Comparisons between the offences, or other characteristics, of male and female offenders given particular disposals can lead to unjustified conclusions if the data are examined without reference to the wider context of the characteristics of all offenders convicted. Two studies are discussed in which unjustified conclusions are drawn.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ditchfield, J.A. (1976) Police Cautioning in England and WalesHome Office Research Unit, Study No.37 HMSO.
2.
Farrington D.P. and Morris A. (1983) `Sex, sentencing and reconviction.'Brit. J. Criminology, 22, 63-75.
3.
Home Office (1979) Criminal Statistics, England and Wales 1978, HMSO Cmnd. 7670.
4.
Landau, S.F. and Nathan, G. (1983) `Selecting delinquents for cautioning in the London Metropolitan Area,'Brit. J. Criminology, 23, 128-149.
5.
Mawby, R.I. (1977) `Sexual Discrimination and the Law', Probation Journal, 38-43.
6.
Webb, D. (1984) `More on Gender and Justice: Girl Offenders on Supervision.'Sociology, 18, 367-381.