This paper adopts an ethnomethodological approach towards the study of radicalism in legal professional practice, focusing on the ways in which radicalism was produced, displayed and exhibited in the talk and actions of a small firm of solicitors situated in one of the inner city areas of a large city in northern England. Three aspects of radicalism are examined: radicalism as a public phenomenon; radicalism as a contestable phenomenon; and radicalism as a moral framework. It is suggested that this analytic approach has implications for the way we might study other forms of contemporary radicalism, and for the way in which radicals in the academy theorise and understand the world of the radical lawyer.
Anderson, I. G. and Lee, J. R. E. 1982. `Taking Professor Gluckman Seriously: The Case of Participant Observation'. R. Frankenburg (ed.) Custom and Conflict in British Society. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 286-312.
2.
Atkinson, J. M. and Drew, P. 1979. Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Court Settings. London: Macmillan.
3.
Bankowksi, Z. and Mungham, G. 1976. Images of Law. London: Routledge.
4.
Bittner, E.1963. `Radicalism and the Organisation of Radical Movements'. American Sociological Review28: 928-940.
5.
Black, J. 1971. Radical Lawyers. New York: Avebury.
6.
Blake, N.1975. `The Role of the Radical Lawyer'. Haldane Society Bulletin2, 2: 3-8.
7.
Carlen, P. 1976. Magistrates' Justice. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
8.
Cuff, E. C., Sharrock, W. W. and Francis, D. W. 1990. Perspectives in Sociology. London: Unwin Hyman.
9.
Economides, K. and Hanson, O. 1991. `Critical Legal Practice: Beyond Abstract Radicalism'. Paper given at Joint Meetings of the Law and Society Association and Research Committee on the Sociology of Law of the International Sociological Association, University of Amsterdam, June 1991.
10.
Fitzpatrick, J. 1992. `Legal Practice and Socialist Practice'. I. Grigg-Spall and P. Ireland (eds.) The Critical Lawyers' Handbook. London: Pluto Press: 149-156.
11.
Garfinkel, H. 1984. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
Garfinkel, H. and Sacks, H. 1970. `On Formal Structures of Practical Actions'. J. C. McKinney and E. A. Tiryakian (eds.) Theoretical Sociology. New York: Appleton Century Crofts: 338-366.
13.
Garfinkel, H. and Wieder, L. 1992. `Two Incommensurably, Asymmetrically Alternate Technologies of Social Analysis'. G. Watson and R. M. Seiler (eds.) Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology. London: Sage.
14.
Grigg-Spall, I. and Ireland, P. (eds.) 1992. The Critical Lawyers' Handbook. London: Pluto Press.
15.
Hammersley, M.1990. `What's Wrong with Ethnography? The Myth of Theoretical Description'. Sociology24, 4: 507-615.
16.
Heritage, J. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17.
Hobbs, D. 1988. Doing the Business. London: Clarendon Press.
18.
Hunt, A.1980. `The Radical Critique of Law: An Assessment'. International Journal of the Sociology of Law8: 33-46.
19.
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: Sage.
20.
Moerman, M.1965. `Ethnic Identification in a Complex Civilisation: Who are the Lue?'American Anthropologist67: 1215-1230.
21.
Mulkay, M. 1980. Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. London: George Allen and Unwin.
22.
Mulkay, M. and Gilbert, G. N.1982. `Accounting for Error'. Sociology16: 165-183.
23.
Mungham, G. and Thomas, P.1979. `Advocacy and the Solicitor-Advocate in the Magistrates' Courts in England and Wales'. International Journal of the Sociology of Law7, 2: 169-196.
24.
Pollner, M. 1974. `Explicative Transactions: Making and Managing Meaning in Traffic Court'. G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language. New York: Irvington Publishers: 227-256.
25.
Sandy, P. R. 1979. `The Ethnographic Paradigm(s)'. J. Van Maanen (ed.) Qualitative Methodology. Beverley Hills: Sage.
26.
Scheingold, S. A.1988. `Radical Lawyers and Socialist Ideals'. Journal of Law and Society15, 1: 122-138.
27.
Stanley, L.1990. `Doing Ethnography, Writing Ethnography: A Comment on Hammersley'. Sociology24, 4: 617-627.
28.
Travers, M. H. 1991. `The Reality of Law: An Ethnographic Study of an Inner-City Law Firm'. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manchester.
29.
Van Maanen, J., Dabbs, J. M. and Faulkner, R. R. (eds.) 1982. Varieties of Qualitative Research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
30.
Watson, G.1987. `Make me reflexive - but not yet: Strategies for managing essential reflexivity in ethnographic discourse'. Journal of Anthropological Research43, 1: 29-41.
31.
Watson, D. R. and Sharrock, W. W. 1989. `Something on Accounts'. Discourse Analysis Research Group Newsletter.
32.
Wieder, D. L. 1974. Language and Social Reality: The Case of Telling the Convict Code. The Hague: Mouton.
