Using survey data collected in fall 2000, the authors analyzed four aspects of “horizontal” variation among Russian university students: field of specialization, cost (paid versus free), intensity (full- versus part-time study), and timing of study (Soviet versus post-Soviet era). For each type of variation, they examined trends over time, gender differences, and effects on earnings and employment opportunities. In Russia, as elsewhere, horizontal differentiation of higher education has stratifying consequences. Unlike in many countries, gender differences along horizontal dimensions have not narrowed in Russia; in fact, the gender gap in part-time study has widened. But the introduction of market forces in higher education and the economy has shaped both male and female distributions across specialty, cost, and intensity. The labor market advantages accruing to a university degree differ across these horizontal dimensions and by the timing of the degree. Some of the patterns observed in Russia resemble those in the United States, while others are distinctive.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AyalonHanna. 2003. “Women and Men Go to University: Gender Differences in Choice of Field in Higher Education.”Sex Roles48:277–90.
2.
BalzerHarley D.1994. “Plans to Reform Russian Higher Education.” Pp. 27–46 in Education and Society in the New Russia, edited by JonesAnthony. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.
3.
BergerMark C.1988. “Predicted Future Earnings and Choice of College Major.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review41:418–29.
4.
BlossfeldHans-PeterShavitYossi. 1993. “Persisting Barriers: Changes in Educational Opportunity in Thirteen Countries.” Pp. 1–23 in Persistent Inequality: Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries, edited by ShavitYossiBlossfeldHans-Peter. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
5.
BradleyKaren. 2000. “The Incorporation of Women into Higher Education: Paradoxical Outcomes?”Sociology of Education73:1–18.
6.
BrayMarkBorevskayaNina. 2001. “Financing Education in Transitional Societies: Lessons from Russia and China.”Comparative Education37:345–65.
7.
BrownCharlesCorcoranMary. 1997. “Sex-Based Differences in School Content and the Male-Female Wage Gap.”Journal of Labor Economics15:431–65.
8.
CharlesMariaBradleyKaren. 2002. “Equal but Separate? A Cross-National Study of Sex Segregation in Higher Education.”American Sociological Review67:573–99.
9.
ChurchwardLawrence G.1973. The Soviet Intelligentsia. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
10.
DaviesScottGuppyNeil. 1997. “Fields of Study, College Selectivity, and Student Inequalities in Higher Education.”Social Forces75:1417–38.
11.
EriksonRobertGoldthorpeJohn H.. 1992. The Constant Flux. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
12.
FiorentineRobert. 1987. “Men, Women, and the Premed Persistence Gap: A Normative Alternatives Approach.”American Journal of Sociology92:1118–39.
13.
FlakierskiHenryk. 1993. Income Inequalities in the Former Soviet Union and Its Republics. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
14.
FullerRexSchoenbergerRichard. 1991. “The Gender Salary Gap: Do Academic Achievement, Internship Experience, and College Major Make a Difference?”Social Science Quarterly72:715–26.
15.
GerberTheodore P.2000a. “Educational Stratification in Contemporary Russia: Stability and Change in the Face of Economic and Institutional Crisis.”Sociology of Education73:219–46.
16.
GerberTheodore P.2000b. “Membership Benefits or Selection Effects? Why Former Communist Party Members Do Better in Post-Soviet Russia.”Social Science Research29:25–50.
17.
GerberTheodore P.2001. “The Selection Theory of Persisting Party Advantages in Russia: More Evidence and Implications.”Social Science Research30:653–71.
18.
GerberTheodore P.2002. “Structural Change and Post-Socialist Stratification: Labor Market Transitions in Contemporary Russia.”American Sociological Review67:629–59.
19.
GerberTheodore P.2003a. “Loosening Links? School-to-Work Transitions and Institutional Change in Russia Since 1970.”Social Forces82:241–76.
20.
GerberTheodore P.2003b. “Post-Secondary Education in Russia Since the Second World War: Expansion, Institutional Change, and Inequality.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
21.
GerberTheodore P.BallDeborah Y.. 2002. “The State of Russian Science: Focus Groups with Nuclear Physicists.”Post-Soviet Affairs18:183–212.
22.
GerberTheodore P.HoutMichael. 1995. “Educational Stratification in Russia During the Soviet Period.”American Journal of Sociology101:611–60.
23.
GerberTheodore P.HoutMichael. 1998. “More Shock Than Therapy: Employment and Income in Russia, 1991-1995.”American Journal of Sociology104:1–50.
24.
GerhartBarry. 1990. “Gender Differences in Current and Starting Salaries: The Role of Performance, College Major, and Job Title.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review43:418–33.
25.
GillAndrew M.LeighDuane E.. 2000. “Community College Enrollment, College Major, and the Gender Wage Gap.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review54:163–81.
26.
RossiGoskomstat[Gosudarstvennyi Komitet Rossiiskoi Federatsii Po Statistike—the State Statistical Committee of the Russian Federation]. 1995. Obrazovanie Naseleniia Rossii: Po Dannym Mikroperepsis Naseleniia 1994 g [The Education of the Russian Population: According to Data from the 1994 Microcensus]. Moscow: Author.
27.
GrubbW. Norton. 1993. “The Varied Economic Returns to Postsecondary Education: New Evidence from the Class of 1972.”Journal of Human Resources28:365–82.
28.
HalabyCharles N.2003. “Where Job Values Come From: Family and Schooling Background, Cognitive Ability, and Gender.”American Sociological Review68:251–78.
29.
HoutMichael. 1988. “Expanding Universalism, Less Structural Mobility: The American Occupational Structure in the 1980s.”American Journal of Sociology93:1358–1400.
30.
IshidaHiroshiSpilermanSeymourSuKuo-Hsien. 1997. “Educational Credentials and Promotion Chances in Japanese and American Organizations.”American Sociological Review62:866–82.
31.
JacobsJerry A.1989. Revolving Doors: Sex Segregation and Women's Careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
32.
JacobsJerry A.1995. “Gender and Academic Specialties: Trends among Recipients of College Degrees in the 1980s.”Sociology of Education68:81–98.
33.
JonssonJan O.1999. “Explaining Sex Differences in Educational Choice: An Empirical Assessment of a Rational Choice Model.”European Sociological Review15:391–404.
34.
JoyLois. 2003. “Salaries of Recent Male and Female College Graduates: Educational and Labor Market Effects.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review56:600–21.
35.
KalmijnMatthijsLippeTanja van der. 1997. “Type of Schooling and Sex Differences in Earnings in the Netherlands.”European Sociological Review13:1–15.
36.
KerckhoffAlan C.BellLorraine. 1998. “Hidden Capital: Vocational Credentials and Attainment in the United States.”Sociology of Education71:152–74.
37.
KerrStephen T.1992. “Debate and Controversy in Soviet Higher Education Reform: Reinventing a System.” Pp. 146–63 in Soviet Education Under Perestroika, edited by DunstanJohn. London: Routledge.
38.
KimAnnaKimKi-Wan. 2003. “Returns to Tertiary Education in Germany and the UK: Effects of Fields of Study and Gender.” MZES Working Paper 62. Mannheimer, Germany: Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung.
39.
KryshtanovskaiaOlga V.1989. Inzhenery: Stanovlenie i Razvitie Professional'noi Gruppy [Engineers: The Formation and Development of a Professional Group]. Moscow: Nauka.
40.
LedenevaAlena V.1998. Russia's Economy of Favours: Blat, Networking, and Informal Exchange. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
41.
LouryLinda D.1997. “The Gender Earnings Gap among College-Educated Workers.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review50:580–93.
42.
LugachyovMikhailMarkovAndreiTipenkoNikolaiBelyakovSergei. 1997. “Structure and Financing of Higher Education in Russia.” Pp. 144–76 in Structure and Financing of Higher Education in Russia, Ukraine, and the EU, edited by HarePaul G.. London: Jessica Kingsley.
43.
MariniMargaret M.1984. “Women's Educational Attainment and the Timing of Entry into Parenthood.”American Sociological Review49:491–511.
44.
MariniMargaret M.FanPi-LingFinleyEricaBeutelAnn M.. 1996. “Gender and Job Values.”Sociology of Education69:49–65.
45.
MatthewsMervyn. 1982. Education in the Soviet Union. London: George Allen & Unwin.
46.
Monk-TurnerElizabeth. 1990. “The Occupational Achievements of Community and Four-Year College Entrants.”American Sociological Review55:719–25.
47.
MonksJames. 2000. “The Returns to Individual and College Characteristics: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth.”Economics of Education Review19:279–89.
48.
MuellerWalterShavitYossi. 1998. “The Institutional Embeddedness of the Stratification Process: A Comparative Study of Qualifications and Occupations in Thirteen Countries.” Pp.1–48 in From School to Work: A Comparative Study of Educational Qualifications and Occupational Destinations, edited by ShavitYossiMuellerWalter. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
49.
National Center for Education Statistics. 1991. Occupational and Educational Outcomes of Recent College Graduates One Year after Graduation. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
50.
National Center for Education Statistics. 2002. Profile of Undergraduates in U.S. Postsecondary Institutions: 1999-2000. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
51.
National Science Board. 2000. Science and Engineering Indicators 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
52.
O'NeillJunePolachekSolomon. 1993. “Why the Gender Gap in Wages Narrowed in the 1980s.”Journal of Labor Economics11:205–28.
53.
PaglinMortonRufoloAnthony. 1990. “Heterogeneous Human Capital, Occupational Choice, and Male-Female Earnings Differences.”Journal of Labor Economics8:123–44.
54.
PoletayevAndreiSavelievaIrina. 2001. “Trends in Professional Education in Russia. Part 1: Objects of Supply and Demand.”Russian Economic Trends10:45–59.
55.
RamirezFrancisco O.WotipkaChristine M.. 2001. “Slowly but Surely? The Global Expansion of Women's Participation in Science and Engineering Fields of Study, 1972-92.”Sociology of Education74:231–51.
56.
SmythEmer. 2002. “Gender Differentiation and Early Labour Market Integration Across Europe.” MZES Working Paper 46. Mannheimer, Germany: Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung.
57.
SperlingValerie. 1999. Organizing Women in Contemporary Russia: Engendering Transition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
58.
StolzenbergRoss M.RellesDaniel A.. 1997. “Tools for Intuition About Sample Selection Bias and Its Correction,”American Sociological Review62:494–507.
59.
TsISN [“Tsentr Issledovanii i Statistiki Nauki,” Center for Science Research and Statistics]. 1999. Vyshee Obrazovanie v Rossii 1999 [Higher Education in Russia, 1999]. Moscow, Author.
60.
TurnerSarah E.BowenWilliam G.. 1999. “Choice of Major: The Changing (Unchanging) Gender Gap.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review52:289–313.
61.
WellingtonAlison J.1993. “Changes in the Male/Female Wage Gap: 1976-85.”Journal of Human Resources28:383–411.
62.
WilsonKenneth L.BoldizarJanet P.. 1990. “Gender Segregation in Higher Education: Effects of Aspirations, Mathematics Achievement, and Income.”Sociology of Education63:62–74.
63.
WinshipChristopherMareRobert D.1992. “Models for Sample Selection Bias.”Annual Review of Sociology327–50.
64.
XieYu. 1992. “The Log-Multiplicative Layer Effect Model for Comparing Mobility Tables.”American Sociological Review57:380–95.
65.
ZaslavskyViktor. 1982. The Neo-Stalinist State. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
