Bell, C., and Newby, H. (eds.) (1977). Doing Sociological Research, London: George Allen and Unwin.
2.
Bottomore, T. & Nisbet, R. (eds.) (1978). A History of Sociological Analysis, London: Heinemann.
3.
Bryant, Christopher G. (1976). Sociology in Action: A Critique of Selected Conceptions of the Social Role of the Sociologist, London: George Allen and Unwin.
4.
Burrell, G. & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, London: Heinemann.
5.
Carey, J. T. (1975). Sociology and Public Affairs: The Chicago School, Beverley Hills: Sage.
6.
Cox, D. (1979). `Review of Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Gibson Burrell and Gareth Morgan', Reviewing Sociology, 1, 3-5.
7.
Effrat, A. (1973). `Power to the Paradigm: an editorial introduction', Sociological Inquiry, 3, 33.
8.
Eisenstadt, S. N. & Cureleu, M. (1976). The Form of Sociology: Paradigms and Crises, New York: Wiley.
9.
Friedrichs, Robert (1970). A Sociology of Sociology, New York: Free Press.
10.
`Reflections on My Critics', Lakatos & Musgrave (1970). (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 2nd edn. enlarged (inc. Postscript), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. (1970). Criticism and The Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Martins, H. (1972). `The Kuhnian “Revolution” and its Implications for Sociology' in Nossiter T. J. (ed.) Imagination and Precision in the Social Sciences: Essays in Memory of Peter Nett. London: Faber.
13.
Masterman, M. (1970). `The Nature of a Paradigm' in Lakatos & Musgrave (1970).
14.
Nisbet, R. (1976). Sociology As An Art Form, London: Heinemann. (An article with the same title first published in Pacific Sociological Review, 1962).
15.
Perry, N. (1977). `A Comparative Analysis of “paradigm” proliferation', British Journal of Sociology, 28, 38-50.
16.
Radnitzky, G. (1973) Contemporary Schools of Metascience (3rd edn.), Chicago: Regnery.
17.
Ritzer, G. (1975). `Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science', The American Sociologist, 10, 156-157.
18.
Achinstein, P. and Barker, S. (1969). The Legacy of Logical Positivism, Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Press.
19.
Agassi, J. (1963). Towards an Historiography of Science, History and Theory, Beiheft 2, The Hague.
20.
Agassi, J. (1979). `The Legacy of Lakatos', Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 9, 316-329.
21.
Albrow, M. (1974). `Dialectical and Categorical Paradigms of a Science of Society', Sociological Review, 22, 183-201.
22.
Amsterdamski, S. (1975). Between Science and Metaphysics, Dordrecht: Reidel.
23.
Bandyopadhyav, P. (1971). `One Sociology or Many: Some Issues in Radical Sociology', Sociological Review, 19, 5-30.
24.
Barber, B. (1961). `Resistance by Scientists to Scientific Discovery', Science, 134, 596-602.
25.
Barber, B. and Fox, R. C. (1958). `The Case of the Floppy-Eared Rabbits: An Instance of Serendipity Gained and Serendipity Lost', American Journal of Sociology, 54, 128-136.
26.
Barber and Hirsch W. (eds.) (1962). The Sociology of Science, New York: Free Press.
27.
Barbour, I. G. (1974). Myths, Models and Paradigms, London: S.C.M. Press.
28.
Bar-Hillel, Y. (ed.) (1975). Proceedings of the 1964 Congress for Logic, Methodology and the Philosophy of Science, Amsterdam: North Holland.
29.
Barnes, B. (1974). Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
30.
Barnes, B. (1972). Sociology of Science, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
31.
Baumrin, B. (ed.) (1963). Philosophy of Science: The Delaware Seminar, Vols. I & II. Vol. I New York: Wiley; Vol. II New York: Interscience.
32.
Beaver, Donald Dob (1979). `Possible Relationships Between the History and Sociology of Science', Sociological Inquiry, 48, 140-161.
33.
Beer, A. and Strand, K. (eds.) (1975). Copernicanism Yesterday and Today, New York: Pergamon.
34.
Bellman, B. L. and Bennetta, J. (eds.) (1977). Paradigm for looking: cross cultural research with visual media, Aldex Publishers.
35.
Ben-David, J. (1964). `Scientific Growth: A Sociological View', Minerva, II, 455-476.
36.
Ben-David, J. and Clark T. N. (eds.) (1975). Culture and its Creators: Essays in Honour of Edward Shils, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Ben-David, J. and Collins, R. (1966), `Social Factors in the Origins of a New Science: The Case of Psychology', American Sociological Review, 31, 451-465.
38.
Bernstein, Richard J. (1976). Restructuring of Social and Political Theory, New York: Harcourt Brace Janovich.
39.
Bhasker, Roy (1975). `Feyerabend & Bachelard: Two Philosophies of Science', New Left Review, 94, 31-55.
40.
Bloor, D. (1971). `Two Paradigms of Scientific Knowledge', Science Studies, 1, 101-115.
41.
Bloor, D. (1974). `Popper's Mystification of Objective Knowledge', Science Studies, 4, 65-76.
42.
Bloor, D. (1975), `Psychology or Epistemology?', Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 5, 382-395.
43.
Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge & Social Imagery, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, Direct Editions.
44.
Blume, Stuart S. (1977). Perspectives in the Sociology of Science, London: Wiley.
45.
Bromberger, S. (1963). `A Theory about the Theory of Theory and about the Theory of Theories', 79-106 in Baumrin (1963).
46.
Bryant, C. G. A. (1975). `Kuhn, Paradigms and Sociology', British Journal of Sociology, 26, 354-359.
47.
Buck, R. C. and Cohen, R. S. (eds.) (1971) P.S.A. 1970. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Boston: Reidel.
48.
Bunge, M. (ed.) (1964). The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Karl Popper, Glencoe: Free Press.
49.
Bunge, M. (1968a). `The Maturation of Science', in Lakatos and Musgrave (1968).
50.
Capek, M. (1971). Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. VII, Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
51.
Chalmers, A. F. (1978). What is this thing called Science?, Milton Keynes: Open University Press. First published in 1976, University of Queensland Press.
52.
Chisholm, R. and Swartz, R. (eds.) (1974). Empirical Knowledge, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
53.
Clagett, M. (ed.) (1957). Critical Problems in the History of Science.
54.
Coats, A. W. (1969). `Is There a Structure of Scientific Revolutions in Economics?', Kyklos, 22, 289-295.
55.
Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. (eds.) (1965). Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2, New York: Humanities Press.
56.
Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. (eds.) (1967). In Memory of N. R. Harrison, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3, Dordrecht: Reidel.
57.
Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsy, M. (eds.) (1969), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV, Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
58.
Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. (eds.) (1969a). Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. V, Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
59.
Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. (eds.) (1970). Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. VI, Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
60.
Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. (eds.) (1974). `Logical and Epistemological Studies in Contemporary Physics', Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. XIII, Boston: Kluwer.
61.
Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. (eds.) (1974a). `Methodological and Historical Essays in the Natural and Social Sciences', Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. XIV, Dordrecht: Reidel.
62.
Cohen, R. S., Feyerabend, P. K. and Wartofsky, M. W. (eds.) (1977). Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science Imre Lakatos Memorial Volume, Dordrecht: Reidel.
63.
Colodny, R. (ed.) (1962). Frontiers of Science and Philosophy, Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.
64.
Colodny, R. (ed.) (1965). Beyond the Edge of Certainty, Englewood Ciffs: Prentice Hall.
65.
Colodny, R. (ed.) (1966). Mind and Cosmos: Explorations in the Philosophy of Science, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
66.
Colodny, R. (ed.) (1970). The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories, Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.
67.
Colodny, R. (ed.) (1972). Paradigms and Paradoxes: The Philosophical Challenge of the Quantum Domain, Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.
68.
Crane, D. (1972). Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge In Scientific Communities, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69.
Crombie, A. C. (ed.) (1962). Scientific Change, London.
70.
Cullen and Cullen (1974). Toward a Paradigm of Labelling Theory.
71.
Davy, J. (1968). `Exploding the Science Myth: Review of J. D. Watson, “The Double Helix” ', The Observer, 19th May, 1968.
72.
Colin Dean (1977). `Are Serediptous Discoveries a Part of Normal Science? The case of the Pulsars', Sociological Review25, 73-86.
73.
Eckberg, Douglas Lee and Hill, Lester (1979). `The pardigm concept and Sociology, a Critical Review', American Sociological Review, 44, 925-937.
74.
Elkana, Y. (1973). The Discovery of the Conservation of Energy, London: Hutchinson.
75.
Feigl, H. (1970). `The “Orthodox” View of Theories: Remarks in Defense as Well as Critique', in Radner and Winokur (1970), 3-16.
76.
Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds.) (1961). Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science, New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
77.
Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (1962). Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. III, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
78.
Feigl, H. and Scriven, M. (eds.) (1956). Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. I (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
79.
Feigl, H., Scriven, M. and Maxwell, G. (eds.) (1956). Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. II, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
80.
Feyerabend, P. (1958). `An attempt at a Realistic Interpretation of Experience', Proceedings of the Aristotlian Society, new series 58, 143-170.
81.
Feyerabend, P. (1960). `Professor Bohm's Philosophy of Nature', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 10, 321-338.
82.
Feyerabend, P. (1962). `Explanation, Re-education and Empiricism', in Feigl and Maxwell (eds.) (1962), 28-97.
83.
Feyerabend, P. (1962a). Knowledge without Foundations, Oberlin: Oberlin College.
84.
Feyerabend, P. (1962b). `Problems of Microphysics', in Colodny (ed.) (1962), 189-283.
85.
Feyerabend, P. (1963a). `How to be a Good Empiricist - A Plea for Tolerance in Matters Epistemological', in Baumrin (ed.) (1963), Vol. II, 3-40. Reprinted in Nidditch (ed.) (1968).
86.
Feyerabend, P. (1963b). `Review of Hanson (1963)', Philosophical Review, 73, 264-266.
87.
Feyerabend, P. (1964). `Realism and Instrumentation: Commentary on the Logic of Factual Support', in M. Bunge (ed.) (1964), 280-308.
88.
Feyerabend, P. (1965a). `Reply to Criticism', in Cohen and Wartofsky (eds.) (1965), 223-261.
89.
Feyerabend, P. (1965b). `Problems of Empiricism', in Colodny (ed.): 1965, 145-260.
90.
Feyerabend, P. (1965c). `On the Meaning of Scientific Terms', Journal of Philosophy, 62, 266-274.
91.
Feyerabend, P. (1966). `Quantum Theory and Dialectical Materialism', Slavic Review, September 1966.
92.
Feyerabend, P. (1967a). `Law and Psychology in Conflict', Inquiry, 10, 114-120.
93.
Feyerabend, P. (1967b). `On the Improvement of the Sciences and the Arts and the Possible Identity of the Two', in Cohen and Wartofsky (eds.) (1967).
94.
Feyerabend, P. (1968-9). `On a Recent Critique of Complementarity', Philosophy of Science, 35, 309-331 and 36, 82-105.
95.
Feyerabend, P. (1969a). `A Note on Two Problems of Induction', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 19, 251-253.
96.
Feyerabend, P. (1969b). `Linguistic Arguments and Scientific Method', Telos, 3, 43-63.
97.
Feyerabend, P. (1970a). `Consolations for the Specialist', in Lakatos and Musgrave (1970) (Completed 1969).
98.
Feyerabend, P. (1970b). `Classical Empiricism', in Butts (ed.), The Methodological Heritage of Newton, 1970.
99.
Feyerabend, P. (1970c). `Against Method', in Radner & Winokur (es.) (1970).
100.
Feyerabend, P. (1970d). `Philosophy of Science: A Subject with a Great Past', Historical & Philosophical Perspectives of Science; Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5, R. Stuewer (ed.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
101.
Feyerabend, P. (1970e), Problems of Empiricism, pt. II, in R. Colodny (ed.), 1970, 275 ff.
102.
Feyerabend, P. (1972). Against Method, London: New Left Books. 1970, Verso paperback.
103.
Feyerabend, P. (1975), `How to Defend Society Against Science', Radical Philosophy, 2, 3-8.
104.
Feyerabend, P. (1965b), `On the Critique of Scientific Reason', in Howson (ed.) (1975), 309-339.
105.
Feyerabend, P. (1975b). `Imre Lakatos', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 26, 1-18.
106.
Feyerabend, P. and Maxwell, G. (eds.) (1966). Mind, Matter and Method, Essays in honour of H. Feigl, Minneaplis: University of Minnesota Press.
107.
Fisher, C. S. (1966). `The Death of Mathematical Theory: A Study in the Sociology of Knowledge', Archives for History of Exact Sciences, 3, 137-259.
108.
Ford, J. (1975). Paradigms and Fairytales: An Introduction to the Science of Meanings, 2 vols., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
109.
Frankel, H. (1979). `The Career of Continental drift theory: An application of Imre Lakatos, analysis of scientific growth to the use of drift theory', Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 10, 21-66.
110.
Frankenburg, R. (1970). `Social Prerequisisites of the Development of Science, Kuhnian Paradigms, Chinese Parallels and African Prospects', Paper presented at the 7th World Congress, Varna, 1970.
111.
Freidham, E. (1979). `An empirical comparison of Ritzer's paradigms and similar metatheories: A Research Note, Social Forces, 58, 59-66.
112.
Freudenthal, G. (1979). `How Strong is Dr. Bloor's “Strong Programme”?', Studies in History & Philosophy of Science, 10, 67-83.
113.
Friedrichs, R. (1970). A Sociology of Sociology, New York: Free Press.
114.
Gellner, E. (1968). `The New Idealism - Cause and Meaning in the Social Sciences', in Lakatos and Musgrave (eds.) (1968), 337-406.
115.
Gelwick, R. (1978). The Way of Discovery; An Introduction to the thought of Michael Polanyi, New York: Oxford University Press.
116.
Georgiou, P. (1973). `The Goal Paradigm and Notes towards a Counter Paradigm', Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 291-310.
117.
Gerhardt, U. (1979). `The Parsonian Paradigm and the Identity of Medical Sociology', The Sociological Review, 27, 229-252.
118.
Giedymin, J. (1971). `Consolations for the Irrationalist?', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 22, 28-48.
119.
Goldman, S. L. (1975). `Alender Kojeve on the Origin of Modern Science: Sociological Modelling Gone Awry', Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 6, 113-124.
120.
De Grazia, A., et al. (1966). The Velikovsky Affair, New York: University Books.
121.
Griffith, B. C. and Miller, A. J. (1970). `Networks of Informal Communication among Scientifically Productive Scientists', in Nelson & Pollock (eds.) (1970).
122.
Griffith, B. C. and Mullins, N. C. (1972). `Coherent Groups in Scientific Change: “Invisible Colleges” may be constant throughout Science', Science, 177, 959-964.
123.
Grumm (1973). Paradigm for the Comparative Analysis of Legislative Systems, Chicago: Sage.
124.
Grunbaum, A. (1976). `Is The Method of Bold Conjectures and Attempted Refutations Justifiably the method of Science?, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 27.
125.
Hall, R. J. (1970). `Kuhn and the Copernican Revolution', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 27, 105-136.
126.
Hall, R. J. (1971). `Can we use the history of science to decide between competing methodologies?', in Buck & Cohen (eds.) (1971).
127.
Hands, D. W. (1979). `The methodology of economic research programmes', Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 9, 293-303.
128.
Hanson, N. R. (1961). 'Is There a Logic of Scientific Discovery?', in Feigl and Maxwell (1961), 20-35.
129.
Hanson, N. R. (1971a). Observation and Explanation: A Guide to Philosophy of Science, New York: Harper and Row.
130.
Heilbron and Kuhn (1969). `The Genesis of the Bohr Atom', Historical Studies in The Physical Sciences, I, 211-290.
131.
Hempel, C. (1969). `On the Structure of Scientific Theories', 11-38 in the Isenberg Memorial Lecture Series, 1965-66, East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
132.
Hempel, C. (1970). `On the “Standard Conception” of Scientific Theories', 142-163 in Radner and Winokur (1970).
133.
Herbst, J. (1965). The German Historical School in American Scholarship: A Study of the Transfer of Culture, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornwell University Press.
134.
Hesse, M. (1970). `Hermeticism and Historiography: An Apology for Internal History of Science', 134-160 in Stuewer (1970).
135.
Hesse, M. (1974). The Structure of Scientific Inference, Berkeley: University of California Press.
136.
Holton, G. (1952). Introduction to Concepts and Theories in Physical Science, Cambridge: Addison-Wesley. (Rev. edn. 1973.)
137.
Holton, G. (1964a). `On the Thematic Analysis of Science: The Case of Poincare and Relativity', in Koyre (ed.) (1964), Vol. II, 257-268.
138.
Holton, G. (ed.) (1965). Science & Culture: A Study of Cohesive & Disjunctive Forces, Boston: Houghton Mifflin. (Re-issued 1967, Boston: Beacon.)
139.
Holton, G. (1967). `Science and New Styles of Thought', The Graduate Journal, 7, 339-442.
140.
Holton, G. (1970). `The Roots of Complementarity', Daedalus, Fall, 1015-1055.
141.
Holton, G. (1973). Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought, Kepler to Einstein, Cambridge, Mass.: Havard University Press. (Collection of his earlier essays.)
142.
Holton, G. (1975). `Thematic Analysis in Science', in Science, 188, p. 328 ff.
143.
Holton, G. (1978). The Scientific Imagination: Case Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
144.
Holton, G. and Blanpied, W. A. (eds.) (1976). `Science and its Public: The Changing Relationship', Boston Studies in The Philosophy of Science, 33, Boston: Reidel.
145.
Howson, C. (ed.) (1975). Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
146.
and Dudley Shapere's`Galileo: A Philosophical Study', Systematic Zoology, 24, 395-401.
147.
Humphreys, W. C. (1968). Anomalies and Scientific Theories, San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper.
148.
Hurley, Sir Andrew (1977). `Evidence, Clues and Motives in Science', New Humanist, 93, 61-66.
149.
Kemp, R. (1977). `Controversy in Scientific Research and Tactics in Communication', Sociological Review, 25, 515-534.
150.
Kerrine, T. M. and Neuhaus, R. J. (1979). `Mediating Structures: A Paradigm for Democratic Pluralism', Annals of Soc. Science, 10-18.
151.
Kessel, F. S. (1969). `The Philosophy of Science as Proclaimed and Science as Practiced: “Identity” or “Dualism?” ', American Psychologist, 24, 999-1005.
152.
King, P. and Parekh, B. C. (eds.) (1968). Politics and Experience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
153.
Kleiner, S. A. (1979). `Feyerabend, Galileo & Darwin: How to make the best out of what you have, or think you can get', Studies in History & Philosophy of Science (Dec.), 285-309.
154.
Kordig, C. R. (1970). `Feyerabend and Radical Meaning Variance', Nous, 9, 399-404.
155.
Koyre, M. A. (ed.) (1964). Publie's A' L'Occasion de Son Soixante Dixieme Anniversaire, Paris: Hermann.
156.
Kucklick, H. (1973). `A Scientific Revolution: Sociological Theory in The United States, 1930-1945', Sociological Inquiry, 43, 3-22.
157.
Kuhn, T. S. (1957a). The Copernican Revolution, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Re-issued: Random House, 1959.)
158.
Kuhn, T. S. (1957b). `Energy Conservation as an Example of Simultaneous Discovery', in M. Clagett (ed.) (1957), 321-356.
159.
reprinted in Barnes (1972), 80-104. Read at Oxford in 1961, written after Kuhn (1962b).
160.
Kuhn, T. S. (1961b). `The Function of Measurement in Modern Physical Science', Isis, 52, 161-193. Reprinted in Woolf (ed.) (1961), 31-63.
161.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962a). `The Historical Structure of Scientific Discovery', Science, 136, 760-764.
162.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962b). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: `International Encyclopaedia of United Science', Vol. II, no. 2: University of Chicago Press.
163.
Kuhn, T. S. (1963). `The Essential Tension: Tradition and Innovation in Scientific Research', in Taylor & Barron (eds.) (1963), 341-354. (Paper first published in 1959.)
164.
Kuhn, T. S. (1965). `Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research', in Lakatos & Musgrave (1970), 1-24.
165.
Kuhn, T. S. (1968). `Science: The History of Science', in D. L. Sills (ed.), International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 14, 74-83.
166.
Kuhn, T. S. (1969a). `Reflections on My Critics', in Lakatos & Musgrave (1970), 231-278.
167.
Kuhn, T. S. (1969b). `Comment' (on the relation between Science and Art), Comparative Studies in Society & History, 11.
168.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., enlarged (inc. Postscript), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
169.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). `Second Thoughts on Paradigms', in Suppe (ed.) (1970).
170.
Kuhn, T. S. (1971). `Notes on Lakatos', in Buck & Cohen (eds.) (1971), 137-146.
171.
Lakatos, I. (1962). `Infinite Regress and the Foundations of Mathematics', Aristotelian Society Supplementary, Vol. 36, 155-184.
172.
Lakatos, I. (1963-4). `Proofs & Refutations', The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science14, 1-25, 120-139, 221-243, 296-342.
173.
Lakatos, I. (1966). `Popkin on Skepticism', in W. Yourgrau and A. D. Breck (eds.), Logic, Physics & History (1970), 220-223.
174.
Lakatos, I. (1967). `A Renaissance of Empiricism in the Recent Philosophy of Mathematics', in I. Lakatos (ed.), Problems in the Philosophy of Mathematics, 199-202.
175.
Lakatos. I. (1968a). `Changes in the Problem of Inductive Logic', in I. Lakatos (ed.) (1968), 315-417.
176.
Lakatos, I. (1968b). `Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society69, 149-186.
177.
Lakatos, I. (1968c) (ed.). The Problem of Inductive Logic, Amsterdam: North Holland.
178.
Lakatos, I. (1970). `Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes', in Lakatos & Musgrave (1970, 91-196. (Completed in 1969.)
179.
Lakatos, I. (1971). `History of Science and its Rational Reconstructions', in Buck & Cohen (eds.) (1971), 91-136. Reprinted in Howson (ed.) (1975), 1.
180.
Lakatos, I. (1971b). `Replies to Critics', in Buck & Cohen (eds.) (1971).
181.
Lakatos, I. (1974a). `Popper on Demarcation and Induction', in P. A. Schilpp (ed.) (1974). Originally in German in 1971.
182.
Lakatos, I. (1974b). `The Role of Crucial Experiments in Science', Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science4, 309-325.
183.
Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.) (1968). Problems in the Philosophy of Science, Amsterdam: North Holland.
184.
Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.) (1970). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
185.
Lakatos, I. and Zahar, E. (eds.) (1968). `Why did Copernicus's Research Programme Supersede Ptolemy's?, in R. Westman (ed.), The Copernican Achievement, California University Press.
186.
Law, J. and Barnes, B. (1976). `Areas of Ignorance in Normal Science: A Note on Mulkay's Three Models of Scientific Development', Sociological Review, 24, 115-124.
187.
Leinfellner, W. and Kohler, E. (eds.) (1974). Developments in the Methodology of Social Science, Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
188.
Lesher, J. H. (1978). `On the Role of Guesswork in Science', Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 9, 19-33.
189.
Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
190.
Liebert, R. and Immershein, A. (eds.) (1977). Power Paradigms and Community Research, New York: Sage.
191.
Luckhardt, C. G. (1978). `Beyond Knowledge: Paradigms in Wittgenstein's later Philosophy', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 39, 240-252.
192.
Lugg, A. (1978). `Overdetermined Problems in Science', Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 9, 1-18.
193.
Marcson, S. (1979). `The autonomy of Scientists', British Journal of Sociology, 30, 120-124.
194.
Martin, R. J. (1974). `Cultic Aspects of Sociology: A Speculative Essay', British Journal of Sociology, 25, 15-31.
195.
Martins, H. (1972). `The “Kuhnian” Revolution and its implications for Sociology', in T. J. Nossiter (ed.), Imagination and Precision in the Social Sciences. Essays in Memory of Peter Net, London: Faber.
196.
Maull, N. L. (1976). `Reconstructed Science as Philosophical Evidence', in Suppe & Asquith, (eds.) (1976), 119-129.
197.
Merton, R. K. (1961). Singletons and Multiples in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science.
198.
Merton, R. K. (1973). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
199.
Merton, R. K. (1975). `Thematic Analysis in Science: Notes on Holton's Concept', Science, 188, 335-338.
200.
Mulkay, M. J. (1972). The Social Process of Innovation: A Study in the Sociology of Science, London: Macmillan.
Mulkay, M. J. (1978). `Consensus in Science', Social Science Information, 17, 107-122.
203.
Mulkay, M. J., Gilbert, G. N. and Woolgar, S. (1975). `Problem Areas and Research Networks In Science', Sociology, 9, 187-203.
204.
Mulkay, M. J. and Turner, B. S. (1971). `Over Production of Personnel and Innovation in Three Social Settings', Sociology, 5, 47-61.
205.
Mullins, N. (1968). `The Social Origins of an Invisible College: the Phage Group'. Paper presented to the American Sociological Association meeting, Boston (August).
206.
Mullins, N. (1968a). `The distribution of social and cultural properties in informal communications networks among biological scientists', American Sociological Review, 33, 786-789.
207.
Mullins, N. (1972). `A model for the development of a scientific speciality: the Phage Group and the origins of molecular biology', Minerva, 10, 51-82.
208.
Mullins, N. (1973). Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology, New York: Harper & Row.
209.
Musgrave, A. E. (1971). `Kuhn's Second Thoughts', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 22, 287-297.
210.
Musgrave, A. E. (1974a). `Falsifications and Its Critics', in P. Suppe, et al. (eds.) (1974), 393-406.
211.
Musgrave, A. E. (1974b). `Logical Versus Historical Theories of Confirmation', Philosophy of Science, 25, 1-23.
212.
Musgrave, A. E. (1974c). `The Objectivism of Popper's Epistemology', in Schlipp (1974), 560-596.
213.
Musgrave, A. E. (1976). `Method or Madness?', in Cohen, Feverband, Wartofsky (eds.) (1977).
214.
Nelson, C. E. and Pollock, D. K. (1970). Communication among Scientists and Engineers, Lexington, Mass.: Heath-Lexington.
215.
Nidditch, P. H. (ed.) (1968). The Philosophy of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
216.
O'Brien, D. P. (1976). `The Longevity of Adam Smith's vision: Paradigms, Research Programmes and Falsifiability in the History of Economic Thought', Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 23, 133-151.
217.
Overington, M. A. (1979). `Doing What Comes Rationally: Some Developments in Metatheory', American Sociologist, 14, 2-34 (inc. comments and rejoinder).
218.
Parker, J. (1975). `Comment on “Three models of Scientific development by M. J. Mulkay” ', Sociological Review, 23, 527-533.
219.
Perry, N. (1977). `A Comparative Analysis of “Paradigm” Proliferation', British Journal of Sociology, 28, 38-50.
220.
Polanyi, M. (1967a). `Science and Reality', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 18, 177-196.
221.
Polanyi, M. (1967b). The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
222.
Polanyi, M. (1969). Knowing and Being, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
223.
Phillips, D. L. (1973a). Abandoning Method, San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
224.
Phillips, D. L. (1973b). `Paradigms, Falsification and Sociology', Acta Sociologica, 16, 13-31.
225.
Phillips, D. L. (1977). Wittgenstein and Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Perspective, Londn: Macmillan.
226.
Popper, K. R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson. Revised 1968 and 1972. Originally published in German 1934.
227.
Popper, K. R. (1963a). Open Society and its Enemies, 2 vols. including Addendum, New York: Harper Torch Books. (First printed 1945.)
228.
(incl. `What is Dialectic', Mind (1940), 49, 403-426).
229.
Popper, K. R. (1968). `On the Theory of Objective Mind', Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Philosophy I, 25-33.
230.
Popper, K. R. (1970). `Normal Science and its Dangers', in Lakatos & Musgrave (1970), 51-58. (Slightly amended version of paper read in July 1965.)
231.
Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
232.
Popper, K. R. (1974). `The Philosophy of Karl Popper', in Schlipp (1974).
233.
Price, D. J. (1963). Little Science, Big Science, New York: Columbia University Press.
234.
Price, D. J. (1965). `Networks of Scientific Papers: The Pattern of Bibliographic References Indicates the Nature of the Scientific Research Format', Science, 149, 510-515.
235.
Price, D. J. (1970). `Citation Measures of Hard Science, Soft Science, Technology and Non-Science', in Nelson & Pollock (eds.) (1970), 3-22.
236.
Price, D. J. and Beaver, D. de (1966). `Collaboration in an Invisible College', American Psychologist, 21, 1101-1118.
237.
Radnitzky, G. (1973). Contemporary Schools of Metascience, 3rd edn., Chicago: Regnery (Gateway edn.). First published 1968 by Scandinavian University Books: Akaden Forlager, Goteburg, Sweden.
238.
Radner, M. and Winokur, S. (eds.) (1970). Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
239.
Ritzer, G. (1975). `Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science', American Sociologist, 10, 156-167.
240.
Rock, P. (1976). `Some Problems of Interpretive Historiography', British Journal of Sociology, 27, 353-369.
241.
Schaffner, K. F. and Cohen, R. (1974). PSA 1972: Proceedings of the 1972 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. XX, Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
242.
Schlipp, P. (ed.) (1974). The Philosophy of Karl R. Popper, Lasalle, III: Open Court.
243.
Shapere, D. (1964). `The Structure of Scientific Revolutions', Philosophical Review, 73, 383-394.
244.
Shapere, D. (1966). `Meaning and Scientific Change', 41-85, in Colodny (1966).
245.
Shapere, D. (ed.) (1965). Philosophical Problems of Natural Science, New York: Macmillan.
246.
Shapere, D. (1971). `The Pardigm Concept', Science172, 706-709.
247.
Shapere, D. (1974d). `Discovery, Rationality, and Progress in Science: A Perspective in the Philosophy of Science', 407-419 in Schaffner and Cohen (1974).
248.
Shapere, D. (1975a). `Copernicanism as a Scientific Revolution', in A. Beer and K. Strand (eds.) (1975).
249.
Silver, B. B. (1978). `Comment on Melbin, ASR Feb. 1978. On the use of Historical Documents and Evidence', American Sociological Review, 43, 929-930.
250.
Smolica, J. S. (1971). `The Amorphous Paradigms', Politics, 6, 178-187.
251.
Stephens, J. (1973). `The Kuhnian Paradgm and Political Enquiry: an Appraisal', American Journal of Political Science, 17, 467-488.
252.
Stuewer, R. (1970). Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. V, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
253.
Suppe, F. (ed.) (1970). The Structure of Scientific Theories, Urbana; University of Illinois Press.
254.
Suppe, F. (1972b). `What's Wrong with Received View on the Structure on Scientific Theories?', Philosophy of Science, 39, 1-19.
255.
Suppe, F. and Asquith, P. (eds.) (1976). PSA 1976: Proceedings of the 1976 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. I, East Lansing, Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association.
256.
Suppe, F. and Asquith, P. (1977). PSA 1976: Proceedings of the 1976 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. II, East Lansing, Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association.
257.
Suppe, P., et al. (ed.) (1974). Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science IV, Amsterdam: North Holland.
258.
Taylor, C. W. and Baron, F. (eds.) (1963). Scientific Creativity: Its Recognition and Development, New York.
259.
Thornbohm, H. (1977). Paradigm Shift in Theories of Gravitation, Humanities Press: Papers in the Study of Science No. 6.
260.
Toulmin, S. (1972). Human Understanding, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
261.
Toulmin, S. (1974). `Science and Scientists: The Problems of Objectivity', Minerva, 12, 522-529. (Review of Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: G. Holton.)
262.
Townsend, B. (1971). `Feyerabend's Pragmatic Theory of Observation and the Comparability of Alternative Theories', 203-211, in Buck and Cohen (1971).
263.
Urry, J. (1973). `Thomas S. Kuhn as Sociologist of Knowledge', British Journal of Sociology, 24, 462-473.
264.
Wade, N. (1976). `Sociobiology: Troubled Birth for a New Discipline', Science, 191, 1151-1155.
265.
Wartofsky, M. W. (ed.) (1963). Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science I, Boston: Kluwer.
266.
Wartofsky, M. W. (ed.) (1968). Conceptual Foundations of Scientific Thought, New York: Macmillan.
267.
Watkins, J. W. N. (1970). `Against Normal Science', in Lakatos and Musgrave (eds.) (1970), 25-380.
268.
Williams, L. P. (1970). `Normal Science, Scientific Revolutions and the History of Science', in Lakatos & Musgrave (eds.) (1970), 49-50. (Read in July 1965.)
269.
Wilson, T. P. (1970). `Normative and Interpretive Paradigms in Sociology', in Douglas (ed.) (1970), 57-79.
270.
Wolin, S. (1969). `Paradigms and Political Theories', in King and Parekh (eds.), 125-152.
271.
Woolf, H. (ed.) (1964). Science as a Culture Force, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
