How do unselective schools that serve disadvantaged students get employers to recognize their graduates' qualifications? This study examined whether low-status colleges (whose credentials may not be widely understood) rely on the traditional college charter or engage in charter-building activities to get employers to recognize students' value. Examining occupational programs in public and private two-year colleges, the authors found that both types of colleges do similar activities but do them differently. While these community colleges act as if additional action is not required, these private two-year occupational colleges actively engage in charter-building activities, mediating the hiring process by conveying students' qualifications through trusted relationships and aiming to place all their graduates, including many disadvantaged students, in jobs. The authors speculate that charter building identifies previously ignored issues and may suggest ways that low-status schools can make hiring into an institutional process in which students' lower social backgrounds have a less-negative influence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AplingRichard N.1993. “Proprietary Schools and Their Students.”Journal of Higher Education64:379–416.
2.
BaileyThomas. 2002. “Director's Column.” CCRC Currents. New York: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
3.
BaileyThomasBadwayNorenaGumport.Patricia2002“For-profit Higher Education and Community Colleges.” Technical Report No. x-xx. Stanford, CA: National Center for Postsecondary Improvement, Stanford University. Available on-line at http://www.stan-ford.edu/group/ncpi/documents/pdfs/forprofi-tandcc.pdf
4.
BeckerGary S.1975. Human Capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BillsDavid B.1992. “The Mutability of Educational Credentials as Hiring Criteria: How Employers Evaluate Atypically High Credentialed Job Candidates.”Work and Occupations19:79–95.
6.
BloomHoward S.OrrLarry LaurenceCaveGeorgeBellSam H.Doolittle.Fred1992. The National JTPA Study: Title II-A Impacts on Earnings and Employment at 18 Months. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates.
7.
BrewerDominic J.1999. How Do Community College Faculty View Institutional Mission? An Analysis of National Survey Data. New York: Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.
8.
BrewerDominic J.Gray.Maryann1997. Connecting College and Community in the New Economy?Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.
9.
BrewerDominic J.Gray.Maryann1999. “Do Faculty Connect School to Work? Evidence from Community Colleges.”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis21:405–16.
10.
BrintSteven. 2003. “Few Remaining Dreams: Community Colleges since 1985.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science586:16–37.
11.
BrintStevenKarabel.Jerome1989. The Diverted Dream: Community College and the Promise of Educational Opportunity in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
BrintStevenKarabel.Jerome1991. “Institutional Origins and Transformations: The Case of American Community Colleges.” Pp. 337–60 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by PowellWalter W.DiMaggioPaul J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
BrintonMary. 1993. Women and the Economic Miracle. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
BrownDavid K.2001. “The Social Sources of Educational Credentialism: Status Cultures, Labor Markets, and Organizations.”Sociology of Education. Extra Issue:19–34.
15.
CaveGeorgeDoolittle.Fred1991. Assessing Jobstart: Interim Impacts of a Program for School Dropouts. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
16.
ColemanJames. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.”American Journal of Sociology94: S95–S120.
17.
CrossPatricia K.Fideler.Elizabeth F.1989. “Community College Missions: Priorities in the Mid-1980's. Journal of Higher Education60:209–16.
18.
Deil-AmenRegina J.2003. “To Teach or Not to Teach ‘Social’ Skills? Comparing Community Colleges and Private Occupational Colleges.” Unpublished manuscript, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.
19.
Deil-AmenRegina J.RosenbaumJames E.2003. “The Social Prerequisites of Success: Can College Structure Reduce the Need for Social Know-How?”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science586:120–43.
20.
DoughertyKevin J.1994. The Contradictory College. Albany: State University of New York Press.
21.
DoughertyKevin J.Bakia.Marianne2000. “The New Economic Development Role of the Community College.” CCRC Research Brief No. 6. New York: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
22.
GranovetterMark. 1995. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
GrubbW. Norton. 1996. Working in the Middle. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
HamiltonStephen F.1990. Apprenticeship for Adulthood: Preparing Youth for the Future. New York: Free Press.
25.
Illinois Board of Higher Education.2002. 2001 Databook. Springfield, IL: Author.
26.
JacobsJerry A.Winslow.Sarah2003. “Welfare Reform and Enrollment in Postsecondary Education.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science586:194–217.
27.
KariyaTakehikoRosenbaum.James E.1995. “Institutional Linkages Between Education and Work as Quasi-internal Labor Markets.”Research in Social Stratification and Mobility14:99–134.
28.
LinNanEnselWalterVaughn.John1981. “Social Resources and Strength of Ties.”American Sociological Review46:393–405.
29.
MazzeoChristopherRabSaraEachusSusan2003“Work First or Work Only.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science586:144–71.
30.
MeyerJohn. 1977. “The Effects of Education as an Institution.”American Journal of Sociology83:55–77.
31.
MeyerJohn W.Rowan.Brian1991. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” Pp. 41–62 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by PowellWalter W.DiMaggioPaul J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
MillerShaziaRosenbaum.James1997. “Hiring in a Hobbesian World: Social Infrastructure and Employers' Use of Information.”Work and Occupations24:498–523.
33.
MossPhilipTilly.Chris2000. Stories Employers Tell: Race, Skill and Hiring in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
34.
MurnaneRichard J.Levy.Frank1996. Teaching the New Basic Skills: Principles for Educating Children to Thrive in a Changing Economy. New York: Free Press.
35.
NeckermanKathryn M.Kirschenman.Joleen1991. “Hiring Strategies, Racial Bias, and Inner-city Workers.”Social Problems38:801–15.
36.
OstermanPaul. 1988. Employment Futures. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
PersellCaroline H.CooksonPeter W.Jr.1985. “Chartering and Bartering: Elite Education and Social Reproduction.”Social Problems33:114–29.
38.
PersonAnn E.RosenbaumJames E.Deil-Amen.Regina Forthcoming. “Student Information Problems in Different College Structures.”Teachers College Record.
39.
PetersonTrondSpaortaIshakSeidelMarc-David L.2000. “Offering A Job.”American Journal of Sociology106:763–816.
40.
RosenbaumJames. 1992. Youth Apprenticeship in America. New York: W. T. Grant Foundation.
41.
RosenbaumJames. 2001. Beyond College for All: Career Paths for the Forgotten Half. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
42.
ShawKathleen M.Rab.Sara2003. “Market Rhetoric versus Reality in Policy and Practice: The Workforce Investment Act and Access to Community College Education and Training.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science586:172–93.
43.
StiglerGeorge. 1961. “The Economics of Information.”Journal of Political Economy69:213–25.
44.
U.S. Department of Education.2001. Digest of Education Statistics, 2000. Washington, DC: Author.
45.
WegenerBernd. 1991. “Job Mobility and Social Ties.”American Sociological Review56:60–71.
46.
WilmsWellford W.1974. Public and Proprietary Vocational Training: A Study of Effectiveness. Berkeley: Center for Research and Development in Higher Education, University of California.
