The study of biography as an exercise in sociology has been under-used. The early proponents of a sociology of biography—most notably Wilhelm Dilthey—have not had their work greatly developed. However, with the emergence of Paul Ricoeur's work on the nature of narrativity, time and interpretation, plus the developing influence of the work of others, a hermeneutics of biography has now begun. This paper explores this development, and, further, briefly examines two highly important biographies to explore how theoretical injunction is matched by empirical practice.
SCHLEIERMACHER, FREDRICH . 1966. Brief Outline on the Study of Theology. Atlanta: John Knox.
23.
SCHLEIERMACHER, FREDRICH . 1977. Hermeneutik und Kritik. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.
24.
STANLEY, Liz (ed.). 1984. The Diaries of Hannah Cullwick. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
25.
STANLEY, Liz . 1986. `Biography as Microscope or Kaleidoscope? The Case of Hannah Cullwick's Relationship with Arthur Munby'. Studies in Sexual Politics 13/14 (double issue):28-52.
26.
THOMAS, WILLIAM MOY . 1858. `Richard Savage'. Notes and Queries (Second series) VI: 361-365, 385-389, 425-428, 445-448.
27.
WHITE, HAYDN . 1991. `The Metaphysics of Narrativity' in David Wood (ed.) On Paul Ricoeur. London: Routledge.
28.
WOOLF, VIRGINIA . 1967. Collected Essays Volume IV. London: Hogarth Press.
