Relations Between Work Habits,Research Technologies,and Eminence in Science

Abstract

This paper examines relations between the work habits of academic scientists and measures of scholarly eminence and productivity. Data for 549 facult' members in three disciplines in U. S. universities are examined in order to test previous arguments on the topic. Results are presented which are consistent with the hypothesis that associations between work habits and scholarly output vary with the level of predictability or routine in research work. To the extent that this level is a consequence of the underlying pattern of social integration in a scientificfield, these results imply that an understanding of scientific creativity andproductivity presupposes an understanding of patterns of social integration in science.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BERELSON, B. (1960) Graduate Education in the United States. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill.

BLALOCK, H. M., Jr. (1972) Social Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

BOHRNSTEDT, G. W. and J. MARWELL (1975) "On the reliability of products of random variables." (unpublished)

EIDUSON, B. T. (1962) Scientists: Their Psychological World. New York: Basic Books.

GASTON, J. (1973) Originality and Competition in Science: a Study of the British High Energy Physics Community. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

GIOVACCHINI, P. L. (1960) "On scientific creativity." J. of the Amer. Psychoanalytic Association 8: 407-426.

HADAMARD, J. (1949) The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.

HAGSTROM, W. O. (1971) "Inputs, outputs, and the prestige of university science departments." Sociology of Education 44: 375-397.

HAGSTROM, W. O. (1964) "Traditional and modern forms of scientific teamwork." Admin. Sci. Q. 9: 241-263.

10.

HARGENS, L. L. (1975) Patterns of Scientific Research. Washington, DC: Amer. Sociological Association.

11.

KUHN, T. S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

12.

KUHN, T. S. (1963) "The essential tension: tradition and innovation in scientific research," in C. W. Taylor and F. Barron (eds.) Scientific Creativity: It's Recognition and Development. New York: John Wiley.

13.

LODAHL, J. B. and G. GORDON (1972) "The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments." Amer. Sociological R. 37: 57-72.

14.

MANIS, J. G. (1951) "Some academic influence upon publication productivity." Social Forces 29: 267-272.

15.

MERTON, R. K. (1968) "The Matthew Effect in science." Science 159 (January): 56-63.

16.

MERTON, R. K. (1967) Abstract of "The Matthew Effect in the rewarding and communication structure of science." Abstracts of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association: 98-98.

17.

PELZ, D. C. and F. M. ANDREWS (1966) Scientists in Organizations. New York: John Wiley.

18.

PERROW, C. (1967) "A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations." Amer. Sociological R. 32: 194-208.

19.

PRICE, D. J. (1963) Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.

20.

ROE, A. (1952) The Making of a Scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead.

21.

SIMON, R. J. (1974) "The work habits of eminent scientists." Sociology of Work and Occupations 1: 327-335.

22.

STINCHCOMBE, A. L. (1966) "On getting'hung-up' and other assorted illnesses." Johns Hopkins Magazine (Winter): 25-30.

23.

TAYLOR, C. W. (1964) Creativity: Progress and Potential. New York: McGraw-Hill.

24.

ZUCKERMAN, H. (1968) "Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: a study of social symbolism and its ambiguity." Amer. J. of Sociology 74: 276-291.

25.

ZUCKERMAN, H. (1967) "Nobel laureates in science: patterns of productivity, collaboration, and authorship." Amer. Sociological R. 32: 391-403.