The case for feminist knowledge as an improvement on male-centred sociology is a strong one. Taking a feminist standpoint produces knowledge of gendered meanings and relationships of which we may not be aware and which sociology has generally ignored. This resolves some of the problems posed by male-centred versions of sociology. Taking a feminist standpoint, though, also raises serious problems of how to make both sociological and feminist knowledge convincing. It enables us to improve on existing sociological knowledge, but exposes many further problems which still need attention. The implications of taking a feminist standpoint are explored by considering some methodological problems of improving on a 1960s study of shiftworking women.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arpad, S.S.1986. `Burnout'. Women's Studies International Forum9:207-213.
2.
Acker, J., Barry, K. and Essevold, J.1983. `Objectivity and truth: problems in doing feminist research'. Women's Studies International Forum6:423-435.
3.
Barrett, M.1986. `Do you really want feminist sociology?NetworkMay, 35:20.
4.
Barrett, M.1987. `The concept of difference'. Feminist Review26:29-42.
5.
Bhaskar, R. 1979. The Possibility of Naturalism. Brighton: Harvester.
6.
Bleier, R. 1984. Science and Gender. New York: Pergamon Press.
7.
Bowles, G. and Duelli Klein, R. 1983. Theories of Women's Studies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
8.
B.S.A. Standing Committee on the Equality of the Sexes1986. `Teaching gender - struggle and change in sociology'. Sociology20:347-336.
9.
B.S.A. Standing Committee on the Equality of the Sexes 1987. Workshop on Women and Research. Mimeo.
10.
Cain, M.1986. `Realism, feminism, methodology and law'. International Journal of the Sociology of Law14:255-267.
11.
Cain, M. and Finch, J. 1981. `Towards a rehabilitation of data', in Abrams, P. and others Practice and Progress: British Sociology 1950-1980. London: Allen and Unwin.
12.
Carby, H. 1982. `White women listen! Black feminism and the boundaries of sisterhood', in Birmingham University CCCS, The Empire Strikes Back: Race and Racism in 70s Britain. London: Hutchinson.
Clegg, S.1975. `Feminist methodology - fact or fiction'. Quality and Quantity19:83-97.
15.
Finch, J. 1984. `It's great to have someone to talk to: the ethics and politics of interviewing women', in Bell, C. and Roberts, H. Social Researching: Politics, Problems, Practice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
16.
Flax, J. 1983. `Political philosophy and the patriarchal unconscious: a psychoanalytic perspective on epistemology and metaphysics, in Harding, S. and Hintikka, M. (q.v.).
17.
Flax, J.1987. `Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory'. Signs12:621-643.
18.
Gilroy, P. 1987. `There Ain't No Black in the Union Jack'. London: Hutchinson.
19.
Harding, S. 1983. `Why has the sex/gender system become visible only now?', in Harding, S. and Hintikka, M. (q.v.).
20.
Harding, S. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
21.
Harding, S. and Hintikka, M.B. 1983. Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel.
22.
Hartsock, Nancy C.M. 1983. `The feminist standpoint', in Harding and Hintikka (q.v.).
23.
Hochschild, A.R. 1976. `The sociology of feeling and emotion: selected possibilities', in Millman, R. and Kanter, R.M. Another Voice: Feminist Perspectives on Social Life and Social Science. New York: Octagon Books.
24.
Hooks, B. 1984. Feminist Theory from Margin to Centre. Boston: South End Press.
25.
Hutton, C.R. 1962. Married Women on Full-Time Shiftwork: Some Domestic and Social Consequences. London University. M.A. thesis.
26.
Keat, R. and Urry, J. 1975. Social Theory as Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
27.
Kitzinger, C. 1987. The Social Construction of Lesbianism. London: Sage.
28.
Lorde, A. 1983. `Open letter to Mary Daly', in Moraga and Anzaldua (q.v.).
29.
Mies, M. 1983. `Towards a methodology for feminist research', in Bowles and Duelli Klein (q.v.).
30.
Moraga, C. and Anzaldua, G. 1983. This Bridge Called my Back. (second edition) New York: Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.
31.
Myrdal, A. and Klein, V. 1956. Women's Two Roles: Home and Work. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
32.
Oakley, A. 1981. `Interviewing women: a contradiction in terms', in Roberts, Helen Doing Feminist Research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
33.
Ramazanoglu, C.R. 1989. Feminism and the Contradictions of Oppression. London: Routledge.
34.
Rose, H. 1986. `Beyond masculinist realities: a feminist epistemology for the sciences', in Bleier, R. Feminist Approaches to Science. New York: Pergamon.
35.
Scott, S. 1984. `The personable and the powerful: gender and status in sociological research', in Bell, C. and Roberts, H. Social Researching, Politics, Problems, Practice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
36.
Seidler, Victor J. 1986. Kant, Respect and Injustice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
37.
Smith, D.E.1974. `Women's perspective as a radical critique of sociology'. Sociological Inquiry44:7-13.
38.
Smith, D.E.1986. `Institutional ethnography: a feminist method'. Resources for Feminist Research15:6-13.
39.
Smith, D.E. 1987. The Everyday World as Problematic: a Feminist Sociology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
40.
Stanley, L. and Wise, S. 1983a. Breaking Out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
41.
Stanley, L. and Wise, S. 1983b. `Back into the personal or: our attempt to construct feminist research', in Bowles and Duelli Klein (q.v.).
42.
Winant, T.1987. `The feminist standpoint: a matter of language'. Hypatia2:123-148.
