This paper critically examines available theoretical models which have been derived from statistically established patterns of association between contextual and organizational variables. These models offer an interpretation of organizational structure as a product of primarily economic constraints which contextual variables are assumed to impose. It is argued that available models in fact attempt to explain organization at one remove by ignoring the essentially political process, whereby power-holders within organizations decide upon courses of strategic action. This `strategic choice' typically includes not only the establishment of structural forms but also the manipulation of environmental features and the choice of relevant performance standards. A theoretical re-orientation of this kind away from functional imperatives and towards a recognition of political action is developed and illustrated in the main body of the paper.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BAIN, J. S.1959. Industrial Organization, New York: Wiley .
2.
BLALOCK, H.1969. Theory Construction: From Verbal to Mathematical Formulations, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall .
3.
BLAU, P. M.1965. `The Comparative Study of Organizations' , Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 18, April: 323-338 .
4.
BLAU, P. M.et al.1966. `The Structure of Small Bureaucracies' , American Sociological Review, 31, April: 179-191 .
5.
BLAU, P. M.1970. `The Formal Theory of Differentiation in Organizations' , American Sociological Review, 35, April: 201-218 .
6.
BROOKE, M. Z. and REMMERS, H. L.1970. The Strategy of Multinational Enterprise, London: Longmans .
7.
BURNS, T. 1966a. Preface to second edition of Burns and Stalker (1961).
8.
BURNS, T.1966b. `On the Plurality of Social Systems', in J. R. Lawrence (ed), Operational Research and the Social Sciences, London: Tavistock , 165-177.
9.
BURNS, T. and STALKER, G. M.1961. The Management of Innovation, London: Tavistock .
10.
CAVES, R. E.et al.1968. Britain's Economic Prospects, London: Allen and Unwin .
11.
CHANDLER, A.1962. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise, Cambridge: M.I.T. Press .
12.
CHILD, J.1969. The Business Enterprise in Modern Industrial Society, London: Collier-Macmillan .
13.
CHILD, J.1970. `More Myths of Management Organization?'Journal of Management Studies, 7: 376-390 .
14.
CYERT, R. M. and MARCH, J. G.1963. A Behavioural Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall .
15.
DUBIN, R.1962. `Business Behaviour Behaviourally Viewed', in G. B. Strother (ed). Social Science Approaches to Business Behaviour, London: Tavistock , 11-55.
16.
EMERY, F. E. and TRIST, E. L.1965. `The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments' , Human Relations, 18: 21-32 .
17.
GALBRAITH, J. K.1967. The New Industrial State, London: Hamish Hamilton .
18.
GOLDTHORPE, J. H. , LOCKWOOD, D. , BECHHOFER, F. , and PLATT, J.1968. The Affluent Worker: Industrial Attitudes and Behaviour, Cambridge: The University Press .
19.
GOULDNER, A. W.1955. `Metaphysical Pathos and the Theory of Bureaucracy' . American Political Science Review, XLIX: 496-507 .
20.
HAGE, J.1965. `An Axiomatic Theory of Organizations' , Administrative Science Quarterly, 10: 289-320 .
21.
HAGE, J. and AIKEN, M.1967. `Program Change and Organizational Properties—A Comparative Analysis' , American Journal of Sociology, 72: 503-519 .
22.
HAGE, J. and AIKEN, M.1969. `Routine Technology, Social Structure and Organizational Goals' , Administrative Science Quarterly, 14: 366-376 .
23.
HAGE, J. and AMEN, M.1970. Social Change in Complex Organizations, New York: Random House .
24.
HALL, R. H.1962. `Intraorganizational Structural Variation: Application of the Bureaucratic Model' , Administrative Science Quarterly, 7: 295-308 .
25.
HALL, R. H.1963. `The Concept of Bureaucracy: An Empirical Assessment' , American Journal of Sociology, 69: 32-40 .
26.
HALL, R. H. , HAAS, J. E. , and JOHNSON, J. N.1967. `Organizational Size, Complexity and Formalization' , American Sociological Review, 32: 903-912 .
27.
HALL, R. H. and TITTLE, C. R.1966. `A Note on Bureaucracy and its "Correlates" ' , American Journal of Sociology, 72: 267-272 .
28.
HARVEY, E.1968. `Technology and the Structure of Organizations' , American Sociological Review, 33, 2: 247-259 .
29.
HICKSON, D. J.et al.1969. `Operations Technology and Organization Structure: An Empirical Reappraisal' , Administrative Science Quarterly, 14: 378-397 .
30.
HICKSON, D. J.et al.1970. `Organization: Is Technology the Key?' , Personnel Management:21-26 .
31.
HICKSON, D. J.et al.1971. `A Strategic Contingencies Theory of Intra-Organizational Power' , Administrative Science Quarterly. (forthcoming)
32.
HOUSE, R. J. and WIGDOR, L. A.1967. `Herzberg's Dual-Factor Theory of Job Satisfaction and Motivation: A Review of the Evidence and a Criticism' , Personnel Psychology, 20: 369-389 .
33.
INGHAM, G. K.1970. Work and Behaviour in Industrial Organization, Cambridge: The University Press .
34.
KHANDWALLA, P. N.1970. Environment and the Organization Structure of Firms, Montreal: McGill University Faculty of Management Working Paper.
35.
KRONENBERG, P. S.1969, Micropolitics and Public Planning, Chapter 3 on `Interorganizational Behavior', pre-publication manuscript.
36.
LAWRENCE, P. R. and LORSCH J. W.1967. Organization and Environment, Boston: Harvard Business School .
37.
LEVINE, S. and WHITE P. E.1961. `Exchange as a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Interorganizational Relationships' , Administrative Science Quarterly, 5: 583-601 .
38.
MANN, M.1970. `The Social Cohesion of Liberal Democracy' , American Sociological Review, 35: 423-439 .
39.
MILLER, E. J. and RICE, A. K.1967. Systems of Organization, London: Tavistock .
40.
NORMANN, R.1969a. `Organization, Mediation, and Environment', S.I.A.R. Report, No. UPM-RN-91, Stockholm .
41.
NORMANN, R.1969b. `Some Conclusions from 13 Case Studies of New Product Development', S.I.A.R. Report, No. UPM-RN-100, Stockholm .
42.
PAUL, W. J. and ROBERTSON, K. B.1970. Job Enrichment and Employee Motivation, London: Gower Press .
43.
PERROW, C.1967. `A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations,'American Sociological Review, 32: 194-208 .
44.
PERROW, C.1970. Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View, London: Tavistock .
45.
PRICE, J. L.1968. Organizational Effectiveness: An Inventory of Propositions, Homewood, Ill.: Irwin .
46.
PUGH, D. S. , et al.1963. `A Conceptual Scheme for Organizational Analysis' , Administrative Science Quarterly, 8: 289-315 .
47.
PUGH, D. S. , et al.1968. `Dimensions of Organization Structure' , Administrative Science Quarterly, 13: 65-105 .
48.
PUGH, D. S.et al.1969a. `The Context of Organization Structures' , Administrative Science Quarterly, 14: 91-114 .
49.
PUGH, D. S.et al.1969b. `An Empirical Taxonomy of Structures of Work Organizations' , Administrative Science Quarterly, 14: 115-126 .
50.
SADLER, P. J. and BARRY, B. A.1970. Organisational Development, London: Longmans .
51.
SILVERMAN, D.1970. The Theory of Organisations, London: Heinemann .
52.
STINCHCOMBE, A. L.1959. `Bureaucratic and Craft Administration of Production: A Comparative Study' , Administrative Science Quarterly, 4: 168-187 .
53.
THOMPSON, J. D.1967. Organizations in Action, New York: McGraw-Hill .
54.
THOMPSON, J. D. and McEWEN, W. J.1958. `Organizational Goals and Environment: Goal-Setting as an Interaction Process' , American Sociological Review, 23: 23-31 .
55.
TRIST, E. L.et al.1963. Organizational Choice, London: Tavistock .
56.
WASMUTH, W. J.et al.1970. Human Resources Administration, Boston: Houghton Mifflin .
57.
WEICK, K. E.1969. The Social Psychology of Organizing, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley .
58.
WOODWARD, J.1965. Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice, London: Oxford University Press .
59.
WOODWARD, J.1970. editor, Industrial Organization: Behaviour and Control, London: Oxford University Press .
60.
YUCHTMAN, E. and SEASHORE, S. E.1967. `A System Resource Approach to Organizational Effectiveness' . American Sociological Review32: 891-903 .
