We examine how inter-class relationships shape attitudes towards inequality. Our theoretical frame defines attitudes towards inequality as ethical dispositions and hypothesises that class-based network diversity may favour the development of what has been termed a ‘reflexive habitus’ that likely pushes for more egalitarian dispositions. The focus of our enquiry is on Chile – one of the most unequal countries in the world. We use large-scale representative survey data collected in 2016 (N = 2927). Results of our regression analyses indicate that class diversity in social networks strongly increases awareness of inequality and more egalitarian preferences while reducing belief in meritocracy and the perception that the current distribution is fair. Additional analyses suggest that network diversity influences views on inequality to a similar degree among individuals from different social classes, except for meritocratic beliefs, where network diversity especially affects the upper class. We conclude by discussing the importance of reducing socio-economic segregation.
AlecuAHellandHHjellbrekkeJ, et al. (2022) Who you know: The classed structure of social capital. The British Journal of Sociology73(30): 505–535.
3.
AlesinaACozziGMantovanN (2012) The evolution of ideology, fairness and redistribution. The Economic Journal122(565): 1244–1261.
4.
AlvaredoFChancelLPikettyT, et al. (2018) World Inequality Report 2018. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
5.
AtkinsonW (2021) Fields and individuals: From Bourdieu to Lahire and back again. European Journal of Social Theory24(2): 195–210.
6.
AtkinsonW (2022) Bourdieu and sociological biography: The case of Vincent van Gogh’s choice of profession. Sociology56(5): 967–982.
7.
BotteroW (2005) Stratification: Social Division and Inequality. Abingdon: Routledge.
8.
BotteroW (2010) Intersubjectivity and Bourdieusian approaches to ‘identity’. Cultural Sociology4(1): 3–22.
9.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction. London: Routledge.
10.
BourdieuP (1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
BourdieuP (1998) Practical Reason. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
BourdieuPWacquantL (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity.
13.
BrooksCSvallforsS (2010) Why does class matter? Policy attitudes, mechanisms, and the case of the Nordic countries. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility28(2): 199–213.
14.
CarrascoAHernándezMHoneyN, et al. (2021) School admission in Chile, new rules of the game, and the devaluation of Middle-class capitals. British Journal of Sociology of Education42(2): 179–195.
15.
CastilloJGarcía-CastroJVenegasM (2022) Perception of economic inequality: Concepts, associated factors and prospects of a burgeoning research agenda. International Journal of Social Psychology37(1): 180–207.
16.
CastilloJMaderoISalamovichA (2013) Clivajes partidarios y cambios en preferencias distributivas en Chile. Revista de Ciencia Política33(2): 469–488.
17.
CastilloJTorresAAtriaJ, et al. (2019) Meritocracia y desigualdad económica: Percepciones, preferencias e implicancias. Revista Internacional de Sociología77(1): e117.
18.
ChanTGoldthorpeJ (2007) Class and status: The conceptual distinction and its empirical relevance. American Sociological Review72(4): 512–532.
19.
ChuaVKohGSerT, et al. (2020) Social Capital in Singapore: The Power of Network Diversity. London: Routledge.
20.
ClarkASenikC (2010) Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe. The Economic Journal120(544): 573–594.
21.
CondonMWichowskyA (2020) Inequality in the social mind: Social comparison and support for redistribution. The Journal of Politics82(1): 149–161.
22.
CrossleyN (2001) The phenomenological habitus and its construction. Theory and Society30(1): 81–120.
23.
CrucesGPerez-TrugliaRTetazM (2013) Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment. Journal of Public Economics98: 100–112.
24.
EdmistonD (2018) The poor ‘sociological imagination’ of the rich: Explaining attitudinal divergence towards welfare, inequality, and redistribution. Social Policy & Administration52(5): 983–997.
25.
ELSOC (2018) Estudio Longitudinal Social de Chile 2016. Harvard Dataverse. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/0KIRBJ (accessed 27 November 2023).
26.
EspinozaVNúñezJ (2014) Movilidad ocupacional en Chile 2001-2009. ¿Desigualdad de ingresos con igualdad de oportunidades?Revista Internacional de Sociología72(1): 57–82.
27.
EvansGStubagerRLangsætherPE (2022) The conditional politics of class identity: Class origins, identity and political attitudes in comparative perspective. West European Politics45(6): 1178–1205.
28.
EvansMKelleyJ (2017) Communism, capitalism, and images of class: Effects of reference groups, reality, and regime in 43 nations and 110,000 individuals, 1987-2009. Cross-Cultural Research51(4): 315–359.
29.
GanzeboomHB (2010) A new International Socio-Economic Index (ISEI) of occupational status for the International Standard Classification of Occupation 2008 (ISCO-08) constructed with data from the ISSP 2002–2007. Annual conference of international social survey programme, Lisbon (vol. 1), May.
30.
GarretónM (2017) City profile: Actually existing neoliberalism in Greater Santiago. Cities65: 32–50.
31.
GlanvilleJAnderssonMPaxtonP (2013) Do social connections create trust? An examination using new longitudinal data. Social Forces92(2): 545–562.
32.
GoldthorpeJ (2010) Class analysis and the reorientation of class theory: The case of persisting differentials in educational attainment. The British Journal of Sociology61(S1): 311–335.
33.
HällstenMEdlingCRydgrenJ (2015) The effects of specific occupations in position generator measures of social capital. Social Networks40: 55–63.
34.
HäusermannSKurerTSchwanderH (2016) Sharing the risk? Households, labor market vulnerability, and social policy preferences in Western Europe. The Journal of Politics78(4): 1045–1060.
35.
IrwinS (2018) Lay perceptions of inequality and social structure. Sociology52(2): 211–227.
36.
KearnsABaileyNGannonM, et al. (2014) ‘All in it together’? Social cohesion in a divided society: Attitudes to income inequality and redistribution in a residential context. Journal of Social Policy43(3): 453–477.
37.
KhanS (2012) Privilege: The Making of an Adolescent Elite at St. Paul’s School. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
LangsætherPEvansG (2020) More than self-interest: Why different classes have different attitudes to income inequality. The British Journal of Sociology71(4): 594–607.
39.
LiYSavageMWardeA (2008) Social mobility and social capital in contemporary Britain. The British Journal of Sociology59(3): 391–411.
40.
LindhAMcCallL (2020) Class position and political opinion in rich democracies. Annual Review of Sociology46: 419–441.
41.
LindhAAnderssonAVolkerB (2021) The missing link: Network influences on class divides in political attitudes. European Sociological Review37(5): 695–712.
42.
LockwoodD (1966) Sources of variation in working class images of society. The Sociological Review14(3): 249–267.
43.
McCoySMajorB (2007) Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology43(3): 341–351.
44.
MeltzerARichardS (1981) A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy89(5): 914–927.
45.
MerollaDHuntMSerpeR (2011) Concentrated disadvantage and beliefs about the causes of poverty: A multi-level analysis. Sociological Perspectives54(2): 205–227.
46.
MijsJ (2021) The paradox of inequality: Income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand. Socio-Economic Review19(1): 7–35.
47.
NeckermanKMTorcheF (2007) Inequality: Causes and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology33: 335–357.
48.
NewmanB (2014) My poor friend: Financial distress in one’s social network, the perceived power of the rich, and support for redistribution. The Journal of Politics76(1): 126–138.
49.
NewmanBJohnstonCLownP (2015) False consciousness or class awareness? Local income inequality, personal economic position, and belief in American meritocracy. American Journal of Political Science59(2): 326–340.
50.
OeschDRennwaldL (2018) Electoral competition in Europe’s new tripolar political space: Class voting for the left, centre-right and radical right. European Journal of Political Research57(4): 783–807.
51.
OsbergLSmeedingT (2006) ‘Fair’ inequality? Attitudes toward pay differentials: The United States in comparative perspective. American Sociological Review71(3): 450–473.
52.
OteroGVolkerBRozerJ (2021) Open but segregated? Class divisions and the network structure of social capital in Chile. Social Forces100(2): 649–679.
53.
PaskovMWeisstannerD (2022) Cross-class embeddedness through family ties and support for income redistribution. European Sociological Review38(2): 286–303.
54.
PettigrewTTroppL (2006) A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90(5): 751–783.
55.
PikettyT (2014) Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
PNUD (2017) Desiguales. Orígenes, Cambios y Desafíos de la Brecha Social en Chile. Santiago: Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo.
57.
ReayD (2004) ‘It’s all becoming a habitus’: Beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research. British Journal of Sociology of Education25(4): 431–444.
58.
RothsteinBUslanerE (2005) All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics58(1): 41–72.
59.
SandelM (2021) The Tyranny of Merit: What’s become of the Common Good?London: Penguin.
60.
SayerA (2005) The Moral Significance of Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
SennettR (2012) Together: The Rituals, Pleasures and Politics of Cooperation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
62.
SvallforsS (2006) The Moral Economy of Class: Class and Attitudes in Comparative Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
63.
SweetmanP (2003) Twenty-first century dis-ease? Habitual reflexivity or the reflexive habitus. The Sociological Review51(4): 528–549.
64.
ThalA (2017) Class isolation and affluent Americans’ perception of social conditions. Political Behavior39(2): 401–424.
65.
TorcheF (2005) Unequal but fluid: Social mobility in Chile in comparative perspective. American Sociological Review70(3): 422–450.
66.
Van de WerfhorstHDe GraafN (2004) The sources of political orientations in post-industrial society: Social class and education revisited. The British Journal of Sociology55(2): 211–235.
67.
Van TubergenFVolkerB (2015) Inequality in access to social capital in the Netherlands. Sociology49(3): 521–538.
68.
World Inequality Database (WID) (2022) Top 1% share (indicator). Available at: https://wid.world/ (accessed 11 July 2022).
69.
WrightEChoD (1992) The relative permeability of class boundaries to cross-class friendships: A comparative study of the United States, Canada, Sweden, and Norway. American Sociological Review57(1): 85–102.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
