Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Conceptualisations of agency that incorporate notions of individuals all independently following or resisting rules cast actors as either passive or resistant, and yet (either way) both free and responsible. This article argues that Barry Barnes’ fundamentally social model of agency deserves greater attention for the possibility it offers of moving beyond neoliberal narratives and their individualistic foundations. It advances theoretical understandings of agency by suggesting that, within the framework offered by Barnes’ model, unequal burdens are created by local constructions of the responsibilised individual. Rather than being equally and a priori empowered with agency, individuals are revealed to be unequally impeded in fulfilling current local status expectations of a responsibilised ‘agent’. This article explores the implications of Barnes’ conceptualisation by indicating areas where giving attention to everyday discourses of choice and responsibility opens space to explore how the interplay of status expectations operates to enable or disable social membership.

Keywords

agency Barnes dualism individualisation intersecting statuses libertarianism neoliberal subjectivity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnett

Kloep

Hendry

, et al. (2011) Debating Emerging Adulthood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baker

(2008) The ideology of choice: Overstating progress and hiding injustice in the lives of young women. Women’s Studies International Forum 31(1): 53–64.

Barnes

(2000) Understanding Agency. London: SAGE.

Bauman

(2001) The Individualized Society. Cambridge: Polity.

Beck

(1992) Risk Society. London: SAGE.

Beck

Beck-Gernsheim

(2002) Individualization. London: SAGE.

Brannen

Nilsen

(2005) Individualisation, choice and structure. The Sociological Review 53(3): 412–428.

Caldwell

(2006) Agency and Change. New York: Routledge.

Coffey

Farrugia

(2014) Unpacking the black box. Journal of Youth Studies 17(4): 461–474.

10.

Côté

Bynner

(2008) Changes in the transition to adulthood in the UK and Canada: The role of structure and agency in emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth Studies 11(3): 251–268.

11.

Coxon

Sandall

Fulop

(2014) To what extent are women free to choose where to give birth? How discourses of risk, blame and responsibility influence birth place decisions. Health, Risk & Society 16(1): 51–67.

12.

Doolin

Lowe

(2002) To reveal is to critique: Actor-network theory and critical information systems research. Journal of Information Technology 17(2): 69–78.

13.

Evans

(2007) Concepts of bounded agency in education, work, and the personal lives of young adults. International Journal of Psychology 42(2): 85–93.

14.

Evans

Biasin

(2017) Exploring agency, learning and identity in women’s life trajectories in UK and Italy. Revista Española de Educación Comparada 29: 15–32.

15.

Frye

(2019) The myth of agency and the misattribution of blame in collective imaginaries of the future. British Journal of Sociology 70(3): 721–730.

16.

Garfinkel

(1956) Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies. American Journal of Sociology 61(5): 420–424.

17.

Giddens

(1993) New Rules of Sociological Method. Cambridge: Polity.

18.

Gill

(2007) Gender and the Media. Cambridge: Polity.

19.

Goffman

(2005) Interaction Ritual. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.

20.

Harris

Dobson

(2015) Theorizing agency in post-girlpower times. Continuum 29(2): 145–156.

21.

Hays

(1994) Structure and agency and the sticky problem of culture. Sociological Theory 12(1): 57–72.

22.

Hill

(1998) Speaking Truth to Power. New York: Anchor Books.

23.

King

(2009) Overcoming structure and agency: Talcott Parsons, Ludwig Wittgenstein and the theory of social action. Journal of Classical Sociology 9(2): 260–288.

24.

Kripke

(1980) Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

25.

Kripke

(1982) Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

26.

Kusch

(2008) Barnes on the freedom of the will. In: Mazzotti

(ed.) Knowledge as Social Order: Rethinking the Sociology of Barry Barnes. Aldershot: Ashgate, 131–146.

27.

McNulty Norton

(2021, forthcoming) Pure Fatherhood and the Hollywood Family Film. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

28.

Mahmood

(2005) Politics of Piety. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

29.

Pleasants

(1999) Wittgenstein and the Idea of a Critical Social Theory. New York: Routledge.

30.

Roberts

(2010) Misrepresenting ‘choice biographies?’: A reply to Woodman. Journal of Youth Studies 13(1): 137–149.

31.

Roth

(1998) What does the sociology of scientific knowledge explain? In: Velody

Williams

(eds) The Politics of Constructionism. London: SAGE.

32.

Schatzki

(1997) Practices and actions: A Wittgensteinian critique of Bourdieu and Giddens. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27(3): 283–308.

33.

Schwiter

(2013) Neoliberal subjectivity. Geographica Helvetica 68(3): 153–159.

34.

Sweet

(2018) ‘Like you failed at life’: Debt, health and neoliberal subjectivity. Social Science & Medicine 212: 86–93.

35.

Westlund

(2009) Rethinking relational autonomy. Hypatia 24(4): 26–49.

36.

Wittgenstein

(1968) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

37.

Woodman

(2009) The mysterious case of the pervasive choice biography. Journal of Youth Studies 12(3): 243–256.

38.

Young

Marshall

Valach

, et al. (2011) Transition to Adulthood. New York: Springer.

The Responsibilised ‘Agent’ and Other Statuses

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References