The article explores a new aspect of the interplay of individualisation and democracy. I ask how individualisation affects a contentious ethos, a set of ethical relations that contentious actors cultivate towards themselves and others in articulating their idea of the good. I analyse the ethea in the public through ‘how to become an activist’ books. The books instruct individuals in how they should turn inwards and work on themselves to become activists. I delineate three ethea: individuals can work on themselves to discover their passion, connect to an impersonal truth or situate themselves in a structural context. These may undermine collective political projects but can also facilitate deep democratic engagement.
AdamsonMJohanssonM (2021) Writing class in and out: Constructions of class in elite businesswomen’s autobiographies. Sociology55(3): 487–504.
2.
AlexanderJ (2006) The Civil Sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
ArendtH (1968) Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York, NY: The Viking Press.
4.
AtkinsonW (2008) Not all that was solid has melted into air (or liquid): A critique of Bauman on individualization and class in liquid modernity. The Sociological Review56(1): 1–17.
5.
BangH (2005) Among everyday makers and expert citizens. In: FungAWrightEO (eds) Remaking Governance: Peoples, Politics and the Public Sphere. Bristol: Policy Press, 159–178.
BaumanZ (2001) The Individualized Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10.
BeckU (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE.
11.
BeckU (1997) The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
BeckUBeck-GernsheimE (2002) Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. London: SAGE.
13.
BellahRNMadsenRSullivanWM, et al. (1996) Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14.
BennettWLSegerbergA (2012) The logic of collective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society15(5): 739–768.
BrownW (1995) States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
BykovA (2019) Rediscovering the moral: The ‘old’ and ‘new’ sociology of morality in the context of the behavioural sciences. Sociology53(1): 192–207.
18.
CarenNGhoshalRARibasV (2011) A social movement generation: Cohort and period trends in protest attendance and petition signing. American Sociological Review76(1): 125–151.
19.
CastellsM (2010) The Power of Identity. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
20.
ConnollyWE (1993) Beyond good and evil: The ethical sensibility of Michel Foucault. Political Theory21(3): 365–389.
21.
ConnollyWE (1995) The Ethos of Pluralization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
22.
ConnollyWE (2002) Identity\Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
23.
ConnollyWE (2005) Pluralism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
24.
ConnollyWE (2008) Capitalism and Christianity, American Style. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
25.
ConnollyWE (2011) A World of Becoming. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
26.
DawsonM (2012) Reviewing the critique of individualization: The disembedded and embedded theses. Acta Sociologica55(4): 305–319.
27.
DelehantyJOyakawaM (2017) Building a collective moral imaginary: Personalist culture and social performance in faith-based community organizing. American Journal of Cultural Sociology6: 266–295.
28.
DurkheimE (1997) The Division of Labor in Society. New York, NY: The Free Press.
29.
DyrbergT (2014) Foucault on the Politics of Parrhesia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
FoucaultM (2010) The Government of Self and Others: Lectures at the Collège de France. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
GiddensA (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
34.
GrossN (2005) The detraditionalisation of intimacy reconsidered. Sociological Theory23(3): 286–311.
35.
Gøtzsche-AstrupJ (2022) A sociological perspective on the experience of contention. Sociological Theory. Epub ahead of print 2 May 2022. DOI: 10.1177/07352751221097115.
36.
HaenflerR (2019) Changing the world one virgin at a time: Abstinence pledgers, lifestyle movements, and social change. Social Movement Studies18(4): 425–443.
37.
HaenflerRJohnsonBJonesE (2012) Lifestyle movements: Exploring the intersection of lifestyle and social movements. Social Movement Studies11(1): 1–20.
38.
HardyT (1832) Memoir of Thomas Hardy. London: James Ridgway.
39.
HensbyA (2021) Political non-participation in elections, civic life and social movements. Sociology Compass15(1): 1–13.
40.
HitlinSVaiseyS (2013) The new sociology of morality. Annual Review of Sociology39: 51–68.
41.
HookwayN (2012) Emotions, body and self: Critiquing moral decline sociology. Sociology47(4): 841–857.
42.
HookwayN (2015) Moral decline sociology: Critiquing the legacy of Durkheim. Journal of Sociology51(29): 271–284.
43.
HookwayN (2018) The moral self: Class, narcissism and the problem of do-it-yourself moralities. The Sociological Review66(1): 107–121.
44.
HorowitzD (2014) Take no Prisoners: The Battle Plan for Defeating the Left. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing.
45.
JasperJ (1997) The Art of Moral Protest: Culture, Biography, and Creativity in Social Movements. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46.
JordanGMaloneyWA (2006) Explaining low participation rates: Collective action and the ‘concerned unmobilized’. In: ZittelTFuchsD (eds) Participatory Democracy and Political Participation: Can Participatory Engineering Bring Citizens Back In?London: Routledge, 127–151.
47.
KaraliotasL (2017) Staging equality in Greek squares: Hybrid spaces of political subjectification. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research41(1): 54–59.
48.
KioupkiolisA (2014) Towards a regime of post-political biopower? Dispatches from Greece, 2010–2012. Theory, Culture & Society31(1): 143–158.
49.
LaschC (1979) The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations. New York, NY: WW Norton.
50.
LeeRLM (2011) Modernity, solidity and agency: Liquidity reconsidered. Sociology45(4): 650–664.
51.
LichtermanP (1995) Beyond the seesaw model: Public commitment in a culture of self-fulfillment. Sociological Theory13(3): 275–300.
52.
LizardoO (2017) Improving cultural analysis: Considering personal culture in its declarative and nondeclarative modes. American Sociological Review82(1): 88–115.
53.
LukácsG (1972) History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
54.
McAdamDTarrowSTillyC (2001) Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
McNayL (2014) The Misguided Search for the Political: Social Weightlessness in Radical Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
MarshDO’TooleTJonesS (2007) Young People and Politics in the UK: Apathy or Alienation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
58.
MelucciA (1995) The process of collective identity. In: JohnstonHKlandermansB (eds) Social Movements and Culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 41–63.
59.
MeyerDSTarrowS (1998) The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
60.
MouffeC (2005) On the Political. Abingdon: Routledge.
61.
NehringDAlvaradoEHendriksE, et al. (2016) Transnational Popular Psychology and the Global Self-Help Industry: The Politics of Contemporary Social Change. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
62.
NietzscheF (2000) On the genealogy of morals. In: KaufmannW (ed.) Basic Writings of Nietzsche. New York, NY: The Modern Library, 437–600.
OwenD (2002) Equality, democracy, and self-respect: Reflections on Nietzsche’s agonal perfectionism. Journal of Nietzsche Studies24: 113–131.
65.
PotterJWetherellM (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behavoiur. London: SAGE.
66.
RasborgK (2017) From class society to the individualized society? A critical reassessment of individualization and class. Irish Journal of Sociology25(3): 229–249.
67.
RobertsonKRobertsonE (2019) How to Make a Difference: The Definitive Guide from the World’s Most Effective Activists [Adobe Digital Editions]. London: Octopus Publishing Group. Available at: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=43eSDwAAQBAJ&writeReview (accessed 11 June 2021).
68.
SarachildK (1970) A program for feminist ‘consciousness raising’. In: FirestoneSKoedtA (eds) Notes from the Second Year. New York: Radical Feminism, 78–80.
69.
SayerA (2011) Why Things Matter to People: Social Science, Values and Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70.
SayerA (2020) Critiquing – and rescuing – ‘character’. Sociology54(43): 460–481.
71.
SchmittC (2005) Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
72.
ShillingCMellorPA (2021) The fate of social character in an age of uncertainty. Sociology55(4): 823–839.
SkeggsB (2005) The making of class and gender through visualizing moral subject formation. Sociology39(5): 965–982.
75.
SkinnerDMayVRollockN (2016) Self-identity and its discontents: Sociology in the 1990s. Sociology50(6): 13–23.
76.
TaylorC (1989) Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77.
TaylorC (1991) The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
78.
TocquevilleA (2010) Democracy in America. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
79.
TrappmannVSeehausAMrozowickiA, et al. (2021) The moral boundary drawing of class: Social inequality and young precarious workers in Poland and Germany. Sociology55(3): 451–468.
WetherellMPotterJ (1988) Discourse analysis and the identification of interpretative repertoires. In: AntakiC (ed.) Analysing Everyday Explanation: A Casebook of Methods. London: SAGE, 168–183.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
