Drawing on qualitative research involving Christian-Muslim couples in Italy, France and Belgium, the article explores the concept of mixedness by employing Finch’s concept of ‘displaying family’ to reach two goals: how the concept of mixedness bears multiple meanings and how the narrative tool of display works in the life story approach. The analysis distinguishes three main dimensions partners deploy to articulate the concept of mixedness. These are: (1) mixedness as a stigma to reject; (2) mixedness as difference that emerges in a couple’s daily life; and (3) mixedness as a resource to be valued by society. The analysis reveals how partners contest and redefine the concept of mixedness and how narratives work as a tool of family display through which partners: deny a socially ascribed negative definition of their family, narratively articulate the activity of ‘doing family’ on a daily basis and (re)signify a contested definition of family.
AlmackK (2011) Display work: Lesbian parent couples and their families of origin negotiating new kin relationships. In: DermottESeymourJ (eds) Displaying Families. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.102–118.
2.
ArweckENesbittE (2010) Young people’s identity formation in mixed-faith families: Continuity or discontinuity of religious traditions?Journal of Contemporary Religion25(1): 67–87.
3.
BayrakliAHafezF (eds) (2017) European Islamophobia Report. Istanbul, Turkey: SETA.
4.
BertauxD (1998) Les Récits de Vie. Paris: Editions Nathan.
5.
BjørnholtMFarstadGR (2014) ‘Am I rambling?’: On the advantages of interviewing couples together. Qualitative Research14(1): 3–19.
6.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
7.
BrittonJ (2019) Muslim men, racialised masculinities and personal life. Sociology53(1): 36–51.
8.
CerchiaroF (2016) Amori e confini. Le coppie miste tra islam, educazione dei figli e vita quotidiana. Napoli, Italy: Guida Editori.
9.
CerchiaroF (2019) ‘In the name of the children’: Mixed couples’ parenting analysed through their naming practices. Identities26(1): 51–68.
10.
CerchiaroF (2021) Dissonant masculinities? Migration, emotions and masculinities in marriages between Italian women and Moroccan men living in Italy. Journal of Gender Studies30(3): 256–269.
11.
CerchiaroF (2022a) ‘When I told my parents I was going to marry a Muslim. . .’: Social perception and attitudes towards intermarriage in Italy, France and Belgium. Social Compass69(3): 329–346.
12.
CerchiaroF (2022b) Advancing research in couples studies. Why, when and how to combine individual and couple interview. Quality & Quantity. Epub ahead of print 20 May 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-022-01395-9.
13.
CerchiaroFHoutmanDAupersS (2015) Christian-Muslim couples in the Veneto region, northeastern Italy: Dealing with religious pluralism in everyday family life. Social Compass62(1): 43–60.
14.
CerchiaroFOdassoL (2021) ‘Why do we have to circumcise our son?’: Meanings behind male circumcision in the life stories of mixed couples with a Muslim partner. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. Epub ahead of print 15 May 2021. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2021.1926941.
15.
ColletB (2015) From intermarriage to conjugal mixedness: Theoretical considerations illustrated by empirical data in France. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science662(1): 129–147.
16.
DermottESeymourJ (eds) (2011) Displaying Families. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
EdwardsRCaballeroCPuthusseryS (2009) Parenting children from ‘mixed’ racial, ethnic and faith backgrounds: Typifications of difference and belonging. Journal of Ethnic and Racial Studies33(6): 949–967.
FinchJ (2011) Exploring the concept of display in family relationships. In: DermottESeymourJ (eds) Displaying Families. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.197–205.
20.
Fresnoza-FlotA (2022) Homestay, sleepover, and commensality: Three intimate methods in the study of ‘mixed’ families. Genealogy6(2): 34.
21.
HaynesJDermottE (2011) Displaying mixedness: Differences and family relationships. In: DermottESeymourJ (eds) Displaying Families. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.145–159.
22.
KoeletSde ValkHA (2016) Social networks and feelings of social loneliness after migration: The case of European migrants with a native partner in Belgium. Ethnicities16(4): 610–630.
23.
LaurenceJVaisseJ (2007) Integrating Islam: Political and Religious Challenges in Contemporary France. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
24.
Lévi-StraussC (1969 [1949]) The Elementary Structures of Kinship (Trans by BellJHvon SturmerJRNeedhamR). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
25.
MeerN (2013) Racialization and religion: Race, culture and difference in the study of antisemitism and Islamophobia. Ethnic and Racial Studies36(3): 385–398.
26.
MorganDHJ (1985) Politics, the Family and Social Theory. London: Routledge.
27.
MorganDHJ (1996) Family Connections: An Introduction to Family Studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28.
RibberinkEAchterbergPHoutmanD (2017) Secular tolerance? Anti-Muslim sentiment in Western Europe. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion56(2): 259–276.
29.
SchützA (1944) The stranger: An essay in social psychology. American Journal of Sociology49(6): 499–507.
30.
SeymourJ (2011) ‘Family hold back’: Displaying families in the single-location home/workplace. In: DermottESeymourJ (eds) Displaying Families. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.160–174.
31.
SongMAspinallP (2012) Is racial mismatch a problem for young ‘mixed race’ people in Britain? The findings of qualitative research. Ethnicities12(6): 730–753.
32.
StathamP (2016) How ordinary people view Muslim group rights in Britain, the Netherlands, France and Germany: Significant ‘gaps’ between majorities and Muslims?Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies42(2): 217–236.
33.
TherrienCLe GallJ (2012) Nouvelles perspectives sur la mixité conjugale: Le sujet et l’acteur au coeur de l’analyse. Enfances, Familles, Générations17: 1–20.
34.
VarroG (2003) Sociologie de la Mixité: De la Mixité Amoureuse Aux Mixités Sociales et Culturelles. Paris: Belin.
35.
WeeksJHeaphyBDonovanC (2001) Same Sex Intimacies: Families of Choice and Other Life Experiments. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
36.
WiseAVelayuthamS (eds) (2009) Everyday Multiculturalism. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
