Does Class Analysis without Class Theory have a Promising Future?: A Reply to Goldthorpe and Marshall

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blau, P.M. and Duncan, O.D. 1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York: Wiley.

Goldblatt, P. 1990. `Mortality and Alternative Classifications' in Longitudinal Study: Mortality and Social Organisation. HMSO: London: 163-192.

Goldthorpe, John H. and Hope, K. 1974. The Social Grading of Occupations: a New Approach and Scale. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Goldthorpe, John H. (with C. Llewellyn and C. Payne ) 1980. Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press (Second Edition 1987).

Goldthorpe, John H. 1983. `Women and Class Analysis'. Sociology 17:483-488.

Goldthorpe, John H. and Payne, C. 1986. `Trends in Integenerational Class Mobility in England and Wales 1972-1983'. Sociology 20:1-24.

Goldthorpe, John H. and Marshall, G. 1992. `The Promising Future of Class Analysis'. Sociology 26:381-400.

Marshall, G. 1990. `John Goldthorpe and Class Analysis' in J. Clark , C. Modgil and S. Modgil (eds.) John H. Goldthorpe: Consensus and Controversy. London: Falmer.

Pahl, R.E. 1989. `Is the Emperor Naked? Some Comments on the Adequacy of Sociological Theory in Urban and Regional Research'. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 13:709-720.

10.

Pahl, R.E. 1992. `What is Left in Class Analysis?' Paper delivered to the Nuffield College, Oxford seminar in response to an earlier, longer, version of Goldthorpe and Marshall `The Promising Future...' Unpublished.