Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Path analysis is too concerned with the observable and not concerned enough with the conceptual. Many path analyses are rendered trivial, and overly complicated by this emphasis. A method proposed by Hope (1971) within the framework of path analysis is shown to add its own further confusion, and to be invalid. The same data is analysed by two (differing) approaches which are less concerned with the observed and more concerned with what underlies the observed. Basic deductions from both methods (one is regression-based, the other factor analysis-based) are the same. One, the data armed by Hope contains much redundancy in conceptual terms: two, the underlying process is very simple: `A person's level of education is predicted (caused?) by his mental ability and type of parental home environment, with ability being a more important factor. Most systematic variation in a person's occupational prestige is "caused" by the person's level of education'.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BLALOCK H. M. 1964. Causal Inferences in Non-experimental Research, U. of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill .

BLALOCK H. M. 1969. Theory Construction, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs .

DUNCAN O. D. 1968. "Ability and achievement" , Eugenics Quarterly, 15(1): 1-11 .

EYSENCK H. H. 1953. "The logical basis of factor analysis" , American Psychologist, 8.

HARMAN H.H. 1966. Modern Factor Analysis, U. of Chicago Press, Chicago .

HOPE K. 1969. Methods of Multivariate Analysis, U. of London Press, London .

HOPE K. 1971. "Path analysis—Supplementary procedures" , Sociology, 5 (2), May: 225-241 .

JOHNSTON J. 1972. Econometric Methods, (2nd Edn), McGraw-Hill, New York .

KUHN T. S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, (2nd Edn), U. of Chicago Press, Chicago .

10.

LAWLEY D. N. and MAXWELL, A. E. 1971. Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method, (2nd Edn), Butterworths, London.

11.

LIPSEY R. G. 1966. An Introduction to Positive Economics, (1st Edn), Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London.

12.

MAPES R. E. A. and ALLAN G. J. B. 1973. "Path analysis—A cautionary note" , Sociological Review, 21 (1), Feb: 137-144 .

13.

MOOD A. 1971. "Partitioning variance as a tool for developing learning models" , American Educational; Research Journal, 8 (2), March: 191-202 .

14.

MORRISON D. F. 1967. Multivariate Statistical Methods, McGraw-Hill, New York.

15.

MULKAY M. J. 1971. Functionalism, Exchange and Theoretical Strategy, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

16.

PHILIPS A. W. 1958. "The relation between the rate of change of money wage rates and the level of unemployment in the U.K." , Economica, 25 (new series).

17.

ROSSETT R. N. 1971. "A weak experimental verification of the expected utility hypothesis" , Review of Economic Studies, 38: 481-492 .

18.

ROYCE J. R. 1963. "Factors as theoretical constructs" , American Psychologist, 18.

19.

SULLIVAN J. L. 1971. "Multiple indicators and complex causal models" in (ed. H. M. Blalock ) Causal Models in the Social Sciences, Macmillan, London.

20.

THEIL H. 1971. Principles of Econometrics, Wiley, New York.

21.

THURSTONE L. L. 1947. Multiple Factor Analysis, U. of Chicago Press, Chicago.

22.

TURNER, H. 1960. "Sponsored and contest mobility and the school system" , American Socological Review. 25(5).

23.

ZETTERBERG H. L. 1966. On Theory and Verification in Sociology, (3rd Edn) Bedminster Press, New Jersey.

Simplicity in Path Analysis

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References