Armacost, M.H. 1969. The Politics of Weapons Innovation: The Thor-Jupiter Controversy. New York: Columbia University Press.
2.
Ball, D. 1974. `Déjà Vu: The Return to Counterforce in the Nixon Administration'. N.p.: California Seminar on Arms Control and Foreign Policy.
3.
Ball, D. 1980. Politics and Force Levels: The Strategic Missile Program of the Kennedy Administration. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
4.
Davis, M. 1982. `Nuclear Imperialism and Extended Deterrence', in New Left Review (ed.), Exterminism and Cold War. London: Verso.
5.
Giddens, A. 1985. The Nation-State and Violence: Volume Two of a Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6.
Giddens, A. 1989. Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
Herken, G. 1985. Counsels of War. New York: Knopf.
8.
Kaplan, F. 1983. The Wizards of Armaggedon. New York: Simon and Schuster.
9.
MacKenzie, D.1984. `Nuclear War Planning and Strategies of Coercion'. New Left Review148:31-56.
10.
Miller, S.E. (ed.) 1984. Strategy and Nuclear Deterrence: An `International Security' Reader. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11.
Ravenal, E.C.1982. `Counterforce and Alliance: The Ultimate Connection'. International Security6(4): 26-43.
12.
Roberts, A. 1985. `Planning to Fight a Nuclear War', in D. MacKenzie and J. Wajcman (eds.), The Social Shaping of Technology, 279-294. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
13.
Rosenberg, D.A.1983. `The Origins of Overkill: Nuclear Weapons and American Strategy, 1945-1960'. International Security7(4): 3-71.
14.
Scheer, R. 1983. With Enough Shovels: Reagan, Bush and Nuclear War. London: Secker and Warburg.