This study considers the social organisation of the economic elite in Germany and Britain. Specifically, the analysis focuses on the internal structure of this social group, which is termed an `elite network'. The resources on which the dominance of the economic elite is based are bureaucratic power, ownership and social capital. In institutional capitalism the power of managers is based not only on their hierarchical position within large corporations, but also on the fact that they `represent' ownership within the network of associated firms. Additional topics considered in the course of the analysis include the forms of social control to which the economic elite is subject, the degree of internal competition and co-operation, and the stability of networks over time (circulation of the elite). The analysis shows how bureaucratic control over a company is linked with ownership of a company in the context of specific network configurations. These network configurations vary between countries and lead to differing forms of managerial control within institutional capitalism.
Alba, R. and Moore, G.1978. `Elite Social Circles'. Sociological Methods & Research7:167-187.
2.
Bearden, J. and Mintz, B. 1987. `The Structure of Class Cohesion: The Corporate Network and its Dual', pp. 187-207 of M. Mizruchi, and M. Schwarz (eds.), Intercorporate Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Berle, A. and Means, G. 1934. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.
4.
Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
5.
Brudney, V.1981. `The Independent Director: Heavenly City of Potemkin Village?'Harvard Law Review95:597-659.
6.
Chandler, A. 1990. Scale and Scope. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
7.
Davis, G.1991. `Agents without Principles?'Administrative Science Quarterly36:583-613.
8.
Doreian, P. and Woodard, K.1994. `Defining and Locating Cores and Boundaries of Social Networks'. Social Networks16:267-293.
9.
Fligstein, N. 1990. The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
10.
Fligstein, N.1995. `Networks of Power or the Finance Conception of Control? Comment on Palmer, Barber, Zhou, and Soysal'. American Sociological Review60:500-503.
11.
Frank, O.1981. `A Survey of Statistical Methods for Graph Analysis'. Sociological Methodology11:110-155.
12.
Gerlach, M. 1992. Alliance Capitalism: The Social Organisation of Japanese Business. Berkeley: University of California Press.
13.
Granovetter, M.1985. `Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness'. American Journal of Sociology91:481-510.
14.
Herman, E. 1981. Corporate Control, Corporate Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Hill, S.1995. `The Social Organisation of Boards of Directors'. British Journal of Sociology46:245-278.
16.
Higley, J.et al.1991. `Elite Integration in Stable Democracies'. European Sociological Review7:35-53.
17.
Hommelhoff, P. 1985. `Eigenkontrolle statt Staatskontrolle', pp. 53-105 of W. Schubert, and P. Hommelhoff (eds.), Hundert Jahre modernes Aktienrecht. Berlin: de Gruyter.
18.
Kadushin, C.1966. `The Friends and Supporters of Psychotherapy: On Social Circles in Urban Life'. American Sociological Review31:786-802.
19.
Koenig, T.et al.1979. `Models of the Significance of Interlocking Corporate Directorates'. American Journal of Economics and Sociology38:174-186.
20.
Lorsch, J. and MacIver, E. 1989. Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America's Corporate Boards. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
21.
Nörr, K.1995. `Law and Market Organisation: The Historical Experience in Germany From 1900 to the Law Against Restraints of Competition'. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics151:5-20.
22.
Pareto, V. 1968. The Rise and Fall of the Elites. Totowa, N.J.: Bedminster Press.
23.
Parsons, T. 1978. Action Theory and the Human Condition. New York: Free Press.
24.
Pound, J. 1992. `The Rise of the Political Model of Corporate Governance and Corporate Control'. Working Paper, Harvard University.
25.
Roe, M. 1994. Strong Managers, Weak Owners. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
Scott, J.1990. `Corporate Control and Corporate Rule'. British Journal of Sociology41:351-373.
27.
Scott, J. 1996. Stratification and Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28.
Scott, J. 1997. Corporate Business and Capitalist Classes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
Shleifer, A. and Summers, L. 1988. `Breach of Trust in Hostile Takeovers', pp. 33-67 of A. Auerbach (ed.), Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Simmel, G. 1908. `Die Kreuzung sozialer Kreise', pp. 305-344 of G. Simmel, Soziologie. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
31.
Stark, D.1996. `Recombinant Property in East European Capitalism'. American Journal of Sociology101:993-1027.
Stokman, F. N.et al. (eds.) 1985. Networks of Corporate Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
34.
Szelenyi, I. and Szelenyi, S.1995. `Circulation or Reproduction of Elites During the Postcommunist Transformation of Eastern Europe?'Theory and Society24:615-638.
35.
Useem, M. 1984. The Inner Circle. London: Oxford University Press.
36.
Useem, M. 1996. Investor Capitalism. New York: Basic Books.
37.
Wegener, B.1987. `Vom Nutzen entfernter Bekannter'. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie39:278-301.
38.
Williamson, O. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.
39.
Windolf, P.1994. `Die neuen Eigentümer: Eine Analyse des Marktes für Unternehmenskontrolle'. Zeitschrift für Soziologie23:79-92.
40.
Windolf, P. and Beyer, J.1996. `Co-operative Capitalism: Corporate Networks in Germany and Britain'. British Journal of Sociology47:205-231.
41.
Windolf, P. and Wood, S. 1988. Recruitment and Selection in the Labour Market. Aldershot: Avebury.
