9.Fleet Street papers either employ specialists court reporters to cover trials or, more usually, rely on general reporters and agency copy. In the case of a major trial, the crime reporter will not generally sit through the entire proceedings but may arrive in time for the verdicts, having already prepared a background piece, anticipating the outcome ('It's no good going too early because you get fogged by a mass of irrelevant information.') Court reporting as a specialization has been declining over the last decade and many of its leading practitioners have now retired—Charles Doherty, Arnold Latcham, etc. The Association of Central Criminal Court Journalists is an enclave of conservatism who members are prepared to resist challenges to their shared values, perceptions and understandings. Something of the character of the organization can be gleaned from its reaction to the Evening Standard's decision to ask underground journalist, Richard Neville, to cover the case of Regina vs. Prescott and Purdie in 1971. Part of its letter of protest to the Evening Standard's Editor reads: Our members are reporters of long experience in Fleet Street and elsewhere, who are justly proud of their reputation of providing responsible day-to-day coverage of trials at a place that the Lord Chancellor described last month as `... par excellence, the premier criminal court in the Commonwealth, and perhaps the world.' We object, therefore, to being identified... with a person who has a conviction for sending an obscene article, viz. Oz, No. 28, Schoolkids issue, through the post.... Our members feel that in these days of declining standards, our voice must be raised in the hope that eventually, with others, it will be heard. Compared with crime reporting, court reporting is highly structured, offering the journalist less scope for innovation, autonomy, source selection and exclusivity. This means that, while conflicts of interest are by no means absent, source relationships and the negotiation of accounts are less significant.