Strategic Context Analysis: A New Research Strategy for Structuration Theory

Abstract

This article argues that a new form of methodological bracketing, strategic context analysis, is required by structuration theory if it is to meet the growing criticism best summed up by Nigel Thrift's complaint that it is all micro-situations and world-empires with nothing much in between. Analysis directed towards the strategic context of action can help to provide this `missing institutional link'. The parameters of strategic context analysis are outlined and distinguished from three other forms of analysis associated with structuration theory. The strategic context itself is broken down into its technicist and hermeneutic dimensions and it is suggested that an emphasis on the latter is essential if one is to avoid the reification of structures. A number of illustrative examples - the identities of Tory women, stances towards the French Revolution and Harold Wilson's `pound in your pocket' - are enlisted in order to illustrate the range of questions which could be addressed by a research strategy guided by strategic context analysis.

`Gregory smiled. His mother's tendency to the enigmatic was definitely increasing. Someone who didn't know her might have thought her mind was wandering; but Gregory knew there was always a sure point of reference, something which in her own terms made sense. Probably it just took too long to explain. Gregory wondered if this was what being old meant: everything you wanted to say required a context. If you gave the full context, people thought you a rambling old fool. If you didn't give the context, people thought you a laconic old fool. The very old needed interpreters just as the very young did. When the old lost their companions, their friends, they also lost their interpreters: they lost love, but they also lost the full power of speech.' - Julian Barnes, Staring at the Sun

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

The Banker . 1967. `Commentary'. October:827-828.

Barnes, J. 1987. Staring at the Sun. London: Picador.

Bauman, Z. 1989a. Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bauman, Z. 1989. Hermeneutics and Modern Social Theory', in Held, D. and Thompson, J.B. Social Theory of Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and His Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bhaskar, R. 1978. A Realist Theory of Science. Brighton: Harvester.

Campbell, B. 1987. The Iron Ladies: Why do Women Vote Tory. London: Virago Press.

Carr, D. 1986. `Narrative and the Real World: An Argument for Continuity', History and Theory 25:117-131.

Carr, D. 1986. Time, Narrative and History. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.

Cohen, I.J. 1989. Structuration Theory: Anthony Giddens and the Constitution of Social Life. London: Macmillan.

10.

Crow, G. 1989. `The Use of the Concept of “Strategy” in Recent Sociological Literature'. Sociology 23:1-24.

11.

Freeman, M. 1990. `Speaking About the Unspeakable: The `Genocide' Problematic: Reality, Ethics, Discourse'. Paper presented to the workshop on Theories of Political Violence at the European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions, Bochum, 2-7 April.

12.

Giddens, A. 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Hutchinson.

13.

Giddens, A. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Macmillan.

14.

Giddens, A. 1981. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism, vol. 1. London: Macmillan.

15.

Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.

16.

Giddens, A. 1985. The Nation State and Violence, Cambridge: Polity Press.

17.

Giddens, A. 1989. `A Reply to My Critics', in Held, D. and Thompson, J.B. Social Theory of Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and His Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

19.

Gregson, N. 1989. `On the (Ir)relevance of Structuration Theory to Empirical Research', in Held, D. and Thompson, J.B. Social Theory of Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and His Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Hall, S. 1988. The Hard Road to Renewal: Thatcherism and the Crisis of the Left. London: Verso.

21.

Hindess, B. 1987. Politics and Class Analysis Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

22.

Ingham, G. 1984. Capitalism Divided? The City and Industry in British Social Development. London: Macmillan.

23.

Jessop, B. 1982. The Capitalist State: Marxist Theories and Methods, Oxford: Martin Robertson.

24.

Jessop, B. 1983a. `Accumulation Strategies, State Forms, and Hegemonic Projects', Kapitalistate 10/11.

25.

Jessop, B. 1983b. `The Capitalist State and the Rule of Capital: Problems in the Analysis of Business Associations', West European Politics 6 (2).

26.

Jessop, B. 1985. Nicos Poulantzas: Marxist Theory and Political Strategy. London: Macmillan.

27.

Jessop, B. , Bonnett, K. , Bromley, S. and Ling, T. 1988. Thatcherism: A Tale of Two Nations. Cambridge: Polity Press.

28.

Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.

29.

Longstreth, F. 1979. `The City, Industry and the State', in Crouch, C. (ed.) State and Economy in Contemporary Capitalism. London: Croom Helm.

30.

Morante, E. 1985. History: A Novel. Harmondsworth: King Penguin.

31.

Morgan, D. 1989. `Strategies and Sociologists: A Comment on Crow'. Sociology 23:25-29.

32.

Outhwaite, W. 1987. New Philosophies of Social Science: Realism, Hermeneutics and Critical Theory. London: Macmillan.

33.

Poulantzas, N. 1976. State, Power, Socialism. London: Verso.

34.

Rorty, R. 1987. `Method, Social Science and Social Hope', in Gibbons, M.T. Interpreting Politics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

35.

Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

36.

Sayer, A. 1984. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. London: Hutchinson.

37.

Schama, S. 1989. Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution. London: Viking.

38.

Stones, R. 1988. `The Myth of Betrayal: Structure and Agency in the Labour Government's Non-devaluation of the Pound 1964-67'. Ph.D. thesis, University of Essex.

39.

Stones, R. 1990a. `Government-Finance Relations in Britain 1964-67: A Tale of Three Cities'. Economy and Society 19:32-53.

40.

Stones, R. 1990b. `International Monetary Relations, Policy Networks and the Labour Government's Policy of Non-devaluation 1964-67', in Marsh, D. and Rhodes, R.A.W. Policy Networks in British Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

41.

Thompson, J.B. 1984. Studies in the Theory of Ideology. Berkeley/Cambridge: University of California Press/Polity Press.

42.

Thrift, N. 1985. `Bear and Mouse or Tree and Bear? Anthony Giddens's Reconstruction of Social Theory'. Sociology 19:609-623.

43.

Tocqueville, A. de . 1955. The Old Regime and the French Revolution, New York: Anchor Books.