This article introduces cluster analysis and reference set analysis as tools for understanding structure, identity, and aspiration in complex organizational fields. Cluster analysis is used to identify the structure of the organizational field in American four-year colleges and universities. The article shows that presidential choices of reference institutions closely parallel the major locations in this structure. By contrast, several widely used classifications of higher education institutions fail to correspond either to the “objective” or to the “perceived” structure of the field. The article also identifies the major locations of presidential discontent within the field, measured as differences between presidents' current and aspiration reference sets. This analysis shows that only presidents in research universities and highly selective liberal arts colleges are content with their current locations. Finally, the article shows that aspirations for change are conditioned by location in the field and that presidents of the stronger institutions within each major category are more likely to indicate mobility aspirations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association of State Colleges and Universities and National Association of State University and Land-Grant Colleges. 2004. Student Charges and Financial Aid 2003–2004. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
AschSolomon E. 1956. Studies in Independence and Conformity. Psychology Monographs70(9). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3.
AstinAlexander W. 1993. What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BanfieldJeffrey D.RafteryAdrian E.. 1993. “Model-based Gaussian and non-Gaussian Clustering”. Biometrics49:803–21.
5.
BergerJosephZelditchMorris. 1984. Status, Rewards, and Influence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
BergerPeter L.LuckmannThomas. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
7.
BirnbaumRobert. 1989. “Presidential Succession and Institutional Functioning in Higher Education”. Journal of Higher Education60:123–35.
8.
BourdieuPierre. 1971. “Intellectual Field and Creative Project”. Pp. 161–88 in Knowledge and Control: New Directions for the Sociology of Education, edited by YoungM. F. D.. London: Collier-Macmillan.
9.
BrenemanDavid W. 1994. Liberal Arts Colleges— Thriving, Surviving, or Endangered?Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
10.
BrenemanDavid W.FinneyJoni E., 1997. “The Changing Landscape: Higher Education in the 1990s”. Pp. 30-59 in Public and Private Financing of Higher Education, edited by CallanPatrickandFinneyJoni E.. Washington, DC: Oryx Press and the American Council of Education.
11.
BrintSteven. 2005. “Creating the Future: ‘New Directions’ in American Research Universities”. Minerva43:23–50.
12.
BrintStevenKarabelJerome. 1989. The Diverted Dream: Community Colleges and the Promise of Educational Opportunity, 1900-1985. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
BrintStevenLevyCharles S.RiddleMarkTurk-BicakciLori. 2003. Institutional Data Archive on American Higher Education, 1970-2000. Riverside: Electronic Data Archive, University of California, Riverside.
14.
BurkePeter. 1991. “Identity Processes and Social Stress”. American Sociological Review56:836–49.
15.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. 1994. A Classification of Institutions of Higher Education (with a foreword by Ernest A. Boyer) . Princeton, NJ: Author.
16.
CarrollGlenn. 1983. “A Stochastic Model of Organizational Mortality: A Review and Reanalysis”. Social Science Research12:303–29.
17.
ClarkBurton R. 1987. The Academic Life: Small Worlds, Different Worlds. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and Princeton University Press.
18.
CohenMichael D.MarchJames G.. 1974. Leadership and Ambiguity: The American College Presidency. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19.
CollinsRandall. 2002. “Credential Inflation and the Future of Universities”. Pp. 23–46 in The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University, edited by BrintSteven. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20.
DiMaggioPaulPowellWalter W.. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields”. American Sociological Review48:147–60.
21.
DoughertyKevin J. 1994. The Contradictory College: The Conflicting Origins, Impacts and Futures of Community Colleges. Albany: State University of New York Press.
22.
DunhamEdgar Alden. 1969. Colleges of the Forgotten Americans: A Profile of State Colleges and Regional Universities. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
EpsteinCynthia Fuchs. 1988. Deceptive Distinctions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24.
FinkelsteinSydneyHambrickDonald C.. 1996. Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and their Effects on Organizations. Minneapolis, MN: West.
25.
FligsteinNeil. 1990. The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
FloridaRichard. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
27.
GarfinkelHarold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Basil Blackwell.
28.
GumportPatricia J. 2002. “Universities and Knowledge: Restructuring the City of Intellect”. Pp. 47-81 in The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University, edited by BrintSteven. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29.
HannanMichael T.FreemanJohn H.. 1977. “The Population Ecology of Organizations”. American Journal of Sociology82:929–64.
JeppersonRonald L. 1991. “Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism”. Pp. 143–63 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by PowellWalter W.DiMaggioPaul J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
KellerGeorge. 2004. Transforming a College: The Story of a Little-Known College's Strategic Climb to National Distinction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
33.
KerrClark. 2002. “Shock Wave II: An Introduction to the Twenty-first Century”. Pp. 1–19 in The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University, edited by BrintSteven. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
34.
KirpDavid L. 2003. Shakespeare, Einstein, and the Bottom Line: The Marketing of Higher Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
KraatzMatthewZajacEdward S.. 1996. “Exploring the Limits of the New Institutionalism: The Causes and Consequences of Illegitimate Organizational Change”. American Sociological Review61:812–36.
36.
LamontMichele. 2001. “Symbolic Boundaries”. Pp. 15341–47 in The International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, edited by SmelserNeil J.BaltesPaul B.. London: Pergamon Press.
37.
LaumannEdward O.GalaskiewiczJosephMarsdenPeter V.. 1978. “Community Structure as Inter-organizational Linkage”. Annual Review of Sociology4:455–84.
38.
LaumannEdward O.KnokeDavid. 1987. The Organizational State: Social Change in National Policy Domains. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
39.
LemannNicholas. 1999. The Big Test: The Secret History of the American Meritocracy. New York: Farrar, Strauss, & Giroux.
40.
ScottLong, J.. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
41.
MarsdenGeorge M. 1994. The Soul of the American University: From Protestant Establishment to Established Nonbelief. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
Master Plan Survey Team. 1960. A Master Plan for Higher Education in California, 1960–1975. Sacramento: California State Department of Education.
MertonRobert K. 1949. “Continuities in the Theory of Reference Groups and Social Structure”. Pp. 335-440 in MertonRobert K., Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
45.
MeyerJohn W.RowanBrian. 1978. “The Structure of Educational Organizations”. Pp. 78–109 in Studies on Environments and Organizations, edited by MeyerMarshall. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46.
National Center for Education Statistics. 2002. Digest of Education Statistics, 2002. Washington, DC: Author.
47.
OliverChristine. 1991. “Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes”. Academy of Management Review16:145–79.
48.
RichardsonRichard C.Jr.BracoKathy ReevesCallanPatrick M.FinneyJoni E.. 1998. Designing State Higher Education Systems for a New Century. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
49.
RiesmanDavid. 1956. Constraint and Variety in American Education. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
50.
RuchRichard S. 2001. Higher Ed, Inc.: The Rise of the For-Profit University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
51.
StoufferSamuel. 1949. The American Soldier. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
52.
SuchmanMark C. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches”. Academy of Management Review20:305–29.
53.
SwidlerAnnArditiJorge. 1994. “The New Sociology of Knowledge”. Annual Review of Sociology20:305–29.
54.
TolbertPamela S. 1985. “Resource Dependence and Institutional Environments: Sources of Administrative Structure in Institutions of Higher Education”. Administrative Science Quarterly30:1–13.
55.
UzziBrian D. 1996. “The Sources and Consequences of Embeddeedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect”.. American Sociological Review61: 74–98.
56.
ZemskyRobertShamanSusanIannoziMaria. 1997 (November-December). “The Landscape: In Search of Strategic Perspective—A Tool for Mapping the Market in Postsecondary Education”. Change: 23–36.
57.
ZucherLynne G. 1977. “The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence”. American Sociological Review42:726–43.
58.
ZweigenhaftRichard L.DomhoffG. William. 1998. Diversity in the Power Elite: Have Women and Minorities Reached the Top?New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
