Abstract
A re-examination is made of the argument that slightly improved class differentials in full-time education have been offset by a decline in chances of promotion during a career. Past support for this idea has been drawn from age group comparisons usually in the context of surveys of managers. Census data giving the distribution of terminal education ages in the population are used to show that there are in fact important educational differences between separate generations in middle and higher occupations. It is also argued that the comparison of age groups is an unreliable method of studying occupational recruitment and that; in addition, the educational composition of so-called middle-class occupations is very diverse. In terms of their impact on the proportion of early leavers found in middle-class occupations, the apparent changes between generations appear, contrary to expectation, to be rather insignificant. It is inferred that constant social mobility rates cannot be explained by trends in promotions from the ranks on the strength of present evidence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
