Invention rates are found to be more proportional to R & D input if organization design is organic-professional rather than mechanistic-bureaucratic in a diverse sample of 110 U.S. factories. However, organic design rules are appropriate only if the work of the organization is small-scale and technically complex. Problems and opportunities associated with incorporating organic design elements into large, high-tech industries are explored and some observations offered on practices in Japanese industries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abnernathy, Thomas and Utterback, James 1982. Patterns of Industrial Innovation in Readings in the Management of Innovation. (Ed. by M.L. Tushman and W.L. Moore). Boston: Pitman.
2.
Abernathy, William 1976. The Productivity Dilemma: Roadblock to Innovation in the Automobile Industry. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
3.
Aiken, Michael and Hage, Jerald1971. `The organic organization and innovation'. Sociology5:63-82.
4.
Aldrich, Howard E. 1979. Organization and Environments. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
5.
Alestalo, Marja 1979. International Comparative Study on the Organization and Performance of Research Units. Paris: UNESCO.
6.
Allen, T.J.1970. Networks in R & D. R & D Management1:14-21.
7.
Azumi, Koya 1985. `Nippon Kigyo wa Dokusosei Yutaka' (The Creativity of Japanese Companies). Nihon Keizai Shimbun. November 30, 1985.
8.
Azumi, Koya and Hull, Frank 1988. `Inventive payoff from R & D in Japanese industry'. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
9.
Azumi, Koya, Hull, Frank and Hage, Jerald 1983. `Managing high technology in an international perspective: A comparison between Japan and the U.S.' in Hiroshi Mannari and H. Befu (eds.) The Challenge of Japan's Internationalization. Tokyo: Kodansha Int. 111-147.
10.
Blau, Peter M. and Schoenherr, Richard A. 1971. The Structure of Organizations. New York: Basic Books.
11.
Blau, Peter M.1972. `Interdependence and hierarchy in organizations'. Social Science ResearchI:1-24.
12.
Blau, Peter, Falbe, Cecilia McHugh, McKinley, William and Tracy, Phelps1976. `Technology and organization in manufacturing'. Administrative Science Quarterly21:20-40.
13.
Burns, T. and Stalker, G.M. 1961. The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock.
14.
Child, John1974. `Strategies of control and organizational behavior'. Administrative Science Quarterly18:1-17.
15.
Collins, Paul, Hage, Jerald and Hull, Frank 1988. Technical Systems: A Framework for Analysis. JAI Press, Vol. 6.
16.
Collins, Paul and Hull, Frank1986. Technology and Span of Control: Woodward Revisited. Journal of Management Studies. 23:2 (March).
17.
Daft, Richard and Becker, Selwyn 1978. Innovation in Organizations: Innovation Adoption in School Organization. New York: Elsevier.
18.
Donaldson, Lex1976. `Woodward, technology, organization structure and productivity: a critique of the universal generalization'. Journal of Management Science13:255-273.
19.
Duncan, Robert B.1976. `Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty'. Administrative Science Quarterly17:313-327.
20.
Galbraith, Jay 1973. Organization Design. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
21.
Gilman, John J. and Siczek, Aldona A.1985. `Optimization of Inventivity'. Research Management. July - August 1985, 29-31.
22.
Hage, Jerald 1980. Theories of Organization. New York: Wiley.
23.
Hage, Jerald and Aiken, Michael 1970. Social Change in Complex Organizations. New York: Random House.
24.
Hannan, Michael and Freeman, John 1977. `Obstacles to comparative studies'. pp. 106-131 in Goodman, P. and Pennings, J. (eds.) New Perspectives on Organizational Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Hickson, David, Pugh, D.S. and Pheysey, Diana C.1981. `Operations technology and organization structure'. Administrative Science Quarterly378-397.
26.
Horvath, Dezo, McMillan, Charles J., Azumi, Koya and Hickson, David J. 1981. `The cultural context of organizational control: an international comparison'. in Hickson, D.J. and McMillan, C.J. (eds.) Organization and Nation: The Aston Programme IV. Guildford, England: Gower.
27.
Hull, Frank M. 1977. `Task uniformity, technology and organizations: a comparative analysis of factories in the United States and Japan and a case study of an American marketing corporation'. Unpublished doctoral thesis: Columbia.
28.
Hull, Frank and Collins, Paul1987. High Tech Batch Production Systems: Woodward's Missing Type. Academy of Management Journal (December).
29.
Hull, Frank and Azumi, Koya 1987. Inventive output from R & D in Japanese Factories. Paper presented to the American Academy of Management, New Orleans. August 10, 1987.
30.
Hull, Frank M. and Hage, Jerald 1987. `Innovation versus productivity: A systems approach to organization performance, (working paper A-1), Newark, N.J.: IPS Program, Rutgers University.
31.
Hull, Frank M. and Hage, Jerald1982. `Organizing for Innovation: beyond Burns and Stalker's organic type'. Sociology16:4:564-577.
32.
Hull, Frank, Hage, Jerald and Azumi, Koya1981. `Strategies for innovation and productivity in American and Japan'. Technovation2:121-139.
33.
Hull, Frank, Hage, Jerald and Azumi, Koya1985. `R & D management strategies in the high technology era: America versus Japan'. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management78-83.
34.
Kaluzny, Arnold D., Veney, James E. and Gentry, John T.1974. `Innovation of health services: A comparative study of hospitals and health departments'. Health and Society52:51-82.
35.
Katz, Daniel and Kahn, Robert L. 1966. The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: Wiley.
36.
Kervasdoue, Jeanne 1973. `Efficiency and the adoption of innovations in format organizations'. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
37.
Kim, Linsu1980. `Organizational innovation and structure'. Journal of Business Research225-245.
38.
Kimberly, John R. and Evanisko, Michael J.1981. `Organization innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations'. Academy of Management Journal24:689-713.
39.
Lawrence, Paul R. and Lorsch, Jay W. 1967. Organization and Environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Litwak, Eugene1961. `Models of bureaucracy which permit conflict'. American Journal of Sociology59:177-184.
41.
March, James G. and Simon, Herbert A. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.
42.
McGregor, D. 1964. The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw Hill.
43.
Mintzberg, Henry 1979. The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
44.
Moritani, Masanori 1982. Japanese Technology. Tokyo: Simul Press.
45.
Ouchi, William G. 1981. Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
46.
Pelz, Donald C. and Andrews, Frank M. 1976. Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates of Research and Development. (Revised edition). Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Research.
47.
Peters, T. and Waterman, R. 1982. In Search of Excellence. New York: Harper.
48.
Perrow, Charles. 1967 `A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations'. American Sociological Review32:194-209.
49.
Pugh, D.S., Hickson, D.J., Hinings, C.R. and Turner, C.1969. `The context of organization structures'. Administrative Science Quarterly14:1-91.
50.
Scherer, Frederick 1970. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Chicago: Rand McNally.
51.
Scherer, Frederick 1981. R & D patenting, and the micro-structure of productivity growth'. Final Report, National Science Foundation (PRA 7826526).
52.
Schoonover, Claudia1981. Problems in the use of Contingency Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly126:349-377.
53.
Takeuchi, H. and Nonanka, Ikujiro 1986. `The New New Product Development Game'. Harvard Business Review. January - February 1986.
54.
Thompson, James D. 1967. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw Hill.
55.
Thompson, James D. 1979. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw Hill.
56.
Tosi, Henry and Carroll, Steve 1981. Management. New York: Wiley.
57.
Tushman, Michael L.1979. `Managing communication networks in R & D laboratories'. Sloan Management Review20:37-49.
58.
Tushman, M.L. and Scanlan, T.1981. `Characteristics and external orientations of boundary-spanning individuals'. Academy of Management Journal24:83-98.
59.
Utterback, James1971. `The process of technological innovation within the firm'. Academy of Management Journal14:75-88.
60.
Utterback, James1974. `Innovation in industry and diffusion of technology'. Science187:658-662.
61.
Van den Ven, Andrew, Delbecq, Andre and Koenig, Richard1976. `Determinants of coordination: modes within organizations'. American Sociological Review41:322-338.
62.
Weber, Max 1958. From Max Weber. T.C.W. Mills and H.H. Gerth. New York: Oxford University Press.
63.
Woodward, Joan 1965. Industrial Organizations: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
