This paper attempts to develop a framework through which the location of women in the occupational structure can be `thought through'. It is argued that approaches which derive their inspiration from class theories (of various types) have not been particularly successful. The Weberian concept of `status', it is suggested, may be more useful in understanding the employment position of women. However, Weber's original formulation of the status concept contains a number of ambiguities which may be rendered less problematic by thinking of `status' as a quality located in a matrix which has several dimensions, rather than in emphasising particular aspects of the `status' concept to the virtual exclusion of the others. Finally, these arguments are applied to the discussion of a small but significant section of the labour force - the professions. This task is of considerable contemporary interest given the recent, and considerable, increase in the proportion of women gaining `professional' qualifications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bailey, F. 1957. Caste and the Economic Frontier. Manchester University Press, Manchester.
2.
Barbalet, J.M.1982. `Social closure in class analysis: a critique of Parkin'. Sociology16: 484-497.
3.
Becker, H.S. 1970. `The nature of a profession' in H.S. Becker. Sociological Work. Chicago: Aldine.
Braverman, H. 1974. Labor and Monopoly CapitalNew York: Monthly Review Press.
6.
Child, J., Fores, M., Glover, I. and Lawrence, P.1983. `A price to pay? Professionalism and Work Organisation in Britain and West Germany'. Sociology17: 63-78.
7.
Chiplin, B., and Sloane, P.J. 1982. Tackling Discrimination at the Workplace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Cockburn, C. 1986. `The Relations of Technology' in R. Crompton and M. Mann (eds.), q.v.
Collins, R.1971. `Functional and conflict theories of educational stratification'. American Sociological Review36: 1002-1019.
11.
Collins, R. 1979. The Credential Society. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press.
12.
Crompton, R. and Jones, G. 1984. White-Collar Proletariat: Deskilling and Gender in the Clerical Labour Process. London: Macmillan.
13.
Crompton, R.1987. `Gender and Accountancy'Accounting, Organization and Society12: 103-110.
14.
Crompton, R. and Mann, M. (eds.) 1986. Gender and Stratification. Cambridge: Polity Press.
15.
Crompton, R. and Sanderson, K.1986. `Credentials and careers: some implications of the increase in professional qualifications amongst women'. Sociology20: 25-42.
16.
Delphy, C. 1977. `The main enemy: a materialist analysis of women's oppression'. Explorations in Feminism. No 3 (London: Women's Research and Resources Centre).
17.
Dingwall, R. and Lewis, P. (eds.) 1983. The Sociology of the Professions. London: Macmillan.
18.
Friedman, A.1976. `Responsible autonomy versus direct control over the labour process'. Capital and Class. 1: 43-57.
19.
Gerth, H. and Mills, C.W. (eds.) 1948. From Max Weber. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
20.
Goldthorpe, J.H.1983. “Women and class analysis: in defence of the conventional view”. Sociology17: 465-488.
21.
Gough, I. 1979. The Political Economy of the Welfare State. London: Macmillan.
22.
Hartmann, H. 1979. `Capitalism, patriarchy, and job segregation by sex' in Z. Eisenstein (ed.). Capitalist Patriarchy and the case for Socialist Feminism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
23.
Hartmann, H.I. 1981. `The unhappy marriage of Marxism and feminism: towards a more progressive union' in L. Sargent (ed.). Women and Revolution. Boston: South End Press.
24.
Holmwood, J.M. and Stewart, A.1983. `The role of contradictions in modern theories of social stratification'. Sociology17: 234-254.
25.
Imray, L. and Gamarnikow, E.et al. (eds.) The Public and the PrivateLondon: Heinemann.
26.
Johnson, T.J. 1972. Professions and Power. London: Macmillan.
27.
Johnson, T.`The professions in the class structure' in Industrial Society: Class, Cleavage and Control. (ed.) R. Scase, London: Allen and Unwin.
28.
Kanter, R.M. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
29.
Lenski, G. 1966. Power and Privilege. New York: Harper and Row.
30.
Marshall, G., Rose, D., Vogler, C. and Newby, H.1985. `Class, citizenship and distributional conflict in modern Britain'. British Journal of Sociology: 259-284.
31.
Marshall 1951. `Citizenship and social class' in T.H. Marshall. Sociology at the Crossroads. Tavistock, London.
32.
Meillassoux, C.1973. “Are there castes in India?Economy and Society. 2: 89-111.
33.
Milkman, R.1983. “Female factory labour and industrial structure: control and conflict over `women's place' in auto and electrical manufacturing”. Politics and Society. 12: 159-203.
Moorhouse, H.R. 1986. `Class or status: consumption issues in stratification research'. Paper given to Stratification Seminar, Cambridge, September.
36.
Murgatroyd, L.1982. `Gender and occupational stratification'. Sociological Review. 30: 574-602.
37.
Murphy, R.1984. `The structure of closure: a critique and development of the theories of Weber, Collins and Parkin'. British Journal of Sociology. 35: 547-567.
38.
Murphy, R.1986. `The concept of class in closure theory'. Sociology20: 247-264.
39.
Parkin, F. (ed.) 1974. The Social Analysis of Class Structure. London: Tavistock.
40.
Parkin, F. 1979. Marxism and Class TheoryLondon: Tavistock.
41.
Parsons, T. 1947. `Introduction' in Weber, M. The Theory of Social and Economic OrganizationNew York: Oxford University Press.
42.
Phillips, A. and Taylor, B.1980. `Sex and Skill: notes towards a feminist economics'Feminist Review6: 79-88.
43.
Polanyi, K. 1957. The Great TransformationBoston: Beacon Press.
44.
Poulantzas, N. 1975. Classes in Contemporary CapitalismLondon: New Left Books.
45.
Rex, J. 1971. Race Relations in Sociological Theory. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
46.
Rueschemeyer, D. 1986. Power and the Division of LabourCambridge: Polity Press.
47.
Scott, A. 1986. `Industrialization, gender segregation, and stratification theory' in R. Crompton and M. Mann (ed.) q.v.
48.
Simpson, R.L. and Simpson, I.H. 1969. `Women and bureaucracy in the semi-professions' in A. Etzioni (ed.) The Semi-Professions. New York: The Free Press.
49.
Stacey, M. 1981. `The division of labour revisited or overcoming the two Adams' in Practice and Progress: British Sociology 1950 - 1980 ed. P. Abramset al.London: Allen and Unwin.
50.
Tranter, N.L. 1985. Population and Society 1750 - 1940. London and New York: Longman.
51.
Walby, S. 1986. `Gender, class and stratification: towards a new approach' in R. Crompton and M. Mann (ed.) q.v.
