On Methodological Relativism and Parochial Empiricism: A Reply to Collins

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society. London: Sage.

Benton, T. 1991. `Biology and Social Science'. Sociology 25:1-29.

Cole, S. 1992. Making Science: Between Nature and Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Collins, H. M. 1996. `Theory Dopes: A Critique of Murphy'. Sociology 30:367-373.

Collins, H. M. and Pinch, T. 1979. `The Construction of the Paranormal: Nothing Unscientific is Happening', in R. Wallis (ed.), On the Margins of Science. University of Keele: Sociological Review Monograph, No. 27.

Dunlap, R. and Catton, W. 1994. `Struggling with Human Exemptionalism'. American Sociologist 25:5-30.

Laudan, L. 1984. Science and Values. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Laudan, L. 1996. Beyond Positivism and Relativism: Theory, Method, and Evidence. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.

Mulkay, M. , Potter, J. and Yearley, S. 1983. `Why an Analysis of Scientific Discourse is Needed', in K. Knorr-Cetina , and M. Mulkay , (eds.), Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. London: Sage.

10.

Murphy, R. 1994. `The Sociological Construction of Science Without Nature'. Sociology 28:957-974.