This paper is an examination of the development of standpoint epistemologies and their impact on the objective status of scientific knowledge. I explore both the origins of these epistemologies and their ironical maintenance of a textual or social realism while dispensing with the natural realism of science. I argue that both scientific realism and standpoint epistemologies are in need of a new, reconfigured understanding of realism. Borrowing from the work of Steve Shapin, Niklas Luhmann and Stephan Fuchs, I contend that realism can best be viewed as an associational code which links people together into a scientific community and differentiates science from other forms of life. Without these codes, science becomes something entirely different.
Ashmore, M. 1989. The Reflexive Thesis: Wrighting Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Bacon, F. 1961. The Works of Francis Bacon, Vol. IV, (ed.) by J. Spedding, R. L. Ellis and D. D. Heath. London: Longman.
3.
Bacon, F. 1993. `From Novum Organum or True Suggestions for the Interpretation of Nature', in V. Potter, (ed.), Readings in Epistemology. New York: Fordham University Press.
4.
Baudrillard, J. 1988. Jean Baudrillard: Selected Writings, (ed.) by M. Poster. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
5.
Biagioli, M. 1993. Galileo, Courier: The Practice of Science in The Culture of Absolutism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Callon, M. 1986. `Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieux Bay', in J. Law, (ed.), Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge. Keele: Keele Sociological Review Monograph.
7.
Collins, H.1981. `What is TRASP? The Radical Programme as a Methodological Imperative'. Philosophy of the Social Sciences11:215-224.
8.
Collins, H. M. 1985. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. London: Sage Publications.
9.
Collins, P. 1990. Black Feminist Thought. Boston, Mass.: Unwin Hyman.
10.
Daston, L.1992. `Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective'. Social Studies of Science22:597-618.
11.
DeMan, P. 1971. Blindness and Insight: Studies in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
Derrida, J. 1976. Of Gramatology, trans. by G. Spivak. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13.
Durkheim, E. 1965. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, trans. by J. W. Swain. London: Allen and Unwin.
14.
Durkheim, E. 1983. Pragmatism and Sociology, trans. by J. C. Whitehouse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Durkheim, E. and Mauss, M. 1963. Primitive Classification, trans. by R. Needham. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Fee, E. 1983. `Women's Nature and Scientific Objectivity' in M. Lowe and R. Hubbard, (eds.), Women's Nature: Rationalizations of Inequality. Elmsford, NY.: Pergamon Press.
17.
Fish, S. 1989. Doing What Comes Naturally. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
18.
Foucault, M.1971. `Orders of Discourse'. Social Science Information10:7-30.
19.
Foucault, M. 1972. The Archeology of Knowledge, trans. by A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books.
20.
Foucault, M. 1979. `Power and Norm: Notes', in M. Morris and P. Patton (eds.), Michel Foucault: Power, Truth and Strategy. Sydney: Feral Publications.
Fuchs, S. and Ward, S.1994. `What is Deconstruction and Where and When Does it Take Place? Making Facts in Science; Building Cases in Law. American Sociological Review59:481-500.
23.
Fuchs, S.1996. `The New Wars of Truth: Conflicts over Science Studies as Differential Modes of Observation'. Social Science Information35:307-326.
24.
Fuchs, S. n.d. `The Social Structure of Objectivity'. Unpublished research, University of Virginia.
25.
Fuller, S. 1988. Social Epistemology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
26.
Gross, A. 1990. The Rhetoric of Science. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
27.
Gross, P. and Levitt, N. 1994. Higher superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Sciences. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28.
Halberg, M.1989. `Feminist Epistemology: An Impossible Project?'Radical Philosophy53:3-7.
29.
Harding, S. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
30.
Harding, S. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
31.
Harding, S.1992. `After the Neutrality Idea: Science, Politics, and Strong Objectivity'. Social Research59:567-587.
32.
Harding, S. (ed.) 1993. The `Racial' Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
33.
Hartsock, N. 1983. `The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Grounds for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism', in S. Harding and M. Hintikka, (eds.), Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel.
34.
Hekman, S. 1990. Gender and Knowledge: Elements of a Postmodern Feminism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
35.
Hekman, S.1997. `Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited'. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society22:341-365.
36.
Hull, D. 1988. Science as Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Knorr-Cetina, K.1994. `Primitive Classification and Postmodernity: Towards a Sociological Notion of Fiction'. Theory, Culture & Society11:1-22.
38.
Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
39.
Latour, B. 1988. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
40.
Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
41.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. 1986, 2nd edn.Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
Laudan, L.1982. `A Note on Collin's Blend of Relativism and Empiricism. Social Studies of Science12: 131-132.
43.
Lawson, H. 1985. Reflexivity: The Post-Modern Predicament. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court.
44.
Leplin, J. (ed.). 1984. Scientific Realism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
Locke, J. 1975 [1690]. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, (ed.) by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Claredon Press.
46.
Loughlin, J. 1993. `The Feminist Challenge to Social Studies of Science', in T. Brante, S. Fuller and W. Lynch (eds.) Controversial Science: From Content to Contention, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
47.
Luhmann, N. 1989. Ecological Communication, trans. by J. Bednarz, Jr. Cambridge: Polity Press.
48.
Nicholson, L. (ed.) 1990. Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge.
49.
Nietzsche, F. 1955. Beyond Good and Evil. Chicago: Henry Regnery Co..
50.
Nietzsche, F. 1976. The Portable Nietzsche, (ed.) and trans. by W. Kaufmann. New York: Penguin.
51.
O'Neil, J. 1995. The Poverty of Postmodernism. New York: Routledge.
52.
Pickering, A.1994. `The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emergence in the Sociology of Science'. American Journal of Sociology99:559-589.
53.
Putnam, H. 1975. Mathematics, Matter and Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Rorty, R. 1991. Objectivity, Relativism and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Rudwick, M. 1985. The Great Devonian Controversy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
Said, E. 1983. The World, the Text, and the Critic. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
57.
Schmitt, F. 1994. Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield.
58.
Shapin, S.1988. `The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-Century England'. Isis79: 373-404.
59.
Shapin, S. 1994. A Social History of Truth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60.
Shapiro, B. 1983. Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.
61.
Sokal, A.1996. `A Physicist Experiments with Cultural Studies'. Lingua FrancaMay/June:62-64.
62.
Spurr, D. 1994. The Rhetoric of Empire: Colonial Discourse in Journalism, Travel Writing, and Imperial Administration. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
63.
Ward, S.1995. `The Making of Serious Speech: A Social Theory of Professional Discourse'. Current Perspectives in Social Theory15:63-81.
64.
Ward, S. 1996. Reconfiguring Truth: Postmodernism, Science Studies and the Search for a New Model of Knowledge. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield.
65.
Woolgar, S. and Ashmore, M. 1988. `The Next Step: An Introduction to the Reflexive Project', in S. Woolgar, (ed.), Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Sage.
