Categorising certain forms of human movement as ‘migration’ and others as ‘mobility’ has far-reaching consequences. We introduce the migration–mobility nexus as a framework for other researchers to interrogate the relationship between these two categories of human movement and explain how they shape different social representations. Our framework articulates four ideal-typical interplays between categories of migration and categories of mobility: continuum (fluid mobilities transform into more stable forms of migration and vice versa), enablement (migration requires mobility, and mobility can trigger migration), hierarchy (migration and mobility are political categories that legitimise hierarchies of movement) and opposition (migration and mobility are pitted against each other). These interplays reveal the normative underpinnings of different categories, which we argue are too often implicit and unacknowledged.
AmelinaA (2021) After the reflexive turn in migration studies: Towards the doing migration approach. Population, Space and Place27(1): e2368.
2.
AmelinaALutzH (2019) Gender and Migration. Transnational and Intersectional Perspectives. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
AndersonB (2017) Towards a new politics of migration?Ethnic and Racial Studies40(9): 1527–1537.
4.
AndersonB (2019) New directions in migration studies: Towards methodological de-nationalism. Comparative Migration Studies7(1): 36.
5.
AndersonBBlinderS (2015) Who counts as a migrant? Definitions and their consequences. Policy Brief, The Migration Observatory, University of Oxford, Oxford.
6.
AtaçIRygielKStierlM (2021) Building transversal solidarities in European cities: Open harbours, safe communities, home. Critical Sociology47(6): 923–939.
7.
BauböckR (2021) Mobility and migration: Physical, contextual, and perspectival interpretations. In: Zapata-BarreroRJacobsDKastoryanoR (eds) Contested Concepts in Migration Studies. Chicago, IL: Routledge, 167–181.
8.
BaumanZ (1998) Globalization: The Human Consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press.
9.
BeckU (2000) The cosmopolitan perspective: Sociology of the second age of modernity. The British Journal of Sociology51(1): 79–105.
10.
BennourS (2020) Intention to become a citizen: Do subnational integration policies have an influence? Empirical evidence from Swiss cantons. Regional Studies54(11): 1535–1545.
11.
BluntASheringhamO (2019) Home-city geographies: Urban dwelling and mobility. Progress in Human Geography43(5): 815–834.
12.
BolayM (2021) Disentangling mining and migratory routes in West Africa: Decisions to move in migranticised settings. Social Inclusion9(1): 235–246.
13.
BonjourSChauvinS (2018) Social class, migration policy and migrant strategies: An introduction. International Migration56(4): 5–18.
14.
BrankampH (2020) Refugees in uniform: Community policing as a technology of government in Kakuma refugee camp, Kenya. Journal of Eastern African Studies14(2): 270–290.
15.
BrubakerR (2013) Categories of analysis and categories of practice: A note on the study of Muslims in European countries of immigration. Ethnic and Racial Studies36(1): 1–8.
16.
BrubakerRCooperF (2000) Beyond ‘identity’. Theory and Society29(1): 1–47.
17.
CangiàF (2019) ‘Switzerland doesn’t want me’: Work, precarity and emotions for mobile professionals’ partners. Migration Letters16(2): 207–217.
18.
CrawleyHSkleparisD (2018) Refugees, migrants, neither, both: Categorical fetishism and the politics of bounding in Europe’s ‘migration crisis’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies44(1): 48–64.
19.
CresswellT (2006) On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
CresswellT (2010) Towards a politics of mobility. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space28: 17–31.
21.
DahindenJ (2010) The dynamics of migrants’ transnational formations: Between mobility and locality. In: BauböckRFaistT (eds) Diaspora and Transnationalism. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press, 51–71.
22.
DahindenJ (2016) A plea for the ‘de-migranticization’ of research on migration and integration. Ethnic and Racial Studies39(13): 2207–2225.
23.
DahindenJFischerCMenetJ (2021) Knowledge production, reflexivity, and the use of categories in migration studies: Tackling challenges in the field. Ethnic and Racial Studies44(4): 535–554.
24.
DavidsonAC (2021) Radical mobilities. Progress in Human Geography45(1): 25–48.
25.
De GraauwE (2014) Municipal ID cards for undocumented immigrants: Local bureaucratic membership in a federal system. Politics & Society42(3): 309–330.
26.
de HaasH (2022) A theory of migration: The aspirations-capabilities framework. Comparative Migration Studies9(8): 1–35.
27.
de HaasHCastlesSMillerMJ (2019) The Age of Migration. International Population Movements in the Modern World. Basingstoke and New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
28.
de VriesLAWeatherheadKT (2021) Politics of knowledge production in the global compact for migration. Interventions23(2): 294–312.
29.
DinesNMontagnaNVacchelliE (2018) Beyond crisis talk: Interrogating migration and crises in Europe. Sociology52(3): 439–447.
30.
Duchêne-LacroixCGötzöMSontagK (2016) The experience of multilocal living: Mobile immobilities or immobile mobilities? In: GutekunstMHacklALeonciniS, et al. (eds) Bounded Mobilities. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 265–282.
31.
EuleTBorrelliLMLindbergA, et al (2019) Migrants Before the Law. Contested Migration Control in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
FasaniFMazzaJ (2020) Immigrant key workers: Their contribution to Europe’s COVID-19 Response. IZA DP, 13178. Available at: http://ftp.iza.org/pp155.pdf (accessed 15 December 2023).
33.
FavellA (2007) Rebooting migration theory: Interdisciplinarity, globality, and postdisciplinarity in migration studies. In: BrettellCBHollifieldJF (eds) Migration Theory: Talking across Disciplines. London and New York, NY: Routledge, 259–278.
34.
FavellA (2022) The Integration Nation: Immigration and Colonial Power in Liberal Democracies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
35.
FilindraAManatschalA (2019) Coping with a changing integration policy context : American state policies and their effects on immigrant political engagement. Regional Studies54(11): 1546–1557.
36.
GaleanoJPontAWannerP (2022) A longitudinal analysis of naturalization and international migration in Switzerland, 2011–2017. Journal of International Migration and Integration23: 889–910.
37.
GamlenA (2020) Migration and Mobility after the 2020 Pandemic: The End of an Age?Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Migration (IOM).
38.
GarcíaSJ (2017) Bridging critical race theory and migration: Moving beyond assimilation theories. Sociology Compass11(6): e12484.
39.
GiddensA (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
40.
GillespieAHowarthCSCornishF (2012) Four problems for researchers using social categories. Culture and Psychology18(3): 391–402.
41.
Glick SchillerNSalazarNB (2013) Regimes of mobility across the globe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies39(2): 183–200.
42.
HägerstrandT (1975) Space, time and human conditions. In: KarlqvistA (ed.) Dynamic Allocation of Urban Space. Farnborough: Saxon House, 3–14.
43.
HallS (1997) The spectacle of the other. In: HallS (ed.) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Milton Keynes: Open University, 225–279.
44.
HamlinR (2021) Crossing: How We Label and React to People on the Move. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
45.
Hoffmeyer-ZlotnikP (2020) Between flows and places: Conceptualizing the migration–mobility nexus. NCCR on the move Working Paper Series, University of Neuchatel, Issue 25.
46.
HollifieldJF (2020) Is migration a unique field of study in social sciences? A response to Levy, Pisarevskaya, and Scholten. Comparative Migration Studies8(1): 34
47.
International Organization for Migration (IOM) (2023) IOM definition of ‘migrant’. Available at: https://www.iom.int/about-migration (accessed 2 March 2023).
48.
IsaakyanI (2022) Temporariness management by elite migrant-artists. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies48(16): 3860–3878.
49.
LimD (2021) Low-skilled migrants and the historical reproduction of immigration injustice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice24: 1229–1244.
50.
JaakkolaE (2020) Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review10: 18–26.
51.
KaufmannVBergmanMMJoyeD (2004) Motility: Mobility as capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research28(4): 745–756.
52.
KingRSkeldonR (2010) ‘Mind the gap!’: Integrating approaches to internal and international migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies36(10): 1619–1646.
53.
KloetzerLClarke-HabibiSMehmetiT, et al (2021) Welcoming mobile children at school: Institutional responses and new questions. European Journal of Psychology of Education 37: 459–488.
54.
KoslowskiR (2011) Global Mobility Regimes: A Conceptual Framework. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
55.
LevitanD (2019) The art of living in transitoriness: Strategies of families in repeated geographical mobility. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science53(2): 258–282.
56.
LevittP (2012) What’s wrong with migration scholarship? A critique and a way forward. Identities19(4): 493–500.
57.
LubkemannSC (2008) Involuntary immobility: On a theoretical invisibility in forced migration studies. Journal of Refugee Studies21(4): 454–475.
58.
LucassenJLucassenL (2009) The mobility transition revisited, 1500-1900: What the case of Europe can offer to global history. Journal of Global History4(3): 347–377.
59.
McAuliffeMKhadriaB (2020) Providing perspective on migration and mobility in increasingly uncertain times. In: World Migration Report. Geneva: International Organization for Migration, 1–14.
60.
MalkkiL (1992) National geographic: The rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees. Cultural Anthropology7(1): 24–44.
61.
MartinSBergmannJ (2021) (Im)mobility in the age of COVID-19. International Migration Review55(3): 660–687.
62.
MasseyD (1991) Flexible sexism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space9(1): 31–57.
63.
MauS (2010) Mobility citizenship, inequality, and the liberal state. International Political Sociology4(4): 339–361.
64.
MauSGülzauFLaubeL, et al (2015) The global mobility divide: How visa policies have evolved over time. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies41(8): 1192–1213.
65.
MayblinL (2017) Asylum After Empire: Colonial Legacies in the Politics of Asylum Seeking. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
66.
MengXManningC (2010) The Great Migration. Rural – Urban Migration in China and Indonesia. Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing.
67.
MezzadraS (2020) Abolitionist vistas of the human. Border struggles, migration and freedom of movement. Citizenship Studies24(4): 424–440.
68.
MoretJ (2020) Mobility capital: Somali migrants’ trajectories of (im)mobilities and the negotiation of social inequalities across borders. Geoforum116: 235–242.
69.
NailT (2015) The Figure of the Migrant. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
70.
NshimbiCC (2021) Rational actors, passive and helpless victims, neither, both: EU Borders and the drive to migrate in the horn of Africa. Social Inclusion9(1): 257–267.
PalmaryI (2021) Gender, sexuality and migration: Global questions and their colonial legacies. In: MoraCPiperN (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Migration. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 73–87.
73.
ParsonsL (2019) Structuring the emotional landscape of climate change migration: Towards climate mobilities in geography. Progress in Human Geography43(4): 670–690.
74.
PedersenOCZittounT (2022) ‘I have been born, raised and lived my whole life here’: Perpetually on the move while remaining still. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science56: 755–778.
75.
PiccoliLDzankicJRuedinD (2021) Citizenship, Migration and Mobility in a Pandemic (CMMP): A global dataset of COVID-19 restrictions on human movement. PLoS One16(3): e0248066.
76.
PiccoliLRuedinDGeddesA (2023) A global network of scholars? The geographical concentration of institutes in migration studies and its implications. Comparative Migration Studies11(16): 1–16.
77.
PisarevskayaALevyNScholtenP, et al (2019) Mapping migration studies: An empirical analysis of the coming of age of a research field. Migration Studies8(3): 455–481.
78.
PooleyCGTurnbullJ (1998) Migration and Mobility in Britain Since the Eighteenth Century. London and New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
79.
RavensteinEG (1885) The laws of migration. Journal of the Statistical Society of London48(2): 167–235.
80.
RecchiEFavellA (2019) Everyday Europe. Social Transnationalism in an Unsettled Continent. Bristol: Policy Press.
81.
RecchiEFlipoA (2019) Spatial mobility in social theory. Società, Mutamento, Politica10(20): 125–137.
82.
RezzonicoL (2021) Legitimising exclusion through criminalisation: an ethnography of immigration detention in Switzerland. Doctoral Thesis, Université de Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
83.
SafiM (2019) Migration and inequality. Cambridge: Polity.
84.
SandozL (2020) Understanding access to the labour market through migration channels. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies46(1): 222–241.
85.
SchaerMDahindenJToaderA (2017) Transnational mobility among early-career academics: Gendered aspects of negotiations and arrangements within heterosexual couples. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies43(8): 1292–1307.
86.
ScheelS (2019) Autonomy of Migration? Appropriating Mobility within Biometric Border Regimes. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
87.
ScheelSTazzioliM (2022) Who is a migrant? Abandoning the nation-state point of view in the study of migration. Migration Politics1(1): 1–23.
88.
SchinkelW (2018) Against ‘immigrant integration’: For an end to neocolonial knowledge production. Comparative Migration Studies6(1): 1–17.
89.
ShacharA (2020) Shifting Border: Legal Cartographies of Migration and Mobility: Ayelet Shachar in Dialogue. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
90.
ShellerM (2018) Mobility Justice: The Politics of Movement in an Age of Extremes. London: Verso.
91.
ShellerMUrryJ (2006) The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space38(2): 207–226.
92.
SkeggsB (2013) Class, Self, Culture. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
93.
SöderströmORanderiaSRuedinD, et al (2013) Critical Mobilities. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
94.
SotoL (2018) Girlhood in the Borderlands: Mexican Teens Caught in the Crossroads of Migration. New York, NY: New York University Press.
95.
SpivakGC (1988) Can the subaltern speak? In: NelsonCGrossbergL (eds) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 271–313.
96.
StennerP (2017) Liminality and Experience. A Transdisciplinary Approach to the Psychosocial. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
97.
TazzioliM (2020) Governing migrant mobility through mobility: Containment and dispersal at the internal frontiers of Europe. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space38(1): 3–19.
98.
TissotF (2020) Doing Family on the Move Highly-Skilled Migrants in Switzerland and Germany. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.
99.
TorpeyJC (1998) Coming and going: On the state monopolization of the legitimate ‘Means of Movement’. Sociological Theory16(3): 239–259.
100.
UrryJ (2007) Mobilities. Oxford: Polity Press.
101.
ValsinerJMolenaarPCMLyraMCDP, et al (2009) Dynamic Process Methodology in the Social and Developmental Sciences. New York, NY: Springer.
102.
WimmerAGlick SchillerN (2002) Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks2(4): 301–334.
103.
WimmerASchillerNG (2002) Methodological nationalism and the study of migration. European Journal of Sociology43(2): 217–240.
104.
WyssADahindenJ (2022) Disentangling entangled mobilities: Reflections on forms of knowledge production within migration studies. Comparative Migration Studies10(1): 33.
105.
YeohBSRamdasK (2014) Gender, migration, mobility and transnationalism. Gender, Place & Culture21(10): 1197–1213.
106.
YoungI (2007) Global Challenges: War, Self Determination and Responsibility for Justice. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
107.
ZetterR (1991) Labelling refugees: Forming and transforming a bureaucratic identity. Journal of Refugee Studies4(1): 39–62.
108.
ZetterR (2007) More labels, fewer refugees: Remaking the refugee label in an era of globalization. Journal of Refugee Studies20(2): 172–192.
109.
ZittounT (2020) Imagination in people and societies on the move: A sociocultural psychology perspective. Culture and Psychology26(4): 654–675.
110.
ZolbergAR (1981) International migrations in political perspective. International Migration Review15(1 Suppl.): 3–27.
111.
ZuffereyJSteinerIRuedinD (2021) The many forms of multiple migrations: Evidence from a sequence analysis in Switzerland, 1998 to 2008. International Migration Review55(1): 254–279.
