See Raymond Williams , The Long Revolution, London: Chatto and Windus , 1961, pp. 331-332.
2.
Times Higher Education Supplement, 26.10.73., P. 15,
3.
Times Literary Supplement, 26.IO.73., P. 1307.
4.
in Sociological Review, 20, 2, 1972, pp. 266-267 . Those who feel that this review of The Symmetrical Family is unduly hostile to Young and Willmott should refer to my review of Platt, where I outline their strengths and argue that her attacks were largely misdirected.
5.
In the Preface, no less than 97 named people are acknowledged for their advice and assistance, together with unnamed members of seminars and committees. There are 5! named interviewers, 14 coders and eight typists. In all this is considerably more than the damage samples' on which was based the bulk of Family and Kinship in East London, London: Routledge , 1957.
6.
Those who are tempted so to do should know that Young and Wilimott's data are at the SSRC Data Archive at the University of Essex.
7.
This argument is elaborated in Colin Bell and Howard Newby , `Husbands and Wives: the dynamics of the deferential dialectic' , a paper presented to the 1974 Conference of the B.S.A. Its fullest expression is to be found in Howard Newby, 1975. `The Deferential Dialectic', Comparative Studies of Society and History .
8.
Charlotte M. Yonge , Womankind, London: Walter Smith and Innes , 1889.
9.
Dorothy Crozier , `Kinship and occupational succession' , The Sociological Review, 13, I, pp. 15-43 .
10.
Raymond Firth , `Family and kinship in industrial society', Sociological Review, Monograph No. 8, pp. 65-87.
