The relationship between gender and professionalisation is a neglected one, and female professional projects have been overlooked in the sociology of professions. The generic notion of profession is also a gendered notion as it takes what are in fact the successful professional projects of class-privileged male actors at a particular point in history and in particular societies to be the paradigmatic case of profession. Instead, it is necessary to speak of `professional projects', to gender the agents of these projects, and to locate these within the structural and historical parameters of patriarchal-capitalism. Professional projects are projects of occupational closure, and a model of occupational closure strategies is needed which captures both the variety of strategies that characterise these projects and the gendered dimensions of these strategies. Such a model is set out and distinguishes between exclusionary, demarcationary, inclusionary and dual strategies of closure. This model is substantiated with material drawn from the emerging medical division of labour in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bell, E.Moberly. 1953. Storming the Citadel: The Rise of the Woman Doctor. London: Constable and Co.
2.
Bellaby, P. and Oribabor, P. 1980. ` “History of the Present” - Contradiction and Struggle in Nursing' in Davies, C. (ed.) Rewriting Nursing History. London: Croom Helm.
3.
Berlant, J. L. 1975. Profession and Monopoly. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
Cowell, B. and Wainwright, D. 1981. Behind the Blue Door: The History of the Royal College of Midwives 1881-1981, London: George Routledge.
5.
Crompton, R.1987. `Gender Status, and Professionalism'. Sociology21:413-428.
6.
Crow, G.1989. `The Use of the Concept of `Strategy' in Recent Sociological Literature'. Sociology, 23:1-24.
7.
Davies, C. (ed.). 1980. Rewriting Nursing History. London: Croom Helm.
8.
Davies, C.1982. `The Regulation of Nursing Work; an Historical Comparison of Britain and the USA'. Research in the Sociology of Health Care. 2:121-160.
9.
Dingwall, R., Rafferty, A. M. and Webster, C. 1988. An Introduction to the Social History of Nursing. London: Routledge.
10.
Donnison, J. 1977. Midwives and Medical Men. London: Heinemann.
11.
Ehrenreich, B. and English, D. 1978. For Her Own Good: 150 Years of the Experts Advice to Women. New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
12.
Freidson, E. 1970. Professional Dominance: The Social Structure of Medical Care. New York: Atherton Press.
13.
Freidson, E. 1970b. Profession of Medicine: A Study in the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York: Harper and Row.
14.
Freidson, E. 1977. `The Future of Professionalism', In Stacey, M. and Reid, M. (eds.) Health and the Division of Labour. London: Croom Helm.
15.
Freidson, E. 1983. `The Theory of Professions; State of the Art', in Dingwall, R. and Lewis, P. (eds.) The Sociology of the Professions. London: Macmillan.
16.
Freidson, E. 1986. Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Gamarnikow, E. 1978. `Sexual Division of Labour; the Case of Nursing', in Kuhn, A. and Wolpe, A. (eds.) Feminism and Materialism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
18.
Jex-Blake, S. 1886. Medical Women: A Thesis and a History. Edinburgh: Oliphant, Andersen and Ferrier.
19.
Johnson, T. 1972. Professions and Power. London: Macmillan.
20.
Johnson, T. 1977. `Professions in the Class Structure', in Scase, R. (ed.) Industrial Society: Class, Cleavage and Control. London: Allen and Unwin.
21.
Johnson, T. 1982. `The State and the Professions: Peculiarities of the British', in Giddens, A. and Mackenzie, G. (eds.) Social Class and the Division of Labour: Essays in Honour of Ilya Neustadt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Kreckel, R.1980. `Unequal Opportunity Structure and Labour Market Segmentation. Sociology, 4:525-550.
23.
Larkin, G. 1983. Occupational Monopoly and Modern Medicine. London: Tavistock.
24.
Larson, M. 1977. The Rise of Professionalism. California: University of California Press.
25.
Larson, M.1979. `Professionalism: Rise and Fall'. International Journal of Health Services9.
26.
MacDonald, K. M.1985. `Social Closure and Occupational Registration'. Sociology19:541-556.
27.
Manton, J. 1965. Elizabeth Garrett Anderson. London: Methuen.
28.
Mark-Lawson, J. and Witz, A.1988. `From Family Labour to Family Wage?: the case of women's labour in nineteenth century coalmining'. Social History13: 151-174.
29.
Murphy, R.1983. `The Struggle for Scholarly Recognition: The Development of the Closure Problematic in Sociology'. Theory and Society12:631-658.
30.
Murphy, R.1984. `The Structure of Closure: A Critique and Development of the Theories of Weber, Collins and Parkin'. British Journal of Sociology35:547-567.
31.
Murphy, R.1985. `Exploitation or Exclusion?'Sociology19:225-243.
32.
Murphy, R.1986. `Weberian Closure Theory: A Contribution to the Ongoing Assessment'. British Journal of Sociology37:21-41.
33.
Murphy, R. 1988. Social Closure: The Theory of Monopolization and Exclusion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
34.
Navarro, V. 1978. Class, Struggle, the State and Medicine: A Historical and Contemporary Analysis of the Medical Sector in Great Britain. London: Martin Robertson.
35.
Parkin, F. 1974. `Strategies of Social Closure in Class Formation', in Parkin, F. (ed.) The Social Analysis of Class Structure. London: Tavistock.
36.
Parkin, F. 1979. Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique. London: Tavistock.
37.
Parry, N. and Parry, J. 1976. The Rise of the Medical Profession. London: Croom Helm.
38.
Rueschemeyer, D. 1986. Power and the Division of Labour. Cambridge: Polity Press.
39.
Savage, M. 1985. `Capitalist and Patriarchal Relations at Work: Preston Cotton Weaving 1890-1940', in Murgatroyd, L.et l. (eds.) Localities, Class and Gender. London: Pion.
40.
Savage, M. 1988. The Dynamics of Working Class Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
Simpson, R. L. and Simpson, I. H. 1969. `Women and Bureaucracy in the Semi-Professions', in Etzioni, A. (ed.) The Semi-Professions and Their Organisation. New York: Free Press.
Thorne, I. 1915. Sketch of the Foundation and Development of the London School of Medicine for Women. London: Women's Printing Society.
44.
Verlusen, M. 1980. `Old Wives' Tales? Women Healers in English History', in Davies, C. (ed.) Rewriting Nursing History. London: Croom Helm.
45.
Vicinus, M.Independent Women: Work and Community for Single Women 1880-1920. London: Virago Press.
46.
Waddington, I. 1977. `General Practitioners and Consultants in Early Nineteenth Century England; The Sociology of an Intra-Professional Conflict', in Woodward, J. and Richards, D. (eds.) Health Care and Popular Medicine in Nineteenth Century England. London: Croom Helm.
47.
Waddington, I. 1984. The Medical Profession in the Industrial Revolution. Ireland: Gill and Macmillan.
48.
Walby, S. 1986. Patriarchy at Work: Patriarchal and Capitalist Relations in Employment. Cambridge: Polity Press.
49.
Westwood, S. 1984. All Day, Every Day: Factory and Family in the Making of Women's Lives. London: Pluto Press.
50.
Witz, A. 1985. Midwifery and the Medical Profession: Sexual Divisions and the Process of Professionalisation, University of Lancaster: Lancaster Regionalism Group Working Paper No. 13.
51.
Witz, A. 1987. `The Spider Legislating for the Fly': Patriarchy and Occupational Closure in the Medical Division of Labour, 1858-1940. University of Lancaster: Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.
