Sociological reconceptualisations of the structure/agency divide have motivated important theoretical advances in the discipline, and the development of `structuration theories' and `analytical dualism' has promoted fresh thought about dominant views of the human agent. These approaches have sought to release sociology from any residual reliance on the oversocialised conception of the individual that formed part of the legacy of Parsonian sociology. It is the argument of this paper, however, that while structuration theory and analytical dualism focus on the creative powers of human reflexivity, as part of their rejection of the `oversocialised agent', the theoretical weight they place on consciousness neglects the socially shaped somatic bases of action and structure, and results in an undersocialised view of the embodied agent.
If the relationship between socialisation and agency needs analysing in terms of embodiment as much as in terms of the cognitive internalisation of norms and values, however, there are good reasons for structuration theory and analytical dualism rejecting attempts to ground subsequent notions of the embodied agent they may develop in dominant, static notions of the habitus. These minimise creativity and make it difficult to analyse social change. An important challenge for future reconceptualisations of the structure/agency divide, then, is to construct a sociology which recognises the significance for human agency of a socially shaped form of embodiment, yet which refuses to make the embodied actor a mere product of society.
Alexander, J. 1984. Theoretical Logic in Sociology, Vol. 4. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
2.
Alexander, J. 1995. Fin de Sièle Social Theory. London: Verso.
3.
Archer, M. 1979. Social Origins of Educational Systems. London: Sage.
4.
Archer, M.1982. `Morphogenesis versus Structuration: On Combining Structure and Action'. British Journal of Sociology33:455-483.
5.
Archer, M. 1988. Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Archer, M. 1990. `Human Agency and Social Structure: A Critique of Giddens', in J. Clark, C. Modgil and S. Modgil (eds.), Anthony Giddens: Consensus and Controversy. London: Falmer.
7.
Archer, M. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Archer, M.1996. `Social Integration and System Integration: Developing the Distinction'. Sociology30:679-699.
9.
Bauman, Z. 1993. Postmodern Ethics. Cambridge: Polity.
10.
Benton, T.1991. `Biology and Social Science: Why the Return of the Repressed Should be Given a (Cautious) Welcome'. Sociology26:225-232.
11.
Berger, P. 1990 [1967] The Sacred Canopy. New York: Anchor Books.
12.
Berman, M. 1982. All That Is Solid Melts into Air. London: Verso.
13.
Bhaskar, R. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.
14.
Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Oxford: Blackwell.
15.
Burkitt, I.1996. `Social Relationships and Emotions'. Sociology30:
16.
Classen, C. 1993. The Worlds of Sense. London: Routledge.
17.
Collins, R. 1988. `Goffman as a Systematic Social Theorist', in P. Drew and A. Wootton (eds.) Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order. Cambridge: Polity.
18.
Collins, R.1993. `Emotional Energy as the Common Denominator of Rational Action'. Rationality and Society5:203-230.
19.
Connell, R. W. 1995. Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity.
20.
Craib, I. 1992. Anthony Giddens. London: Routledge.
21.
Craib, I.1995. `Some Comments on the Sociology of the Emotions'. Sociology29: 151-158.
22.
Davis, K. 1995. Reshaping the Female Body. London: Routledge.
23.
Dawe, A.1970. `The Two Sociologies'. British Journal of Sociology21:207-218.
24.
Durkheim, E. 1995 [1912]. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, trans. Karen E. Fields. New York: Free Press.
25.
Elias, N. 1978 [1939]. The Civilizing Process Vol. 1: The History of Manners. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
26.
Elias, N. 1982 [1939]. The Civilizing Process Vol. 2: State Formation and Civilization. Oxford: Blackwell.
27.
Falk, P. 1994. The Consuming Body. London: Sage.
28.
Fararo, T. J. 1996. `Foundational Problems in Theoretical Sociology', in J. Clark (ed.) James S. Coleman. London: Falmer Press.
29.
Featherstone, M. and Burrows, R.1995. `Cultures of Technological Embodiment: An Introduction'. Body & Society1, Nos. 3-4:1-19.
30.
Fineman, S. 1993. Emotions in Organisations. London: Sage.
31.
Firestone, S. 1971. The Dialectic of Sex. London: Jonathon Cape.
32.
Frank, A. 1991. `For A Sociology of the Body; An Analytical Review', in M. Featherstone, M. Hepworth and B. S. Turner (eds.) The Body: Social Process and Cultural Theory. London: Sage.
33.
Freund, P. and McGuire, M. 1991. Health, Illness and the Social Body. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34.
Giddens, A. 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Hutchinson.
35.
Giddens, A. 1978., Durkheim. London: Fontana.
36.
Giddens, A. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory. Houndmills: Macmillan.
37.
Giddens, A. 1981. `Agency, Institution and Time-Space Analysis', in K. Knorr-Cetina and A. Cicourel (eds.) Advances in Social Theory and Methodology. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
38.
Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity.
39.
Giddens, A. 1987. `Structuralism, Post-Structuralism and the Production of Culture', in A. Giddens and J. Turner (eds.) Social Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity.
40.
Giddens, A. 1989. `Response to my Critics', in D. Held and J. Thompson (eds.) Social Theory of Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and His Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Giddens, A. 1990a. `Structuration Theory and Sociological Analysis', in J. Clark, C. Modgil and S. Modgil (eds.) Anthony Giddens: Consensus and Controversy. London: Falmer.
42.
Giddens, A. 1990b. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
43.
Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity.
44.
Giddens, A. 1992. The Transformation of Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity.
45.
Giddens, A. 1994a. Beyond Left and Right. Cambridge: Polity.
46.
Giddens, A. 1994b. `Living in a Post-Traditional Society', in U. Beck, A. Giddens and S. Lash, Reflexive Modernization. Cambridge: Polity.
47.
Goffman, E.. 1959. `On Cooling the Mark Out'. Psychiatry15:451-463.
48.
Goffman, E. 1968. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
49.
Goffman, E. 1969. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
50.
Goffman, E.1983. `Presidential Address: The Interaction Order'. American Sociological Review48:1-17.
51.
Heim, M.1995. `The Design of Virtual Reality'. Body & Society1, Nos. 3-4:65-77.
52.
Hochschild, A.1979. `Emotion work, Feeling Rules and Social Structure'. American Journal of Sociology85:551-575.
53.
Hochschild, A. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
54.
Hochschild, A.1989. `Reply to cas Wouter's review essay'. Theory, Culture and Society6:439-445.
55.
Homans, G.1964. `Bringing Men Back In'. American Sociological Review29:809-818.
56.
Honneth, A. and Joas, H. 1988. Social Action and Human Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Jary, D. and Jary, J.1995. `The Transformations of Anthony Giddens—The Continuing Story of Structuration Theory'. Theory, Culture and Society12:141-160.
58.
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
Knorr-Cetina, K. and Cicourel, A. (eds.) 1981. Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Marco-Sociologies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
60.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61.
Layder, D. 1994. Understanding Social Theory. London: Sage.
Levine, D. 1995. Visions of the Sociological Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64.
Lockwood, D. 1964. `Social Integration and System Integration', in G. K. Zollschan and W. H. Hirsch (eds.) Explorations in Social Change. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
65.
Maffesoli, M. 1996. The Time of the Tribes. London: Sage.
66.
Marx, K. and Engels, F. 1968 [1872]. `Manifesto of the Communist Party', in K. Marx and F. Engels, Selected Works in One Volume. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
67.
Marx, K. and Engels, F. 1970. The German Ideology. Edited and introduced by C. J. Arthur. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
68.
Mauss, M.1973 [1934]. `Techniques of the Body'. Economy and Society2:70-88.
69.
Mellor, P. A. and Shilling, C. 1997. Re-Forming the Body: Religion, Community and Modernity, London: Sage.
Mouzelis, N. 1995. Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong. London: Routledge.
72.
Outhwaite, W. 1990. `Agency and Structure', in J. Clark, C. Modgil and S. Modgil (eds.) Anthony Giddens: Consensus and Controversy. London: Falmer.
73.
Parsons, T. 1991 [1951]. The Social System. London: Routledge.
74.
Parsons, T.1962. `Comment on “The Oversocialized Conception of Man” by Dennis Wrong'. Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytic Review10:322-334.
75.
Rawls, A. W.1987. `The Interaction Order Sui Generis: Goffman's Contribution to Social Theory'. Sociological Theory5:136-149.
76.
Robertson, R. 1992. Globalization. London: Sage.
77.
Shilling, C. 1993. The Body and Social Theory. London: Sage.
78.
Shilling, C.1997. `Emotions, Embodiment and the Sensation of Society'. Sociological Review45:195-219.
79.
Shilling, C. and Mellor, P. A.1996. `Embodiment, Structuration Theory and Modernity: Mind/Body Dualism and the Repression of Sensuality'. Body & Society2, No 14:1-15.
80.
Shilling, C. and Mellor, P. A. forthcoming. `Durkheim, Morality and Modernity: Collective Effervescence, Homo Duplex and the Sources of Moral Action'. British Journal of Sociology.
81.
Turner, B. S. 1996, 2nd edn [1984]. The Body and Society. London: Sage.
82.
Warner, R. Stephen. 1978. `Toward a Redefinition of Action Theory'. American Journal of Sociology83:1317-1349.
83.
Wrong, D.1961. `The Oversocialized Conception of Man in Modern Sociology'. American Sociological Review26:183-192.
