Contemporary class analysis takes the national state as its unit of analysis. This convention could be challenged on at least two grounds. On the one hand, the national state might be seen as too gross an aggregation that leads to the neglect of important internal variation; on the other, the national state might be considered an irrelevant distinction for the study of processes that are best viewed on a larger canvas. In this paper we concern ourselves with this latter possibility and we assess the extent to which globalisation threatens to displace the national state's role in shaping class structure and patterns of social fluidity. In our formulation, the competing claims of national state and global system effects on class structures and mobility regimes involve matters of degree, and thus are open to empirical investigation. The existing evidence supports the continued resilience of the national state but not so emphatically as to preclude the need to take account of world-system influences. This leads us to propose an analytical strategy for integrating world-system effects into class analysis. We conclude by suggesting that a more robust challenge to the role of the national state in class analysis might yet come from the growth of the `new regionalism' in Europe and elsewhere.
Abbott, A. and DeViney, S.1992. `The Welfare State as Transnational Event: Evidence from Sequences of Policy Adoption'. Social Science History16(2):245-274.
2.
Agnew, J. A. 1987. Place and Politics: The Geographical Mediation of State and Society. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
3.
Baxter, J.1994. `Is Husband's Class Enough? Class Location and Class Identity in the United States, Sweden, Norway, and Australia'. American Sociological Review59(2):220-235.
4.
Blau, P. M. and Dudley Duncan, O. 1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York: Wiley.
5.
Breen, R. and Rottman, D. B.1995. `Class Analysis and Class Theory'. Sociology29:453-473.
6.
Calhoun, C. 1995. Critical Social Theory: Culture, History, and the Challenge of Difference. Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell.
7.
Carnoy, M. 1993. `Multinationals in a Changing World Economy: Whither the Nation-State?' in M. Carnoy, M. Castells, S. Cohen and F. Henrique Cardoso (eds.), The New Global Economy in the Information Age: Reflections on Our Changing World. University Park, Penn.: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
8.
Carnoy, M., Castells, M., Cohen, S. S. and Henrique Cardoso, F. 1993. `Introduction' and `Epilogue', in M. Carnoy, M. Castells, S. Cohen and F. Henrique Cardoso (eds.) The New Global Economy in the Information Age: Reflections on Our Changing World. University Park, Penn.: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
9.
Castles, F. 1988. The State and Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
Chase-Dunn, C. 1989. Global Formation: Structures of the World-Economy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
11.
[first published in Business History Review, 58 (1984): 473-503.
12.
Clement, W. and Myles, J. 1994. Relations of Ruling: Class and Gender in Postindustrial Societies. Montreal: McGill-Queens' University Press.
13.
Connor, W.1990. `When is a Nation', Ethnic and Racial Studies13:92-100.
14.
Erikson, R. and Goldthorpe, J. H. 1992. The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
15.
Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1993a. `Post-Industrial Class Structures: An Analytical Framework', in G. Esping-Andersen (ed.), Changing Classes: Stratification and Mobility in Post-Industrial Societies. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
17.
Espin-Andersen, Gosta. 1993b. `Mobility Regimes and Class Formation', in Espin-Andersen (ed.), Changing Classes.
18.
Evans, P. and Stephens, T. D. 1988. `Development and the World Economy', in N. Smelser (ed.), Handbook of Sociology. London: Sage.
19.
Firebaugh, G. and Beck, F. D.1994. `Does Economic Growth Benefit the Masses?'American Sociological Review59:631-653.
20.
Gereffi, G. 1994. `The International Economy and Economic Development', in N. Smelser and R. Swedberg (eds.), The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
Gereffi, G. and Korzeniewicz, M. 1994. Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism, Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
22.
Giddens, A.. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
23.
Giddens, A. 1985. The Nation-State and Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
24.
Giddens, A. 1994. Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
25.
Goldthorpe, J. H. 1980/87. Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain, 2nd edn.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
26.
Goldthorpe, J. H.1983. `Women and Class Analysis: In Defence of the Conventional View', Sociology17:465-488.
27.
Goldthorpe, J. H. 1992. `Employment, Class, and Mobility: A Critique of Liberal and Marxist Theories of Long-term Change,' in H. Haferkamp and Neil J. Smelser (eds.) Social Change and Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
Goldthorpe, J. H. and Marshall, G.1992. `The Promising Future of Class Analysis: A Response to Recent Critiques'. Sociology26:381-400.
29.
Gordon, D. M. 1994. `The Global Economy: New Edifice or Crumbling Foundations?' in D. Kotz, T. McDonough. and M. Reich (eds.), Social Structures of Accumulation: The Political Economy of Growth and Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Grusky, D. B. and Hauser, R. M.1984. Comparative Social Mobility Revisted: Models of Convergence and Divergence in 16 Countries', American Sociological Review49:19-38.
31.
Haller, M., Kolosi, T. and Robert, P. 1990. `Social Mobility in Austria, Czechoslovakia, and Hungary. An Investigation of Industrialization, Socialist Revolution, and National Uniqueness', in M. Haller (ed.), Class Structure in Europe: New Findings from East-West Comparisons of Social Structure and Mobility. London: M. E. Sharpe.
32.
Hazelrigg, L. E. and Garnier, M. A.1976. `Occupational Mobility in Industrial Societies: A Comparative Analysis of Differential Access to Occupational Ranks in Seventeen Countries', American Sociological Review41:498-511.
33.
Heath, A. and Britten, N.1984. `Women's Jobs Do Make A Difference: A Reply to Goldthorpe', Sociology18:475-489.
34.
Hollingsworth, J. R. and Streeck, W. 1994. `Countries and Sectors: Concluding Remarks on Performance, Convergence, and Competitiveness', in Hollingsworth, Schmitter and Streeck (eds.), Governing Capitalist Economies.
35.
Hollingsworth, J. R., Schmitter, R. and Streeck, W. (eds.) 1994. Governing Capitalist Economies: Performance and Control of Economic Sectors. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
Kangas, O. 1994. `The Politics of Social Security: On Regressions, Qualitative Comparisons, and Cluster Analysis', in T. Janoski and A. Hicks (eds.), The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Keating, M. 1995. `Europeanism and Regionalism', in B. Jones and M. Keating (eds.), The European Union and the Regions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
38.
Kerr, C., Dunlop, J. T., Harbison, F. and Myers, C. A. 1960. Industrialism and Industrial Man: The Problems of Labour and the Management of Economic Growth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
39.
Korzeniewicz, R. and Martin, W. 1994. `The Global Distribution of Commodity Chains', in G. Gereffi and R. Korzeniewicz (eds.), Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
40.
Kotz, D. M. 1994. `The Regulation Theory and the Social Structure of Accumulation Approach', in D. Kotz, T. McDonough and M. Reich (eds.) Social Structures of Accumulation: The Political Economy of Growth and Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Mann, M.1993. `Nation-States in Europe and Other Continents: Diversifying, Developing, Not Dying', Daedalus122 (3):115-140.
42.
Marx, K. and Engels, F. 1848/1977. The Communist Manifesto, in D. McLellan (ed.), Karl Marx: Selected Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43.
Milward, A. 1993. `Conclusions: The Value of History', in A. Milward, F. Lynch, R. Ranieri, F. Romero and V. Sørensen, The Frontier of National Sovereignty: History and Theory 1945-1992. London: Routledge.
44.
Mouzelis, N. P. 1986. Politics in the Semi-Periphery. London: Macmillan.
45.
Myles, J. 1988. `Postwar Capitalism and the Extension of Social Security into a Retirement Wage', in M. Weir, A. Orloff and T. Skocpol (eds.), The Politics of Social Security in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
46.
Myles, J. and Turegun, A.`Comparative Studies in Class Structure', Annual Review of Sociology20:103-124.
47.
Prechel, H.1994. `Economic Crisis and the Centralization of Control over the Managerial Process: Corporate Restructuring and Neo-Fordist Decision-Making'. American Sociological Review59:723-745.
48.
Raftery, A. E. 1996. `Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research', in Peter V. Marsden (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1995, Volume 25, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
49.
Ragin, C. 1994. `A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Pension Systems', in T. Janoski and A. Hicks (eds.), The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Robertson, R. 1992. `Globality, Global Culture and the Images of World Order', in H. Haferkamp and N. Smelser (eds.), Social Change and Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
51.
Rose, R. 1985. `The Significance of Public Employment', in R. Rose (ed.) Public Employment in Western Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Sklair, L. 1991. Sociology of the Global System. Hemel-Hempstead: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
53.
Sklair, L.1995. `Social Movements and Global Capitalism'. Sociology29:495-512.
54.
Skocpol, T.1977. `Wallerstein's World Capitalist System: A Theoretical and Historical Critique'. American Journal of Sociology82:1075-1090.
55.
Smith, A. D. 1995. Nations and Nationalism in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.
56.
Snyder, D. and Kick, E.1979. `Structural Position in the World System and Economic Growth 1955-70: A Multiple Network Analysis in Transnational Interactions'. American Journal of Sociology84:1096-1126.
57.
Stanworth, M.1984. `Women and Class Analysis: A Reply to John Goldthorpe'. Sociology18:159-170.
58.
Tilly, C. 1992. Coercion, Capital and European States, AD 990-1992. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
59.
Usui, C. 1994. `Welfare State Development in a World System Context: Event History Analysis of First Social Insurance Legislation Among 60 Countries, 1880-1960', in T. Janoski and A. Hicks (eds.), The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Vogler, C. M. 1985. The Nation State: The Neglected Dimension of Class. Aldershot, Hants: Gower.
61.
Wallerstein, I. 1974. The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.
62.
Wallerstein, I. 1980. The Modern World System II: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy. New York: Academic Press.
63.
Weede, E. and Kummer, J.1985. `Some Criticisms of Recent Work on World System Status, Inequality and Democracy'. International Journal of Comparative Sociology26 (3-4):132-148.
64.
Wright, E. O.1976. `Class Boundaries in Advanced Capitalist Societies'. New Left Review, 98, July/August: 3-41.
65.
Wright, E. O., Hachen, D., Costell, C. and Sprague, J.1982. `The American Class Structure'. American Sociological Review47:709-726.
66.
Wright, E. O. 1985. Classes. London: Verso.
67.
Wright, E. O. and Kwang-Yeong Shin. 1988. `Temporality and Class Analysis: A Comparative Study of the Effects of Class Trajectory and Class Structure in Sweden and the United States'. Sociological Theory6:58-84.
68.
Zhao, D-X. and Hall, J. A.1994. `State Power and Pattern of Late Development: Resolving the Crisis of the Sociology of Development'. Sociology28:211-229.
