Cultural trends shape the experience of marriage by forming expectations, entitlements and obligations. The self-development discourse generated by the therapeutic culture has been suggested as playing a part in such shaping. This paper examines how this particular discourse affects the way women experience their marital conversations and, more specifically, the extent to which they feel able to initiate change-directed negotiation within them. Twenty-eight professional women in England, selected to reflect different occupational exposures to the self-development discourse, were interviewed in order to examine their experiences of the marital conversation and possible changes within it. The analysis shows that specific feeling rules limit the possibility of women's concerns entering the marital conversation, and that the self-development discourse can introduce alternative feeling rules with the potential to overcome such limitations. It is shown that women who are influenced by the ideological messages equating change with relationship improvement contained within this discourse are able to adopt its proposed feeling rules and to use them to introduce negotiation into their marital conversations. These women are able to use this increased negotiability within the marital conversation to become more powerful in shaping their marital experiences.
Askham, J. 1985. Identity and Stability in Marriage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Backett, K. C. 1982. Mothers and Fathers: A Study of the Development and Negotiation of Parental Behaviour. London: Macmillan.
3.
Bartky, S. 1990. `Feeding Egos and Tending Wounds: Deference and Disaffection in Women's Emotional Labor', Ch. 7 in her Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. New York: Routledge.
4.
Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. 1995. The Normal Chaos of Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.
5.
Benjamin, O. and Sullivan O.1996. `The Importance of Difference: Conceptualising Increased Flexibility in Gender Relations at Home'. Sociological Review44: 225-251.
6.
Benjamin, O. and Sullivan, O. Forthcoming. `Relational Resources, Gender Consciousness and Possibilities of Change in Marital Relationships'. Sociological Review.
7.
Berger, P. L. and Kellner, H.1964. `Marriage and the Construction of Reality'. Diogenes, 46:24.
8.
Boss, P. and Thorne, B. 1989. `Family Sociology and Family Therapy: A Feminist Linkage', in M. McGoldrick, C. M. Anderson and F. Walsh (eds.), Women in Families: A Framework for Family Therapy. New York: Norton and Company.
9.
Cancian, F. M. 1987. Love in America: Gender and Self-Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Cancian, F. M. and Gordon, S. L.1988. `Changing Emotion Norms in Marriage: Love and Anger in Women's US Magazines since 1900'. Gender and Society2:308-342.
11.
Cancian, F. M. 1989. ` “Gender Politics”: Love, and Power in the Private and Public Spheres', pp. 219-230, in A. Skolnick and R. Skolnick (eds.), Family in Transition, 6th edn, California: Scott and Foresman Co.
12.
Coltrane, S.1989. `Household Labour and the Routine Production of Gender'. Social Problems36:473-490.
13.
Connell, R.1990. `The State, Gender and Sexual Politics'. Theory and Society19:507-540.
14.
Crawford, M. 1993. Talking Difference: On Gender and Language. California: Sage Publications Ltd.
15.
Daniels-Kaplan, A.1987. `Invisible Work'. Social Problems34:403-415.
16.
De Vault, L. M.1989. `Conflict over Housework: A Problem that (Still) Has No Name'. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change12:189-202.
17.
De Vault, L. M. 1991. Feeding the Family: The Social Organization of Caring as Gendered Work. Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Eichler, M.1981. `Power, Dependency, Love and the Sexual Division of Labour'. Women's Studies International Forum4:201-219.
19.
Ferree, M. M. 1988. `Negotiating Household Roles and Responsibilities: Resistance, Conflict and Change'. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Family Relations, Philadelphia.
20.
Ferree, M. M.1990. `Beyond Separate Spheres: Feminism and Family Research'. Journal of Marriage and the Family52:886-894.
21.
Finch, J. 1983. Married to the Job. London: Allen & Unwin.
22.
Finch, J. 1989. Family Obligations and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
23.
Gerson, J. and Peiss, K.1985. `Boundaries, Negotiation, Consciousness: Reconceptualising Gender Relation'. Social Problems. 32:317-331.
24.
Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
25.
Giddens, A. 1992. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
26.
Haavind, H. 1984. `Love and Power in Marriage', in H. Holter (ed.) Patriarchy in a Welfare Society. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
27.
Hochschild, A. R. 1983. The Managed Heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
Hochschild, A. R. 1989. The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
Komter, A.1989. `Hidden Power in Marriage'. Gender and Society3:187-216.
30.
LaRossa, R. and LaRossa, M. 1984. The Transition to Parenthood. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publication Inc.
31.
Lewis, J., Clark, D. and Morgan, D. 1992. Whom God Hath Joined Together: The Work of Marriage Guidance. London: Routledge.
32.
Lukes, S. 1978. Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan.
33.
mansfield, P. and Collard, J. 1988. The Beginning of the Rest of Your Life? A Portrait of Newly-Wed Marriage. London: Macmillan.
34.
Martin, B.1984. `Mother Wouldn't Like It! Housework as Magic'. Theory, Culture and Society, 2:19-36.
35.
Oakley, A. 1981. `Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms', in H. Roberts (ed.), Doing Feminist Research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
36.
Pascall, G. 1989. Social Policy: A Feminist Analysis. London: Tavistock.
37.
Pyke, K. and Coltrane, S.1996. `Entitlement, Obligation, and Gratitude in Family Work'. Journal of Family Issues17:60-82.
38.
Retzinger, S. M. 1991. Violent Emotions. California: Sage Publication Inc.
39.
Simonds, W. 1992. Women and Self-Help Culture: Reading Between the Lines. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
40.
Stanley, L. 1990. `Feminist Praxis and the Academic Mode of Production' in her edited Feminist Praxis. London: Routledge.
41.
Strauss, A. 1978. Negotiation. San Francisco; Jossey Bass.
42.
Sullivan, O.1997. `The Division of Household Labour among “Remarried” Couples'. Journal of Family Issues. March.
43.
Thompson, L.1993. `Conceptualising Gender in Marriage: The Case of Marital Care'. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 55:557-569.
44.
Vaughan, D. 1986. Uncoupling: Turning Points in Intimate Relationships. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
Walkerdine, V. 1985. `On the Regulation of Speaking and Silence: Subjectivity, Class and Gender in Contemporary Schooling', in C. Steedman, C. Urwin and V. Walkerdine. (eds.), Language, Gender and Childhood. London: Macmillan.
46.
Walkerdine, V. and Lucy, H. 1989. Democracy in the Kitchen: Regulating Mothers and Socialising Daughters. London: Virago Press.
47.
Zisowitz-Stearns, C. and Stearns, P. N. 1986. Anger: The Struggle for Emotional Control in America's History. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
