This paper discusses a number of problems with labour process accounts of worker subjectivity. They are manifested as ambiguities about the meaning of worker behaviour, and have their origins in conflicting ideological requirements of Marxism and assumptions of immanence. We argue that it is these theoretical precepts, rather than cumulating empirical knowledge, which have driven debates on the labour process and interpretations of behaviour in the workplace. We show how essentially similar activities are construed as either reproducing capitalist relations or resisting them, according to the theoretical needs of the labour process pardigm. Compounding this interpretive problem is the insistence of labour process theorists that the point of production is the key source of worker consciousness in capitalist society. We conclude that labour process is incapable of theoretical growth because of its non-cumulative circulation of explanations and fixation on the workplace. In its place we advocate more inductive empirical approaches to the study of consciousness.
Antonio, R.1981. `Immanent Critique as the Core of Critical Theory: its Origins and Development in Hegel, Marx and Contempory Thought'British Journal of Sociology. 32, 3:330-345.
2.
Apple, M.1980. `The Other Side of the Hidden Curriculum: Correspondence Theories and the Labour Process.'Interchange. 11, 3:5-27.
3.
Bott, E. 1957. Family and Social Network. London: Tavistock.
4.
Braverman, H.Labour and Monopoly Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
5.
Bulmer, M. 1975. `Some Problems of Research into Class Imagery' in M. Bulmer (ed.) Working Class Images of Society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
6.
Burawoy, M. 1979. Manufacturing Consent. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Burawoy, M. 1985. The Politics of Production. London: Verso.
8.
Caplow, T. 1964. The Sociology of Work. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Clawson, D. and Fantasia, R.1983. `Beyond Bureaucracy: The Dialectics of Conflict and Consent on the Shopfloor.'Theory and Society12:671-680.
10.
Cohen, S.1987. `A Labour Process to Nowhere.'New Left Review165:34-50.
11.
Crouch, C. 1982. Trade Unions: The Logic of Collective Action. Glasgow: Fontana.
12.
Davies, S.1990. `Inserting Gender into Burawoy's Theory of the Labour Process.'Work, Employment and Society4, 3:391-406.
13.
Dubin, R.1956. `Industrial Workers' Worlds: A Study of the Central Life Interests of Industrial Workers.'Social Problems3:131-142.
14.
Edwards, R. 1979. Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century. London: Heinemann.
15.
Eicher, D. 1989. Occupation and Class Consciousness in America. New York: Greenwood Press.
16.
Form, W.1987. `On the Degradation of Skills.'Annual Review of Sociology13:29-47.
17.
Friedman, A. 1977. Industry and Labour. London: Macmillan.
18.
Gallie, D. 1978. In Search of the New Working Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Gallie, D. 1984. Social Inequality and Class Radicalism in Britain and France. Cambridge University Press.
20.
Gartman, D. 1986. Auto Slavery: The Labour Process in the American Automobile Industry 1897-1950. Rutgers University Press.
21.
Goldthorpe, J. 1988. `Intellectuals and the Working Class in Modern Britain' in David Rose (ed.) Social Stratification and Economic Change. London: Hutchinson.
22.
Goldthorpe, J.H., Lockwood, D.et al. 1968. The Affluent Worker: Industrial Attitudes and Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Gordon, D., Edwards, R. and Reich, M. 1982. Segmented Work, Divided Workers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Halle, D. 1988. America's Working Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Hamilton, R. 1967. Affluence and the French Worker in the Fourth Republic. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
26.
Hargreaves, A.1982. `Resistance and Relative Autonomy Theories: Problems of Distortion and Incoherence in Recent Analyses of Education'. British Journal of Sociology of Education3, 2:107-126.
27.
Heron, C. and Storey, R. 1986. `On the Job in Canada.' in C. Heron and R. Storey (eds.) On the Job. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
28.
Katznelson, I. and Zolberg, A. (eds.) 1986. Working Class Formation: Nineteenthcentury patterns in Western Europe and the United States. New Jersey; Princeton University Press.
Knights, D. and Wilmott, H.1989. `Power and Subjectivity at Work: From Degradation to Subjugation in Social Relationships'. Sociology23, 4:535-557.
31.
Langford, T. 1990. `Social Experiences and Variations in Canadian Workers' Economic Beliefs'. Paper presented at the twenty-fifth annual meeting of the Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Association.
32.
Lash, S. 1884. Militant Workers: Class and Radicalism in France and America. London: Heinemann.
33.
Low-Beer, J. 1978. Protest and Participation: The New Working-class in Italy. Cambridge University Press.
34.
Littler, C. 1990. `The Labour Process Debate: A Theoretical Review 1974-1988' in D. Knights and C. Wilmott (eds.) Labour Process Theory.
35.
Littler, C. and Salaman, G.1982. `Bravermania and Beyond: Recent Theories of the Labour Process'Sociology. 16, 2.
36.
Mann, M. 1973. Consciousness and Action Among the Western Working Class. London: Macmillan.
37.
Marshall, G.1983. `Some Remarks on the Study of Working Class Consciousness.'Politics and Society12, 3:263-301.
38.
Murphy, R. and Morris, R.1961. `Occupational Situs, Subjective Identification and Political Affiliation'. American Sociological Review26:383-392.
39.
Myles, J.1988. `The Expanding Middle: Some Canadian Evidence on the Deskilling Debate.'Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology25:335-364.
40.
Parkin, F. 1979. Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique. London: Tavistock.
41.
Peck, G.1982. `The Labour Process According to Burawoy: Limits of a Non-dialectical Approach to Capitalist Workplace Relations.'Insurgent Socialist11, 3:81-90.
42.
Penn, R. 1982. ` “The Contested Terrain”: a critique of R. C. Edwards' theory of working class fractions and politics' in G. Day (ed.) Diversity and Decomposition in the Labour Market. London: Grower.
43.
Penn, R. 1990. Class Power and Technology: Skilled Workers in Britain and America. London: Polity.
44.
Salaman, G. 1986. Working. London: Tavistock.
45.
Scase, R. 1989. Social Democracy in Capitalist Society. London: Croom Helm.
46.
Storey, J.1985. `The Means of Management Control'. Sociology19, 7:193-211.
47.
Tanner, J. 1987. `Manual Workers and the Perception of Social Class: An Edmonton Case Study' in D. Livingstone (ed.) Working People and Hard Times: Canadian Perspectives. Toronto: Garamond Press.
48.
Thompson, P. 1983. The Nature of Work. London: Macmillan.
49.
Thompson, P. 1990. `Crawling from the Wreckage: The Labour Process and the Politics of Production' in D. Knights and H. Wilmott (eds.) Labour Process Theory. London: Macmillan.
50.
Vallas, S.1991. `Workers, Firms and the Dominant Ideology: Hegemony and Consciousness in the Monopoly Core'. Sociological Quarterly32:61-83.
51.
Van Den Berg, A. 1988. The Immanent Utopia. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
52.
Wells, D. 1986. `Auto Workers on the Firing Line' in C. Heron and R. Storey (eds.) On the Job: Confronting the Labour Process in Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
