This paper reports findings from the Oxford Growth of Firms project on the ownership and control position of the largest 250 UK companies and, in more detail, that of a sample of 21 of these large firms. An analysis is made of the social and economic historical context in which most of today's large firms grew up. A theoretical model is developed of the stages of control through which firms are likely to pass. It is suggested that most firms are unlikely ever to become controlled by their own professional managers and that there is a trend towards firms being controlled by financial institutions. Evidence is then put forward, from an analysis of the current control position of the `top 250' UK firms and from brief histories of the 21 sample large firms, which supports the previously outlined theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ANDERSON, P. (1965). `Origins of the Present Crisis'. in Anderson, P. and Blackburn, R. (eds.), Towards Socialism, London: Fontana , 11-52.
2.
BERLE, A. A. and MEANS, G. C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York: Macmillan .
3.
BLACKBURN, R. (1972). `The New Capitalism' in Blackburn, R. (ed.), Ideology in Social Science, Fontana .
4.
CAIRNCROSS, A. K. (1953). Home and Foreign Investment 1870-1913, Cambridge University Press .
5.
CHANDLER, A. D. (1962). Strategy and Structure, M.I.T. Press .
6.
CHANDLER, A. D. (1977). The Visible Hand, Harvard .
7.
COLE, G. , Chairman of Unilever, in an interview with Kenneth Harris, The Observer, 6 and 13 January 1963.
8.
CORLEY, T. A. B. (1972). Quaker Enterprise in Biscuits: Huntley and Palmers of Reading 1822-1972, London: Hutchinson .
9.
CROUZET, F. (1962). `La formation du capital en Grande Bretagne pendant la revolution industrielle', quoted in Gould, 1972: 164.
10.
FITCH, R. and OPPENHEIMER, M. (1970). `Who Rules the Corporation' (in 3 parts), Socialist Revolution, 1, nos. 4, 5, 6.
11.
FITCH, R. (1970). `Reply to O'Connor', Socialist Revolution, 150-170.
12.
FRANCIS, A. Forthcoming. Company Objectives, Managerial Motivations and the Behaviour of Large Firms: an empirical test of the theory of `Managerial Capitalism'.
13.
FRANKO, L. G. (1974). `The Move Toward a Multidivisional Structure in European Organisations' , Admin. Sci. Qtly., 19, 4, 493-506 .
14.
GALBRAITH, J. K. (1967). The New Industrial State, London .
15.
GELATT, R. Undated. A Voice to Remember: the Sounds of 75 years on EMI Records, 1898-1973, EMI .
16.
GOULD,J. D. (1972). Economic Growth in History, London: Methuen .
17.
HAGEN, E. E. (1962). On the Theory of Social Change, Dorsey Press, Illinois .
18.
HALSEY, A. H. (ed.) (1972). Trends in British Society since 1900, Macmillan .
19.
HOBSBAWM, E. J. (1968). Industry and Empire, Harmondsworth: Penguin .
20.
JONES, R. and MARRIOTT, O. (1970). Anatomy of a Merger, London:Jonathan Cape .
21.
LARNER, R. J. (1966). `Ownership and control in the Largest Non-Financial Corporations, 1929 and 1963' , Amer. Econ. Review, LVI: 777-787 .
22.
LEVINE, J. H. (1972). `The Sphere of Influence , Amer. Soc. Rev., 37, 14-27 .
23.
MATHIAS, P. (1969). The First Industrial Nation: an economic history of Britain 1700-1914, London: Methuen .
24.
MUIR, A. (1968). The History of Baker Perkins, Cambridge: W. Heffer .
25.
N.E.D.O. (1975). Finance for Investment: A study of mechanisms available for financing industrial investment. HMSO .
26.
NICHOLS, T. (1969). Ownership, Control and Ideology. Allen and Unwin .
27.
NYMAN, S. and SILBERSTON, A. (1978). `The Ownership and Control of Industry' , Oxford Economic Papers, 30, 1, 74-103 .
28.
( PATMAN) STAFF REPORT . (1968). Commercial Banks and their Trust Activities: Emerging Influence on the American Economy, Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office .
29.
PERROW, C. (1970). Organisational Analysis, Tavistock .
30.
READER, W. J. (1975). ICI: A History, Vol. 2, `The First Quarter Century, 1926-1952'. Oxford University Press .
31.
REVELL, J. R. (1967). The Wealth of the Nation: The National Balance Sheet of the UK, 1957-1961. Cambridge University Press .
32.
SCOTT, J. D. (1962). Vickers: A history. Weidenfeld and Nicolson .
33.
SCOTT, J. and HUGHES, M. (1976). `Ownership and Control in a Satellite Economy: A Discussion from Scottish Data' , Sociology, 10.1.
34.
SCOTT, J. and HUGHES, M. (1980). `Capital and Communication in Scottish Business' , Sociology, 14.1.
35.
STANWORTH, P. and GIDDENS, A. (1975). `The Modern Corporate Economy: Interlocking Directorships in Britain, 1906-1970 , Soc. Review, 23, 5-28 .
36.
STONE, L. (1972). The Causes of the English Revolution 1529-1642. London .
37.
THRELFALL, R. E. (1951). The Story of 100 Years of Phosphorus Making, 1851-1951, Oldbury: Albright and Wilson .
38.
TURNER, R. (1960). Modes of Social Ascent Through Education: Sponsored and Contest Mobility . Amer Soc. Rev., XXV, 5 .
39.
WHITLEY, R. (1973). `Commonalities and Connections among directors of large financial institutions' , Soc. Review, 21, 613-632 .
40.
WILSON, C.The History of Unilever, in 3 vols., London: Cassel1954; vols. 1-2; 1958, vol. 3.
41.
WILSON, C. H. (1965). England's Apprenticeships: 1603-1763, London: Longmans .
42.
WILSON, C. (1977). `Management and Policy in Large-Scale Enterprise: Lever Brothers and Unilever, 1918-1938', in Barry Supple (ed.), Essays in British Business, Clarendon Press, Oxford .
43.
ZEITLIN, M. (1974). `Corporate Ownership and Control: The large corporations and the capitalist class , Amer. Jl. Soc., 79, 5, 1073-1119 .
