School Climate.” PhD dissertation, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Maryland, College Park.
50.
PortesAlejandro. 1998. “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology24:1-24.
51.
RaudenbushSteve W.BrykAnthony S.2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
52.
ResnickMichael D.IrelandMarjorieBorowskyIris. 2004. “Youth Violence Perpetration: What Protects? What Predicts? Findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.” Journal of Adolescent Health35:424.e1-e10.
53.
RumbergerR. W.1995. “Dropping Out of Middle School: A Multilevel Analysis of Students and Schools.” American Educational Research Journal32:583-625.
54.
SampsonRobertLauritsenJanet. 1990. “Deviant Lifestyles, Proximity to Crime, and the Offender-Victim Link in Personal Violence.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency27:110-39.
55.
SampsonRobertMorenoffJeffrey D.EarlsFelton. 1999. “Beyond Spatial Capital: Spatial Dynamics of Collective Efficacy for Children.” American Sociological Review64:633-60.
56.
SampsonRobertRaudenbushStephen W.EarlsFelton. 1997. “Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy.” Science277:918-24.
57.
SchreckChristopherMillerJ. MitchellGibsonChris. 2003. “Trouble in the School Yard: A Study of the Risk Factors of Victimization at School.” Crime and Delinquency49:460-84.
58.
SnyderHoward N.SickmundMelissa. 1995. Juvenile Offenders and Victims: A Focus on Violence. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
59.
U.S. Secret Service National Threat Assessment Center. 2000. Safe School Initiative: An Interim Report on the Prevention of Targeted Violence in Schools. Washington DC: U.S. Secret Service.
60.
WelshWayne N.2000. “The Effects of School Climate on School Disorder.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science567:88-107.
61.
WelshWayne N.2001. “Effects of Student and School Factors on Five Measures of School Disorder.” Justice Quarterly18:911-47.
62.
WilcoxPamelaTillyerMarie SkubakFisherBonnie S.2009. “Gendered Opportunity? School-Based Adolescent Victimization.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency46:245-69.
63.
WittebroodKarinNieubeertaPaul. 2000. “Criminal Victimization During One’s Life Course: The Effects of Previous Victimization and Patterns of Routine Activities.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency37:91-112.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
